Rate It
|
||||||||||||||||
Rating Averages
My Friends |
Not rated. () |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
All Flixster |
(1147275) |
506970 |
228194 |
Female |
(632257) |
279389 |
125757 |
Male |
(515018) |
227581 |
102437 |
More Like This
If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...
Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!
Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.
If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.
| Spider-Man 2 (93%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Spider-Man (91%) |
|
|
| Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (80%) |
|
|
| Justice League: The New Frontier (100%) |
|
|
| Superman: Doomsday (50%) |
|
|
Plot: A strange black entity from another world bonds with Peter Parker and causes inner turmoil as he contends with new villains, temptations, and revenge.
Meet Other Fans
-
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW -
ONLINE NOW
Recent Reviews
No featured reviews yet. Help by rating our reviews.
My Friends Said...
Spider-Man 3 Recent Reviews
Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !
Comments
-
mrbicklethepickleposted 2 days ago -
I hope Sam Raimi doesn't come back for "Spider-Man 4". I'm tired of his take on Spidey. Does it seem to anyone else like Raimi just wants to direct a romantic comedy that just happens to star a superhero? If "Spider-Man 3" had been as good as "Spider-Man 2", I might feel differently, but since "Spider-Man 3" was a major disappointment, I'd be happy to see a new director at the helm of this franchise. (And I wouldn't mind seeing the backs of Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst either.)
posted 27 days ago -
the cast of this movie suked:thomas haden church is too old for sandman and topher grace is too nice looking(if i say cute it will sound gay) to play venom.
posted 139 days ago -
-
Well I heard Spiderman 4 will be out before long in pictures and I haven't even watched this one yet I watched Spiderman 2 and that weren't bad saw I hope this is going to be better.
posted 156 days ago -
-
You know, I actually really like this movie, but it just occurred to me that it would have been a much tighter, more coherent and ultimately better film if Sam Raimi had omitted Sandman. I liked Sandman, mind you- I thought he was well-played for being such a minor foe in the comics, and they certainly got the look right. But he was ultimately an attempt to maintain the tone of the second film, a classic Spidey villain to offset the newer, darker ones- in the end, he served no purpose in the narrative that couldn't have been served by Harry or some nameless thugs. It's funny that they would try to turn Sandman into a villain with personal ties to Peter when Harry and Venom are two of the most personal foes Spidey has ever faced- why throw in Sandman, too? The film would have been much sharper if it had focussed on Harry's obsession with vengeance (hopefully ended in a more plausible way), Peter's descent into darkness, and their mutual attempts to achieve redemption. Still, I liked it.
posted 165 days ago -
its actually a good movie but i was expecting more actions, fight scenes and i mean more..i don't know but when i was watching it i enjoyed but i was expecting more....i think the 1 and the 2nd one is more good than this...i hope the 4th installment will be more actions, and fight scenes...
posted 189 days ago -
its actually a good movie but i was expecting more actions, fight scenes and i mean more..i don't when i was watching it i enjoyed but i was expecting more....i think the 1 and the 2nd one is more good than this...i hope the 4th installment will be more actions, and fight scenes...
posted 189 days ago -
