Rate It

Seen it:    
Not seen it: 
Review: 
 
clear rating

Share It

Rating Averages

My Friends Not rated. () Want To See Not Interested
All Flixster 3.0 Stars (33) Want To See 29 Not Interested 284
Female 2.5 Stars (10) Want To See 9 Not Interested 88
Male 3.0 Stars (23) Want To See 20 Not Interested 196

More Like This

Tip

If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...

Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!

Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.

If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.

Last Battle for the Universe: Josh Kirby... T... (33%)

Plot: In this lighthearted sci-fi adventure (part of a popular series), the titular 14-year-old (Corbin Allred) and his fellow time travelers find themselves marooned on a weird planet and held captive by a...( read more read more... )lien behemoths. Josh, Azabeth (Jennifer Burns) and Prism (Derek Webster) are captured in the year 70,379 by the gargantuan Fatlings, huge creatures that intend to keep their prisoners as -- gulp! -- pets. Frank Arnold directs.

Post it anywhere Link it anywhere

Recent Reviews

  • 1.0 Star
    MCT:
    August 20, 2006
    I think this movie is quite popularly believed to be the worst in the entire six movie saga, and is most definitely my least favorite in the series. What I think that it really lacks is the love and care that went into all of the other films, which makes this movie less hard to enjoy. It just seems completely slapped together at the last minute, like they weren't even going to include it, but they ended up doing it right before the movies were released on video. Besides that, the plot is the weakest out of all the movies, and it really doesn't help that the whole first half of Human Pets is taken over by the ending to Dino-Knights. And the end of Dino-Knights on this movie is ended so ubruptly, you will miss it if you blink.

    The Human Pets simply seems unfun. I don't have a very good time when I watch it. Yes the acting it just as bad or good as always depending on whether you are Jennifer Burns and Derek Webser (bad) or Barrie Ingham (good).

    This movies story really makes more sense as the first movie, as we get a lot of insigts into the character of Azabeth Siege. We see how Josh and Azabeth get to know eachother, making it seem more realistic that Josh "cares a lot about her" in the first Time Warrior movie in which there is no way that the two could have ever bonded in such a way, because their first meeting in Dino Knights is entirly unfriendly.

    It really is not such a great installment in the epic movie, it just lacks the badness that was so good in the other movies. This movie is simply so bad that it is almost not good anymore. Though, I do enjoy some of it, most of it seems like a waste of time.

    It really is a bad movie, don't think that I am saying anything different, but it just doesn't have as much potential as the other movies in the series to be so bad that they are good. At least worth a go if you are interested to see what happens at the end of Dino Knights.

My Friends Said...

Comments

This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "The Human Pets: Josh Kirby...Time Warrior!" !

Details

  • Rated: (Unrated)
  • Directed by: Frank Arnold, Frank Arnold (II)
  • Genres: Kids & Family, Action & Adventure, Science Fiction & Fantasy
  • Released: December 31, 1995
  • DVD Released: September 13, 2005

Movie Quizzes

The Human Pets: Josh Kirby...Time Warrior! Quizzes

No quizzes for The Human Pets: Josh Kirby...Time Warrior!. Want to create one?