have always enjoyed the movies that satirise the movie industry to such a startling degree. Two such films that come to mind are Robert Altman's all-star outing, `The Player' and Peter Weir's tour-de-force of directorial skills, `The Truman Show'. `Simone' is… More
have always enjoyed the movies that satirise the movie industry to such a startling degree. Two such films that come to mind are Robert Altman's all-star outing, `The Player' and Peter Weir's tour-de-force of directorial skills, `The Truman Show'. `Simone' is the next one in line and matches up to the levels of the former, vaguely similar movies. It is strange how `Simone' is simultaneously highly original and occasionally unoriginal. It recycles elements from those two mentioned films along with the surrealness of movies like `Being John Malkovich'. Luckily, it copies the best elements so the result is a very good one.
Of course the concept of digitally creating an actress has never been attempted before (hence the poster quote- `a star is. created'). It may sound highly implausible at first, but it isn't surprising that everyone in the world would believe that `Simone' is real. It skates over the surface of Hollywood hypocrisy but never cuts quite deep enough. Much like `The Truman Show', it is done in the delightfully bizarre style that Australian director Peter Weir created in that picture. The director of this film shows great potential for the future if he follows this up well.
The cinematography is top-notch and it is appropriate that Hollywood has an orange glare while a blue-ish shroud of mist surrounds the indoor areas and studios. The script is brilliant, sharp and witty in some parts, but in others, it seems a little patchy to say the least. The predicted interest curve greatly soars in the first 2 parts, but the surrealness sets in towards the third part, and the comedy becomes increasingly sporadic. While it may seem slightly sour in its offbeat way, it leaves a satisfying taste when the credits roll.
No one could have done the Viktor Taransky part better than la Pacino himself. He is simply tremendous as the Hollywood producer, and has finally dumped the `hoo-haa' image. It's ironic how Rachel Roberts had to pretend to be digitally created, while her digitised character had to pretend to be a human actress. This is one of the most daring roles in cinematic history and she handles it superbly. Supporting performances deserved some more of the limelight, and it's a shame that they don't get much screen-time. Catherine Keener, Jay Mohr, Jason Schartzmann, Elias Koteas and Winona Ryder (brilliantly parodying herself) do well in their small roles, but still needed a bit more conviction.
The movie's greatest powers and occasional flaws lie in the close attention to detail. The visual effects on the computer-generated character are a pleasure to watch and real candy for the eyes. The references to other stars (Sophia Loren, Jodie Foster etc.) are always funny, as is Simone's acceptance speech at the Oscars. It's just a shame that they used fake actresses for the other nominations.
The oddest PG movie you will probably ever see, `Simone' is a memorable, exuberant movie experience. I am puzzled by the `hit and miss' reviews it received and how it was ignored at the box-office. This is a great satire on Hollywood.