Arthur Byron, Boris Karloff, Bramwell Fletcher

You have to hand it to the walking dead. What they lack in speed and agility, they more than make up for in sheer single-minded determination. Im-Ho-Tep is a case in point. He's an ancient Egyptian pr...( read more  read more... )iest, cursed for his terrible crimes against the gods. A team of British archaeologists digs up his sarcophagus, along with a box inscribed with a warning that opening it will unleash death and destruction. You'll never guess what they do. Once freed, Im-Ho-Tep takes on the appropriately evil alias Ardath Bey and gets to the task of resurrecting his ancient lover--which will, of course, require a living human surrogate. While the premise may sound formulaic, The Mummy in fact turns out to be bracingly weird, relying on atmospheric creepiness rather than on jump-out-and-scare-you effects. Boris Karloff gives a terrific performance as Im-Ho-Tep. He has all the malevolence the film requires, but also manages subtler touches; the expression in his eyes as he is wrapped in preparation for being buried alive is absolutely chilling. Instead of forcing him to do all the tedious shambling around that so many mummies resort to, the filmmakers have wisely given Im-Ho-Tep/Ardath Bey a nearly living appearance once he's cleaned up and has a few psychic powers to boot, making him a potent adversary. Stock up on ace bandages and prepare for a good spooky evening. --Ali Davis

Flixster Users

68% liked it

8,966 ratings

Unrated, 74 min.

Directed by: Karl Freund

Release Date: December 22, 1932

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 28, 2001

Stats: 400 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (400)


  • July 18, 2009
    Where Frankenstein's creation is always a monster, and the Wolf Man is a monster only when the moon is full, the Mummy is, as Universal Studios puts forth here, not a monster at all - the Mummy is a man. True, he initially makes his appearance wrapped head to toe in bandages, bu...( read more)t throughout the vast majority of his screen time he's a walking, talking, breathing fellow in dire need of moisturizer. In later incarnations, such as those produced by Britain's famous Hammer Studios, the mummy is little more than a mindless fiend intent on destroying everyone he meets, but here he's a character of depth, sophistication and dark ambition. Film fans expecting to be frightened out of their wits by this picture are bound to be disappointed. Instead they'll find a presentation that, with a few exceptions, is more thriller than horror. All this is more observation than critique. I love this movie, but not for the same reasons that I love other Universal Studios horror classics. The brilliance here lies in the dialog, in the intent, and in the performances. Where Frankenstein is unbound and the Wolf Man is unleashed, the Mummy is simply unwrapped.
  • May 31, 2009
    its a classic!
  • August 4, 2008
    I love these Universal horror movies. This one is all atmosphere. The lighting, the focus on Karloff's eyes and his threatening persona carry the film. When I was in elementary school (my kids would say not long after this film was made), I had another kid scare the daylights out...( read more) of me by describing the internment of the Egyptian rulers. The taking of the body, perfuming it, placing it in a room full of gold, then killing the slaves so that only the priests would know the actual resting place of the body. There was also the bit about being wrapped alive for burial. I'll tell you. The effect of that story, which is portrayed in the movie, put a bigger scare into me than any movie I've ever seen. Since this one was really the only one we would ever see on television, I watched it every time I could. Isn't it interesting that both the Lugosi "Dracula" use a quotation from "Swan Lake" as a theme song. I've always wondered why that is. It is certainly eerie and as the credits roll, it builds in intensity. I was told once that Tchaikovsky would probably do movie soundtracks if he were alive today. Pardon my digressions. It is interesting that the mummy (as a fully wrapped personage) really doesn't appear after the beginning sequence--we just know that old Boris is in the process of decay and will eventually be sent to his eternal reward. As usual, the scientists and those who should know, carelessly leave the young woman unattended and he makes his move. The threatening suavity of Karloff is the high point of the movie. I feel the world received such a gift when these films were made. It is a delight, full of frightening images and classic moments.
  • June 24, 2007
    Forget all the clones and remakes, this is the only Mummy film worth watching. Karloff is perfectly cast.
  • November 21, 2006
    Another of Boris Karloff's signature monster movies, The Mummy is a fantastic old classic that should be enjoyed by all. Utilizing great makeup and costuming,and featuring a romantic storyline, it's one of those movies that will stay with you forever.
  • November 2, 2009
    Somehow I missed this one, but was reminded after watching The Ghoul. I have seen both the Hammer Films remake as well as the Brendan Frazier one, so I had an inkling of the story. Though neither of those really follow this story, all still have a love-lorn mummy (woken by people...( read more) who didnt understand the power of the curse) who finds someone resembling his past lover. This was about as good as I would have suspected after watching other Universal productions from this era.
  • October 31, 2009
    I think overall, this is a superior film to both Dracula and Frankenstein. the makeup and effects were excellent, and the sets were very well-crafted. Boris Karloff's Imhotep is both superbly creepy and pitiable, from his professions of love to the close-up shots of his "scary"...( read more) face. Zita Johann plays a gorgeous leading lady, as well. The writing, for the most part, is ok--anything expositional and anything uttered by Van Sloan's character, however, is absolutely awful. still, the film is entertaining and it's another instant classic from Carl Laemmle.
  • October 23, 2009
    The parodies were imminent after a release so cheesy,thoroughly trifle and yet so charming (which wouldn't happen without miss Zita's provocative body-eloquence).
    Freund managed to steer the wheel of this considerably spooky but not particularly hollow film,so Karloff's glance fi...( read more)lls in wherever it's necessary!
  • September 18, 2009
    Another horror classic for the ages, starring Boris Karloff.

    70/100
  • August 9, 2009
    a great original.
    a bit unrealistick but what can you expect from a movie made in 1932.

Critic Reviews


No recent reviews.

Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "The Mummy" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Click
    Click (50%)
  • The Mummy
    The Mummy (62%)
  • The Mummy's Tomb
    The Mummy's Tomb (100%)
  • Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein
    Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (33%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Mummy : Watch Free on TV


The Mummy Trivia


  • Name the movie that stars Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weizs.  Answer »
  • Which of the following legends is not in the movie "VAN HELSING"?  Answer »
  • In what movie does Brendon Fraser battle to put the mummy, Imhotept, back in his coffin?  Answer »
  • What scares the Mummy out of the room, in the movie, The Mummy?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin