Liev Schreiber, Julia Stiles, Mia Farrow

The prophecy from the Book of Revelation provides a map to a terrifying future. The passage specifically points to the arrival of the Anti-Christ and the beginning of Armageddon. Robert Thorn, a senio...( read more  read more... )r American diplomat, has other things on his mind. His wife, Katherine, who had suffered two previous miscarriages, has endured yet another unsuccessful delivery, but she's unaware their newborn child has died. The hospital priest, Father Spiletto, presents Thorn with another child born that night, whose mother died in childbirth. The priest compels Thorn to take the infant boy as his own. Katherine will never know the truth. Katherine embraces the child as her own, blossoming in motherhood. Thorn's career ascends. He becomes the U.S. ambassador to Great Britain, and the family settles into an estate outside London. But certain disturbing events seem to revolve around the now five-year-old Damien. The boy's nanny hangs herself at his birthday party; a strange priest brings dire warnings to Thorn; a children's trip to the zoo results in a panicked frenzy; Damien becomes hysterical during a drive to church; and blurred movements in a series of photographs portend shocking deaths. Then tragedy strikes closer to home. It's apparent that Damien is the long-prophesized Anti-Christ. Now, Thorn must make the ultimate sacrifice to prevent the unspeakable terror that awaits the world.

Flixster Users

53% liked it

321,816 ratings

Critics

26% liked it

158 critics

R, 1 hr. 45 min.

Directed by: John Moore

Release Date: June 6, 2006

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: October 17, 2006

Get It:

Stats: 16,871 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (16,871)


  • September 30, 2009
    It?s a rubbish remake of a fantastic film. It does not improve on the story in any way. It does have some good turns by Thewlis, Farrow & Postlethwaite but they are fighting a losing battle when up against a talentless director, a kid that isn't scary and the pain to watch that i...( read more)s, Julia Stiles. Stop remaking and make something new!!!!
  • October 10, 2008
    Why? Why present a remake so faithful it almost shot for shot and word for word. Even terrible dialogue such as "She's pregnant" " I'm afraid not" remains. Coming from a doctor in todays day and age that is pretty disgraceful. Why not just stick your tongue out and go "Na na nee...( read more) na na". The "updates" include an internet link replacing a newspaper and the tricycle now becoming a scooter. Where before Damian was creepy and evil hidden behind young innocence, here the film tries so hard to slap you across the face with him being the son of the devil. He is pale, really pale, has cold dead eyes and a haircut from the 70's version. On the plus side the acting is brilliant and at times improves on the original. Schreiber especially is a realistic father and ambassador who plays his emotions close to his chest. Stiles, Thewlis, Farrow are all great so it's a shame they are not given some new and interesting material to tackle. The film also looks good, brimming with a grim and bleak atmosphere and aesthetic that supports the story with all its might. It will be a pointless watch for those that have seen the original but should be above other horror for new comers.
  • August 20, 2008
    As I general rule, I am not really a fan of remakes. Especially those of the horror genre. I consider myself an avid horror movie fan. I would rate this movie, right up there with the remakes of The Amityville Horror and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. They all seemed to pale in com...( read more)parison to their 1970s counterparts.
    This film tried very hard to be a doppelganger, to Richard Donnor's 1976 classic. They changed almost nothing, from the original script and the acting was appalling. Even Mia Farrow's role as Mrs. Baylock didn't give this film any saving grace. For me, if I am going to watch her in a horror film, it will be Rosemary's Baby.
    This film proved one constant to hold true - You should not mess with a classic.
  • August 9, 2008
    Painful and pointless shot for shot remake just go back to the 1976 version so much better!
  • July 3, 2008
    "The son of the devil will rise from the world of politics."


    Considering the paranoid religious gibberish pertaining to the release of Richard Donner's 1976 horror flick The Omen, it's scarcely surprising that a remake was commissioned to tie in with the rare

    ...( read more)date of 6-6-06. In the current cinematic age, remakes of horror movies are a fickle beast endlessly being rolled out for money. Only rarely have I witnessed a horror remake that produced decent results (I have yet to see a brilliant remake) such as Zack Snyder's reinvention of Dawn of the Dead. Other remakes such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre have become some of the worst segments of modern cinema. Put very simply, Hollywood has become too lazy to create original ideas, so they're recycling and reusing ideas for an easy profit. The creative team for The Omen were so lazy that the person who penned the screenplay for the original (David Seltzer) was hired to polish his own script for the remake.

    This remake is absolutely futile. In essence, this remake adds nothing but occasionally impressive gory CGI effects, tasteless references to modern disasters (as a way of displaying the fulfilment of some religious mumbo jumbo that supposedly describes the signs of an impending Armageddon) and a more refined visual style. Aside from that it's essentially a word-for-word, almost shot-for-shot remake of Richard Donner's 1976 original with no additional scares. The filmmakers could have expanded the original film...they could have executed an entirely different treatment of the Book of Revelations...instead this is a purely futile duplicate of the original. Sure, some may think that if this is identical to the original than the scares must be the same...right? Wrong! The death scenes are more predictable, Marco Beltrami's score cannot set the creepy atmosphere of Jerry Goldsmith's music, and the cast are mainly woeful.

    The plot is of course identical to that of Richard Donner's 1976 original, except the opening is a little different. The opening of this film depicts activity at the Vatican as the sighting of a comet confirms the world is on the eve of Armageddon. Cut to political figure Robert Thorn (Schreiber) who's racing to the hospital to be with his wife Katherine (Stiles) who has gone into labour. Complications during childbirth leave the child stillborn and Katherine unconscious with permanent damage to her womb resulting in an inability to bear another child. Father Spiletto (Radice), a priest working at the hospital, offers Robert a replacement for his loss: a young child born on the same night whose mother passed away during labour. Believing it is best for his wife's sake, Robert agrees to take the child; raising it as his own with Katherine's oblivious to the situation. Roughly 5 years later, young Damien (Davey-Fitzpatrick) is developing smoothly. But a series of peculiar deaths result in suspicions that the child is in fact the Antichrist - the son of the devil. Robert Thorn then works with photographer Keith Jennings (Thewlis) to discover more about the heritage of Damien.

    The characters are portrayed poorly by a disappointing cast. Liev Schreiber cannot replace someone of Gregory Peck's stature. It's impossible to comprehend the praise that Schreiber received. He's a dreadful actor: emotionless expressions, monotone voice, no intensity in line deliveries. Julia Stiles should never have become an actress. Every time Stiles hauls her oversized cranium into shot, the movie grinds to a screeching halt as the theme of the film flips from proficient thriller to daytime soap-opera territory. Mia Farrow supplies the film with the only terrifying moments (a faint praise) as Damien's demonic nanny. Farrow flexed her only decent acting muscle in Roman Polanski's Rosemary's Baby...roughly 40 years ago! Her time arrived and passed long ago. Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick is not sinister or frightening...he's an innocent little boy who cannot act! In the original, the young boy's facial expressions sent chills down your spine. Davey-Fitzpatrick sends tickles down your spine. David Thewlis was nominated for a Razzie award for 'Worst Actor'. I'm shocked at this because Thewlis is one of the only good actors in an otherwise dreadful cast. Julia Stiles and Liev Schreiber should have received the nominations! Pete Postlethwaite is frequently sincere in the role as a priest trying to warn Schreiber's Robert Thorn of the danger. Unfortunately, even he cannot cover up the flaws in the rest of the cast.

    Overall, The Omen is yet another addition to the disparagingly extensive list of horror remakes that should never have been authorised. Perhaps as a standalone film it'd be a decent horror outing for the genre buffs. For those who've never seen Richard Donner's 1976 original, maybe some satisfaction will be uncovered. John Moore is a competent director who brings an intriguing visual style to the production; however this remake is pointless and there was never an apposite warrant for a remake (apart from the obvious marketing purposes). At the end of the day you end up wondering what the point was. Cinematic déjà vu is the most probable reaction.
  • November 21, 2009
    Entertainer. Strangely when I watched I got scared!!
  • November 18, 2009
    I thought this was actually a really well done remake. It looked beautiful and is just an improvement on the original. Liev Schreiber and Mia Farrow were just amazing and everyone else was good too. I think that at the core, the idea is really disturbing in the fact that the vill...( read more)ain is a seemingly harmless child. How can you kill your son? How can you be sure of anything when it is someone you have loved their entire life? A great question that I think is basically answered in: you can if it's the anti-christ.
  • November 18, 2009
    again, original was better
  • November 13, 2009
    it was really cool though i expected it to be more scarier...and i thought something really scary will happen at the end
  • October 31, 2009
    A LOT of story development, which I was not expecting!

Critic Reviews


November 13, 2006
Nick Schager, Lessons of Darkness

Confirm[s] its pointlessness at every available turn. full review

June 12, 2006
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Not since Gus Van Sant inexplicably directed a shot-by-shot remake of Hitchcock's Psycho has a thriller been copied with so little point or impact. full review

June 6, 2006
Kyle Smith, New York Post

The devil takes care of business in exactly the same way, as if he's reading from the book of Re-Revelation. But director John Moore has added some creepy visuals and assembled an unusually strong cas... full review

June 6, 2006
Kurt Loder, MTV

This new Omen works fine. It has its own look and it plays the story straight, as if this were the first time it was being brought to the screen. If you haven't seen the original movie, this one shoul... full review

June 6, 2006
Claudia Puig, USA Today

Yes, it may be 6/6/06, but was there a reason beyond that to remake the 30-year-old horror classic? full review

June 6, 2006
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

Moore delivers several powerful jolts, stocking the film with potent jump-scares, pacing its two-hour length tightly and bottling the tension that escalates with each new act of satanic cruelty. full review

June 6, 2006
Amy Biancolli, Houston Chronicle

A slavishly literal remake of the satanic-horror standby that elicits laughter, sleep and occasional eye-popped shock but drums up scant real terror. full review

June 6, 2006
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

Compared to Al Gore's new global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, The Omen makes the Apocalypse look comforting and child-friendly. full review

June 6, 2006
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

The Omen is a faithful remake of the 1976 film, and that's a relief; it depends on characters and situations and doesn't go berserk with visuals. full review

June 5, 2006
David Edelstein, New York Magazine

Yet another remake no one needs is The Omen, based on an empty 1976 horror vessel. full review

View more The Omen reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • nrvanagrl
    October 30, 2008
    Good remake! Interested in being in it? Go to http://dareyoutowatch.com/ and watch yourself push Julia Styles over the railing
  • gemxlilchrisloverx
    January 24, 2008
    how is josh hucherson in this ? i didnt see him if eny one knows please leave a comment on my profile im soo confused
    !
  • gemxlilchrisloverx
    January 24, 2008
    this film is way cool me and friend wached itat 12:00 it was a bit jumpy in some places but still cool ~! lol
  • sexygirl15151515
    July 12, 2007
    AND EVERYONE SAID IT WAS GOING TO BE THE END OF THE WORLD!!!!!!!GREAT MOVIE!!
  • NOCLUENOFUTURE
    February 1, 2007
    i thought this would be a really good movie if it wasn't TRYING to be scary it had about to fright that wern't even scary but its a really good story and i love the idea of the omen and the little boy did really well at acting he was an evil little child lol
  • orgi91
    January 22, 2007
    it isn't scary but it takes a rilegion side by wrong way (man cannot defeat dievel by his little power but he must ask for power from GOD)
  • Laarnii
    December 24, 2006
    This movie isnt scary at all. But the movie overall was quite good.
  • harrypotterrox2
    December 2, 2006
    Do u ppl get this? Josh Hutcherson is 14yrs right/ and in the OMEN he is like 6. and he acted in runaway vacation which was realeased in 2006 so woz the omen
  • cyclosarin
    December 1, 2006
    You forgot Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick!

    Also, the film was awesome!
  • chomby70
    November 4, 2006
    Just saw it on the 5th Nov. REALLY FREAKY but at the same wos kool.The granny hangin herself wos horrific.but at the same time was entertaining

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Shrek the Third (Shrek 3)
    Shrek the Third (Shrek 3) (37%)
  • Flushed Away
    Flushed Away (44%)
  • The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift
    The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (46%)
  • First Born
    First Born (60%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Omen : Watch Free on TV


The Omen Trivia


  • A warden for the zoo that was used in this film was attacked and killed by a tiger the day after the crew left. What film is this?  Answer »
  • Which horror film was released on the 06/06/06?  Answer »
  • what movie use this tagline Good morning. You are one day closer to the end of the world. You have been warned   Answer »
  • In The Omen, where was Damien's 666 birthmark?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?