Featured Audience Ratings

• Spencer S

  
  A very tender and dark little biopic that skims the surface of the sensitive and prolific poet and author Sylvia Plath. The film itself was bleak, wounding around the life of Plath, but more than anything also focused on her lover and husband Ted Hughes. Everything is dark angles and… More
  A very tender and dark little biopic that skims the surface of the sensitive and prolific poet and author Sylvia Plath. The film itself was bleak, wounding around the life of Plath, but more than anything also focused on her lover and husband Ted Hughes. Everything is dark angles and gilt mirrors with the poignant performance from lead Gwyneth Paltrow. She is yet again playing a British woman in a destructive relationship, except there is definitely a power play between herself and her husband. Both are poets, both want to be taken seriously, and both have the lowest of lows and the highest of highs. In the film Paltrow showcases Plath's irrelevancy next to her husband's broad fame among the intellectuals and middle class alike. He is dashingly handsome, and ends up romancing many of their female acquaintances, which only drives Plath madder than she already is as a result. Worse, is that he retains the fame whilst she is still struggling to write anything at all. She feels dwarfed in his huge shadow, and the film does a great job of illustrating how isolated Plath was by making her seem small among the darkness of the cinematography. There is little to no light in this entire film. Both Paltrow and her leading man, Daniel Craig, are entirely enshrouded in shadow throughout this film, even when it's supposed to be day. When the sun shines, it's bleak and oppressive,which was highly unrealistic, and gave us the feeling that Plath must have gone through a period of listless hatred, even in the company of her two children. Her erratic behavior lent little in the film, except for the brief scene in the beginning, but she does confide her feelings to an ardent supporter, played by the great character actor Jared Harris. What doesn't work in this film is that there isn't any buildup to Plath's suicide. The ending feels anticlimactic, mostly because her husband isn't assigned any dimensions except that of a vicarious jerk. He flits in and out of the story, only to give her children and make her miserable, but at the end he's only a face in the crowd of onlookers. There was nothing traumatic about this film, nothing to cling to Plath as a person, or the ideals of her work. There just could have been so much more done with the script and the way it was shot, and that really was just underwhelming for me as a viewer.

• Cynthia S

  
  This movie was very interesting. It was a bit dry at points, but was so intriguing that it kept my complete attention. The psychology of the two main characters was amazing, and the movie was done brilliantly. Also, seeing Paltrow in a new role like this was phenomenal, and very… More
  This movie was very interesting. It was a bit dry at points, but was so intriguing that it kept my complete attention. The psychology of the two main characters was amazing, and the movie was done brilliantly. Also, seeing Paltrow in a new role like this was phenomenal, and very surprising. I think that she did a wonderful job depicting this very, very sad woman. Kudos!

• ♥Robyn

  
  Sylvia stars, Gwyneth Paltrow as the American poet and Daniel Craig as her husband and fellow poet Ted Hughes. It begins with their meeting in Cambridge and ends with Plath's death in 1963, so it essentially follows the course of their relationship, Plath's struggle to write… More
  Sylvia stars, Gwyneth Paltrow as the American poet and Daniel Craig as her husband and fellow poet Ted Hughes. It begins with their meeting in Cambridge and ends with Plath's death in 1963, so it essentially follows the course of their relationship, Plath's struggle to write and with the break-up of their marriage, Plath's original but tortured out-pourings, breakdown and death.Gwyneth plays the part quite well she gives a touching performance in my opinion

• Veronique K

  
  "sylvia" is a mighty bio-piece of the legendary poetess sylvia plath who terminated her own life by sticking her head into an oven, but mainly about her famous/infamous relationship with british laureate ted hughes who firstly achieved fame by his "hawk in the… More
  "sylvia" is a mighty bio-piece of the legendary poetess sylvia plath who terminated her own life by sticking her head into an oven, but mainly about her famous/infamous relationship with british laureate ted hughes who firstly achieved fame by his "hawk in the rain"...personally i absolutely cannot buy into the movie's premise that this is one of the most essential romances in 20th century...but to appreciate "sylvia", you've got to hypnotize yourself with such notion. so sylvia plath is a genius woman who's been obssessed with death after her dad passed suddenly when she was 9, then this young lady with such explosively sparkling intelligence falls under the spell of talented ted hughes who has the magnetism to frighten her off with challenging attractiveness as sylvia's mom puts it bluntly. except hughes' extraordinary gift as a poet, he has nothing adequately made for an ideal husband or father: he's a womanizer, an egoist whose priority is not family but his own recognition and he cannot really offer any solid tenderness to her except some momentary stormy passion. in several scenes of his infidelity, he even angers at her then returns to her later with a brief "sorry, i love you" but still keeps on the same mistakes afterwards. but how about sylvia herself? she's also quite a difficult person with some serious symptoms of paranoia and some severe torments of her death wishes, not easy to get along with, either. it proves one fatal point that if two strong egos build a bond together, the union's doomed to collide into the ruin of one side which is more brittle with stubborn frailty. besides, why brilliant woman likes to be with such arrogant man to be your "black marauder" (as sylvia herself dubs it in her poem) who mostly takes and rarely gives? why not appreciative gentleman who admires the soils you step upon as talented man always marries submissive woman who's easy to handle? gwyneth paltrow amazes me with her showcasing performances, and before i only thought of her as someone who makes her success by dubbing herself with a tangibly conventional east-coast glamour, a grace-kelly-wanna-be. the other surprise would be daniel craig as ted hughes, he's much more appealing as hughes than his later smashing role as millennium james bond. his ruggedness and ballistic energy are all demonstrated quite well as his winsome qualities for a leading man. craig serves an effective purpose to romanticize ted hughes in numerous smoldering love scenes with paltrow, and a sizzling feverish spunk could be felt upon him then somehow you could comprehend why she's so much into him. daniel craig's never been as sensual as he is in "sylvia", but since he was not so well-famed then so the focus of "sylvia" is still majorly on paltrow as her vehicle. in a nutshell, calling the relationship of ted and sylvia one of the essential romances or great loves in 20th century is a hypocritical and absurd idea in spite of all the engrossing intensities the leads have projected on screen, even by watching the movie itself, you could feel this match is bad sass tailored by a woman's compulsively masochistic drive, her own strong need of self-victimization, no wonder of her choice over ted hughes whose second wife also commits sucide in the same way as sylvia plath: head in the oven. besides, it is spoiling enough to have all these literary feuds posed by their separate enthusiastic readers that include those who accuse hughes as chauvinistic asshole who tortures sylvia and those who condemn plath as abrasive psychobitch whose haunting intimidations push her lover away. additionally, some controversial editing problems on hughes' manipulated erase of evidence over sylvia's diaries and parts of her words against him aren't quite plesant to dig into as well. so, wouldn't you find it odd to make an epic romance on a couple of such obvious discord???

• Michael G

  
  I saw it a few years ago and remember not really caring. The scenes before Plath eventually kills herself (sorry if I'm ruining anything for anyone here) are mildly entertaining and maybe I'm a freak here, but I've always been a sucker for a Gwyneth Paltrow sex scene.

• Deb S

  
  The bio-pic of Sylvia Plath, an American acclaimed poet/author whose manic depressive state led to her successful suicide (not a spoiler) after several failed attempts but not before her stormy marriage to the equally successful British poet Ted Hughes (Daniel Craig) who attempted to… More
  The bio-pic of Sylvia Plath, an American acclaimed poet/author whose manic depressive state led to her successful suicide (not a spoiler) after several failed attempts but not before her stormy marriage to the equally successful British poet Ted Hughes (Daniel Craig) who attempted to quell her suspicious mind despite his weaknesses which included womanizing. Gwyneth Paltrow does a good job of portraying Sylvia Plath capturing her pain and dark, depressive state after her shattered relationship to Hughes ultimately causes her suicidal tendencies to resurface. She portrays Sylvia's mental problems, her bouts of insecurities and heartbreak well. In the end I believe Hughes was remorseful for his actions and kept Plath's poetry alive by compiling her work which was later published in subsequent years. My thoughts: it seems to me that Sylvia's troubles triggered from the moment she lost her father, at the tender age of 9 and progressed through the tremulous love hate relationship between herself and mom which led to her first famous suicide attempt. After her marriage to Hughes, she finds herself struggling to write as she balances home life with working as a teacher. Things are made worse when she has kids and succumbs to the mental anguish that is tormenting her. As the pressures of family and children grew, so did Sylvia's mistrust of Ted and paranoia over his behavior. Her dark, inward rage spiraled out of control culminating in her ending her life. A dismal little film that might have ended differently had anyone realized she was mentally ill and needed treatment for her depression.

• Juli R

  
  Gwyneth Paltrow is a convincing Sylvia Plath. But the screenplay seems two-dimensional. Plath is described as someone attracted to death, not as someone who is trying to escape the confines of a bell jar. It is a melodramatic script, and Plath is neither sympathetic nor a monster.

• Sunil J

  
  Very good biopic that's faithful to the life of Sylvia Plath and shows a lot of similarities to her and her character in the Bell Jar.

• Eduardo C

  
  Dying Is an art, like everything else. I do it exceptionally well. I do it so it feels like hell. I do it so it feels real. I guess you could say I've a call. --------------------------------------- I am your opus, I am your valuable, The pure gold baby… More
  Dying Is an art, like everything else. I do it exceptionally well. I do it so it feels like hell. I do it so it feels real. I guess you could say I've a call. --------------------------------------- I am your opus, I am your valuable, The pure gold baby That melts to a shriek. I turn and burn. Do not think I underestimate your great concern. Ash, ash--- You poke and stir. Flesh, bone, there is nothing there---- A cake of soap, A wedding ring, A gold filling. Herr God, Herr Lucifer Beware Beware. Out of the ash I rise with my red hair And I eat men like air. With the first group of lines above, an excerpt from Sylvia Plath's undeniable masterpiece "Lady Lazarus", this film opens. With the second, from the same source, it should have closed. Sylvia Plath is my favorite poet, so this is a film I'd been keeping my eye on for quite a while. With the casting of Gwynneth Paltrow I almost hyperventilated. I am no fan of hers, and she did not strike me Plath-like in any way, save perhaps the coldness with which she delivers her performances. I confess to being pleasantly surprised, however. Not only is Paltrow a decent stand-in for Sylvia, but the film is very well done, a bit simplistic perhaps, but courageously refusing to resort to exploitation or cheap manipulation to get its points across. It is beautifully photographed and well structured, certainly. Daniel Craig has an interesting, very masculine take on Ted Hughes which somehow works and there is nothing inherently 'wrong' with the film itself. However, for a Sylvia Plath fan there is little here I had not seen or read before, so at times it felt more like an excercise than an artistic experience. "The Bell Jar" this is not. Still, I did enjoy it. It was directed withan artist's eye and, for someone whose life was tragically predicated around 3 suicides, the film is not morbid at all. I am not too sure what the average film goer will get out of it, but I don't really care either. Boo.

• Leo L

  
  good.

Read all 10 featured audience ratings