Stalker poster & wallpaper

Aleksandr Kajdanovsky, Anatoli Solonitsyn, Nikolai Grinko

Near a gray and unnamed city is the Zone, an alien place guarded by barbed wire and soldiers. Over his wife's numerous objections, a man rises in the dead of night: he's a stalker, one of a handful wh...( read more  read more... )o have the mental gifts (and who risk imprisonment) to lead people into the Zone to the Room, a place where one's secret hopes come true. That night, he takes two people into the Zone: a popular writer who is burned out, cynical, and questioning his genius; and a quiet scientist more concerned about his knapsack than the journey. In the deserted Zone, the approach to the Room must be indirect. As they draw near, the rules seem to change and the stalker faces a crisis.

Flixster Users

95% liked it

17,157 ratings

Critics

100% liked it

16 critics

Unrated, 2 hrs. 41 min.

Directed by: Andrei Tarkovsky

Release Date: August 1, 1979

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: October 15, 2002

Stats: 1,295 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites
report incorrect info

Photos

stalker Stalker Stalker at bar Scene from Stalker Stalker Aleksandr Kajdanovsky Natasha Abramova
Upload a Photo |

View All Stalker Photos (8)

Your Rating


clear rating

Flixster Reviews (1,295)

  • 366weirdmovies
    August 23, 2009
    366weirdmovies
    A "Stalker" has the skill to lead the curious past armed guards and mystifiying traps into a mysterious area known as The Zone, inside which there is rumored to be a room that will grant the visitor's innermost wish. Typically slow and impenetrably obscure movie by Tarkovsky, wh...( read more)ich almost lulls you to sleep with long stretches where nothing happens, then suddenly shocks you with an unforgettable image of haunting beauty.
  • brooklynspo
    January 29, 2009
    brooklynspo
    My least favorite Tarkovsky thus far. So talky, so ambivalent, so... dull.

    I really should afford this a second and third chance as I was stuck reading the subtitles most of the first viewing. I do not relish the thought.
  • rubystevens
    October 2, 2008
    rubystevens
    gorgeous and mesmerising tho the last quarter was a bit talky and thoroughly confusing. a kind of claustrophobic surrealist nightmare. wait, that's inland empire. i loved the ending tho i'm not sure what happened beyond that the stalker had some sort of existential crisis. pe...( read more)rhaps it's a religious allegory about faith. anyway the cinematography was superb. i'll be thinking about this for awhile
  • Jungian
    June 20, 2008
    Jungian
    Tarkovsky's exploration of the id is infinitely fascinating and at times equally impenetrable.
  • kenstachnik
    March 31, 2008
    kenstachnik
    Tarkovsky's masterwork of science fiction is a must see for fans of the genre.

    This dark highly atmospheric film is photographically on par with any Bergman or Kubrick film.
  • blacksheepboy
    November 8, 2009
    blacksheepboy
    A deeply metaphysical and philosophical allegory about human desire and the search for happiness, Tarkovsky's Stalker is beautiful and hypnotical, though somehow difficult and not as sentimentally engaging as Solyaris.
  • wacax
    November 3, 2009
    wacax
    Sometimes is ambiguous compared to the book "Roadside Picnic", in which is loosely based.
    I think there should be a little more explanation about the zome, traps and objects left.
    But overall the picture is quite striking.
    I like the last scene...
  • HateYouIgnorant
    October 31, 2009
    HateYouIgnorant
    !Comercial or Stupid! :|
  • ElCochran90
    October 17, 2009
    ElCochran90
    "The Zone wants to be respected. Otherwise it will punish."

    STALKER (1979)


    Director: Andrei Tarkovsky
    Country: Soviet Union / West Germany
    Genre: Adventure / Drama / Fantasy / Mystery / Sci-Fi
    Length: 163 minutes...( read more)

    Photobucket


    Slowly following the masterful filmography of the best Soviet director since Sergei M. Eisenstein, Stalker is the cinematic project we should encounter. This time, Tarkovsky leaves aside the strongly spiritual Catholic influence he applied in Andrey Rublyov (1966), the philosophical approach of the insignificant effect of the human being in the Universe he depicted in Solyaris (1972) and the patriotically nostalgic approach he used in Zerkalo (1975) for the sake of the Russian nation. The final result is quite possibly the most ignored precursor of the cyberpunk genre, engaging by its own merits and as ambitious as the questionings of the meaning and origin of life. Stalker is truly one of the first films of its kind, influential because of its technical aspects but never equaled because of its originality, apocalyptic vision and extreme philosophical depth, truths that ultimately remained unexplained. Moving from the physical size of the human being to its most primitive behaviors and reactions, such as curiosity, material and spiritual insatiableness, agnosticism and ambition, Stalker is a challenging piece of filmmaking at its finest form of stillness expression.

    For making a brief description of the plot, the most basic question is originated: What is a stalker? We must first understand that the film is set in an apocalyptic and undetermined future, a time where the Zone is located. The Zone is a place which origins remain mysterious enough to awaken the curiosity of man. It is an alien place surrounded by barbed wire and soldiers. A stalker is a man who has been given the mental gift of illegally conducting people into the Room, a place located within the Zone where all wishes come true. Stalker tells the story of a man who, despite the several objections of his wife, decides to conduct a popular writer and a scientist to the Room, but a crisis will eventually ensue. Tarkovsky attracted the attention of the Cannes Film Festival once again in 1980, winning a very special award: the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury along with Krzysztof Zanussi's Constans (1980).

    Undoubtedly, this is Andrei Tarkovsky's most ambitious film. His masterfulness and utopian brilliance prevented the film from falling into a vast realm of pretentiousness. Once more, Stalker is technical perfection at its most spellbinding, haunting and captivating form. Lengthy shots and perfectly balanced cinematography are the technique used by Tarkovsky in a much more noticeable way, sometimes surpassing the total time of 7 minutes for one single take. A color differentiation is utilized for distinguishing the unidentified city and the personal thoughts and flashbacks of the characters with a sepia tone, and the Zone with full, harmonic color. The camera placements and the editing justify such human cinematic perfection and psychologically prepare the audience for a philosophical, deep, complex, unexplainable, chaotic, epiphanic, cathartic, existentialist, slow-paced, ambitious and divine ride.

    Stalker erases all human names and any possible identity. The stalker is Stalker. The writer is Writer. The scientist is Scientist. Stalker's wife is Stalker's Wife! Man is depicted not as a faceless entity, but as a primitive creature, reducing it to a living thing whose ego, pride and agnosticism leads him to question everything he sees, anything that can't be seen nor understood at first glance. Such stubborn attitude causes him to venture into the realm of the prohibited, of the mysterious. This basic and hard-to-direct premise immediately justifies the existence of a place that can grant any wish. The magic lamp is materialized into a desolated, ultimately cubic space. How does man can reach the magic lamp? What is the physical appearance of the lamp genius? How can man manipulate his supposed three wishes?

    These means have never been clear and are naturally transformed into myths and tales of the popular culture. However, what happens if a master of cinema takes this longing disillusion of man and transforms it into a film which is an utter mix of fantastic genres? As a necessary consequence, the Zone, the only path to the Room, possesses a mathematical nature of its own. "The Zone wants to be respected. Otherwise it will punish." Those two sentences are strictly told by the stalker, a man who cannot understand the supernatural nature of the Zone, yet understands the respect that it deserves to an extent of admiring it. Several possibilities of the origin of the Zone are explained, which remain irrevocably human. "It is a sign of life outside the planet." "It is God's punishment for mankind's present evil and maliciousness." "It was originated from a meteorite." These assumptions were originated from man. The Zone, with the Room as its "heart", is mainly depicted either as a living entity or as an inert place full of life. It has a conscience. It defies even any logic sense. Going straightforward is no longer going straightforward. It can also be implied that if you are not meant to reach the Zone, you will never reach it. God's will is an implicit factor when the film starts to resort to the Holy Bible, emphasizing the wrath of God interpreted through the eyes of the prophets and the words of David's Psalms.

    Interestingly enough, Tarkovsky offers several clues throughout that could explain the origin of the Zone. A nearly four-minute shot emphasizes several objects underwater that could have been caused by an apocalyptic war. World War III, perhaps? Shortage of water or territorial conflicts could have been the actors behind the curtains once again. Perhaps we are even facing a scarily cinematic prediction of a future that patiently waits to unleash a catastrophe, such as Metropolis (1927), a movie that demonstrated a society completely ruled by totalitarian control, industrialization and technology, characteristics of modern real life.

    This film is as relative as philosophy itself. The conclusion of the film illustrated with Ludwig van Beethoven's Ode to Joy, an ending scene which I will not even dare to mention here, could be compared with several things, from the humanization of the robots and androids shown in films (like Metropolis [1927]) to the early events mentioned in the book of Genesis, when angels and demons procreated monstrous beings. It is like remaking the same event or idea several times throughout the pass of the decades. Although a stalker still remains human, it surpasses the human race with a single mental ability. After all, Martha has a name. She is not Stalker's Daugher, although she is, but she is Martha, who she really is as well. Is she a new beginning for the human race? Is she determining our fate, or our future mental and physical capacities? Is she a human being, or an anomaly, a mistake of nature? Is the Zone a place that originates hallucinations in a person, like a mental drug? Is it also an anomaly and a mistake of nature?

    A film that creates more questions than answers, Stalker is one of the most ambitious works of art in motion picture history. It is also one of the most influential. This is Tarkovsky's last humanly-perfect masterpiece that uses the science-fiction genre as a perfect excuse for enlightening both the beauty of cinema and the vastness of the human mind. The Zone is just the quiet motor that symbolizes the rabbit hole. Perhaps that is why the film is not completely considered as a cyberpunk film. It surpasses any film of the genre. Masses applauding Alien (1979) as one of the best films (if not the best film) of the genre will be mentally challenged and inevitably bored by this visual treat, a call to intellectualism and a staggering approach to the usefulness of human existentialism, including the meaning of believing in God. If you ever think Monkey is a symbolic name, you are absolutely correct...

    100/100
  • Weetzie
    September 6, 2009
    Weetzie
    not a movie you can 'understand'. a mystery, philosophical chain of thoughts, breathtaking visual touch.

View All Stalker Reviews

Critic Reviews

April 25, 2006
Nick Schager, Slant Magazine

A tangled knot of memories, fears, fantasies, nightmares, paradoxical impulses, and a yearning for something that's simultaneously beyond our reach and yet intrinsic to every one of us. full review

View more Stalker reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments

This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Stalker" !

Post A Comment | View All Comments

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.

Cast

More Like This

Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Saragossa Manuscript
    The Saragossa Manuscript (67%)
  • Cube
    Cube (29%)
  • 4 Luni, 3 Saptamâni si 2 Zile (4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days)
    4 Luni, 3 Saptamâni si 2 Zile (4 Months, 3 We... (100%)
  • Nostalghia
    Nostalghia (86%)

More Movies like Stalker

Facts

No facts approved yet. Be the first

Stalker : Watch Free on TV

Stalker Trivia

  • who was the creepy/stalker boyfriend in fear  Answer »
  • Which of the following actors has played a psycotic stalker, a ferel man raised by animals in the wild, an american football player and the devil's son?  Answer »
  • Who plays the evil stalker on the other end of the line in Phone Booth.  Answer »
  • In which movie did Rachel McAdams ride in a plane with a killer/stalker?   Answer »
More Stalker Trivia

Movie Quizzes

Create a Quiz |

All Quizzes

Video Clips

Upload a Video |

All Stalker Videos

Meet Other Fans

Add Stalker to favorites

Recent News

No recent headlines. Got one?

Recent Lists

Make a List |

View All Lists

Most Popular Skin

No skins yet. Interested in creating one?