Rate It

Seen it:    
Not seen it: 
Review: 
 
clear rating

Share It

Rating Averages

My Friends Not rated. () Want To See Not Interested
All Flixster 3.0 Stars (29245) Want To See 27759 Not Interested 54829
Female 3.0 Stars (15118) Want To See 14350 Not Interested 28344
Male 3.0 Stars (14127) Want To See 13409 Not Interested 26485

More Like This

Tip

If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...

Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!

Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.

If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.

Dances With Wolves (65%)
The Last of the Mohicans (62%)
The Thin Red Line (57%)
Jungle Fever (25%)
Around the World in 80 Days (50%)

Plot: This epic adventure is set amid the encounter of European and Native American cultures during the founding of the Jamestown Settlement in 1607. Inspired by the legend of John Smith and Pocahontas, thi...( read more read more... )

Post it anywhere Link it anywhere

Recent Reviews

No featured reviews yet. Help by rating our reviews.

My Friends Said...

The New World Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Comments

  • darnitalltoheck
    Beautiful peice of art he touches her and looks at her the way every man should to a woman, he doesn't fall in love with her body but her and her soul!!! Its sad that they grew apart and in the end she chooses as different path but sometimes a beautiful picture is painted not for you to enjoy it but for you to move on to the next one and only by looking at the first can you fully appreicate, understand, and love the second!!!!! If you can't understand that then your missing the entire aspect of life and its meaning! Beautiful music and a tender story (I've watched it millions of times!!!!) Always the same butterflies in my stomach completley and utterly stunning!!!
    posted 308 days ago
  • TheBohemian
    This movie = Lava Lamp.
    'Nuff said.
    posted 392 days ago
  • mardijo
    omg Exile89 you hit it on the head.
    there was no dialogue, and what there was i didnt understand! you had to rely on the cinematrography to know what was going on and with all the arty shots of nothing even that was hard to follow.
    and you had no idea about how much time had passed i mean come on, shots to distinguish that its a different time are easy to through in!
    and not ending up with john smith in the end is was just icing on the cake.
    disneys the best, it had awesome songs (even if in pocahontas 2 she got a new love interest)
    posted 501 days ago
  • mardijo
    i can understand why people like this film. i can apreciate the shot compostion, it was really beautiful, but it was boring as hell! it was soo slow, if it was me i would cut about an hour off it, cause all the arty shots were just boring! and i appreciate arty films, i like things that are artistcally challenging (i study media i have to look at that sorta thing all the time, hey were making an arthouse short film now) but this was just badly done, and from a director with that many years under his belt id expect a lot more!
    after the whole extended bit of him living with the indians, i just ended up amusing my self by comparing the movie to Pocahontus, and finding reasons why the disney one was better. i was watching it with my dad and he were doing the same thing. by the time they got to engliand we was like "where's all the songs? and the talking tree? raccon?' but then hey they landed and their was a dog, and their was the racoon in a cage! the movie was just a bad Pochontus.
    posted 501 days ago
  • 1nhl
    Don't you think the reason why this movie rebukes (apparently) so many viewers is because they expect an epic tale of clashing civilizations, a romance of star-crossed lovers or a novel about the first European settlements in America, and get instead a poem about trees, organic growth and the discovery and acceptance of the self and of one's place in the universe (which is very different from "resignation")? It might be judicious to see it that way before debunking it on criteria (slow, contemplative pace, few direct dialogues and such) which do not apply to it.
    posted 544 days ago
  • cerocks
    I can appreciate all comments on the daring aspect of the film. Its bold in its scope and accurate representation of fact. However when watching it the only thing i have seen before that i can liken it too is a 2hour long perfume commercial; Well not the entire film of course but there were these points throughout the film when he was learning the ways of the indians, when the sun is shooting through the trees and he is holding the indian women in his arms yadda yadda and i just expected it to go "Calvin Klein" or something. Don't get me wrong i appreciate the effort, and liked the contrast between the settlers and the natives, but it prob is the worst film i've seen in along time...and i've seen american dreamz another terrible film so thats saying something
    posted 552 days ago
  • hulabazoo82
    how come Q'Orianka Kilcher is not on the actors list? she was amazing in this film especially seeing as she was only 14 when they started filming it!!!
    posted 618 days ago
  • Seikan
    That, TericK, is why you fail at life.
    posted 635 days ago
  • TericK
    THIS IS THE WORST MOVIE I'LL EVER SEE IN MY WHOLE ENTIRE LIFE!!! TOTAL WASTE OF TIME!!! STARE AT THE CELLING IS BETTER THAN THAT!!! MY GOD!! I WANTED TO KILL MYSELF WHEN I WAS WATCHING THIS F***** MOVIE!!!

    DON'T WATCH IT!!!
    posted 635 days ago
  • munakhatib
    Oh my god!! i am so dissapointed!! i mean i know it's Colin Farrell but it was a lousy movie.. didn't even watched it till the end! i really regret watching it!!
    posted 676 days ago

Details

  • Rated: (PG-13)
  • Directed by: Terrence Malick
  • Genres: Drama, Action & Adventure
  • Released: January 13, 2005
  • DVD Released: May 9, 2006

Recent News

Movie Quizzes

The New World Quizzes