The Queen Reviews and Ratings



  • March 14, 2010
    Helen Mirren earned an Oscar which she very much deserved as the Queen of England. So many actors deserved Oscar nominations it's hard to pick just a couple. Michael Sheen, for instance, who's establishe dhimself already as one of the best actors in business. James Cromwell an...( read more)d Alex Jennings also give excellent supporting performances as husband and son to the queen. Sylvia Syms also is terrific, though her part is small, as the queen's mother whom she turns to for advice. Peter Morgan gives yet another example of his Oscar-worthy writing, marking him as the best writer of our time. With great cineamtography, art direction, and makeup work to make this realistic. Mirren wonderfully portrays the struggles of the Queen as more and more pressure is put on her with the death of Princess Diana and she struggles to keep balance between tradition and modernization, a balance threatened by almost all those around her. Sheen is constantly urging her to move in favor of her public appearance and reputation, though she is determined to put her duty before herself and her selfless motives become criticized by the people. Cromwell and Syms make it clear they are all for sticking to tradition, that Princess Diana will get no special treatment than anyone else of the royal family would or will when they die. Sheen and Jennings, on the other hand, insist on bending over backwards to fit whatever the people want to see. The conflict and compromise that Mirren and the royal family endure is matched perfectly by Morgan's screenplay and Stephen Frears' directing skill. 8.9/10
  • March 11, 2010
    Pretty good. Michael Sheen is the real stand-out for me, playing Tony Blair. Though Helen Mirren is wonderful as always.
  • February 27, 2010
    Both Mirren and Sheen give brilliant performances in this fine portrayal of the royal family surrounding the death of Princess Diana. A great film.
  • February 20, 2010
    The Queen is one of those movies that screams Oscar. Of course that doesn't always mean that it's good. The Queen is solid entertainment, and along the way you might learn a thing or two about U.K. law and tradition that's interesting enough. But at times it also feels a bit like...( read more) it's being shoved down your throat.
    I felt I HAD to like this movie. I mean, a Brit flick surrounding Princess Diana's death with Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II? Help me, Tom Sherak! Mirren is marvelous; one of the rare actresses who only gets better with age. Worthy of the Oscar she won in 2007 indeed, if not for this movie then for previous encounters she was snubbed for. I don't doubtlessly credit this as her best role, however she handles the Queen's royal position with poise and nobility, showing the little emotion her "duty first" policy requires her to.
    Stephen Frears camera makes sure she never reveals too much to the audience as well, using different angles to coat her stiff portrayal of a confused and anguished woman.
    I adored Peter Morgan's script as much as I did his screenplay for 2008's Frost/Nixon. He offers a witty manual that never evolves into satire. The Queen will satisfy lovers of British cinema, and make the rest feel a bit smarter for having sat through it.
  • January 31, 2010
    Helen Mirren is the queen of this movie, however I wished Judi Dench would have recieve the Oscar for her role in Notes on a scandal instead of Helen Mirren for her role in The Queen.
  • January 30, 2010
    Helen Mirren the acting God. Majestic as the role she shouldered.
  • January 25, 2010
    Awesome acting. while the entire movie is just talking I did watch this movie with full attention. Good movie but I wouldn't recommend it for just anyone.
  • January 25, 2010
    I was actually expecting this to be terrible despite the rave reviews and Oscar nominations. The president of my university's film club had been on the set and I saw a physical copy of the script (the cover was ripped off, but I could still tell what it was). Anyway, the script r...( read more)eads horribly on paper. Never had I seen so many ellipses in my life....

    Luckily, it doesn't play out that badly on screen. However, I found nothing remarkable about the film. There is one parallel allegory involving a stag but besides that it's potshots on royal decorum and token displays of various viewpoints. Much like Frost/Nixon, it wasn't terrible, but it wasn't distinguishing in any way. I just don't see the appeal of hyper-realistic renditions of recent news events with understated, not very deep drama surrounding celebrities. I guess I just don't get people. Or critics.
  • January 20, 2010
    eat it BAFTA your just wrong
  • January 20, 2010
    Excellent film. My respect for Queen Elizabeth II shot up 100%.
  • January 13, 2010
    (2006 Director: Stephen Frears) Good reviews on this one! An awful lot of I suppose truth is the word I am looking for--in this movie.
  • January 13, 2010
    well i prefer the real queen, she seems nicer
  • January 9, 2010
    Helen Mirren does a wonderful job as Queen Elizabeth II. Casting is well done except for Prince Charles and Sylvia Syms(lovely actress)who is far too large of a person to play the queens mother but in all fairness anyone would be seeing as how tiny the queens mother was at that a...( read more)ge.

    To me this was a clash of tradition and modernity. The Queen hell bent that the death of Diana should be a private affair while the British public and PM Blair(played by Michael Sheen...this is the second time he's played PM Blair and it wont be his last. He's set to star in another movie where he resirrect's his now familiar prtrayal of Blair while Dennis Quaid will try his hand as Bill Clinton) felt there needed more of a public setting so that the country and the world could grieve. One of the darkest days for the monarchy, I feel it pushed them somewhat into more of the modern world.

    In the end I came away knowing much more about ElizabethII. I can appreciate how difficult it has to be for her balancing her roles as Elizabeth II, daughter, mother, wife, grandmother etc and of course Monarch to the British people. She comes with flaws but then again who doesnt.

    Enjoyed it.
  • January 4, 2010
    This movie made me mad
  • January 4, 2010
    This is absolutely one of my favorite films of 2006 (after Little Miss Sunshine, Babel, Half Nelson, United 93, The Departed, Children of Men and The Pursuit of Happyness, of course). Helen Mirren's tour-de-force performance and Michael Sheen's true charm as Tony Blair drive this...( read more) movie all the way. See it!
  • January 3, 2010
    "One heck of a dame makes one hell of a queen." Yes, indeed Helen Mirren puts on the performance of a life time in this bold but ultimately flawed film. It seem the actors got little leadership from the film's mostly TV director Stephen Frears. Many times the cast doesn't seem to...( read more) be working as a whole, instead each actor being forced draw purely on their own skill and experience to produce their own, single but good performance.

    Despite his lack of direction Frears sure does make some bold moves. He is unafraid to depict anyone of the 'in power' people in the film in a bad light (even though ultimately they all do end up wearing a halo).

    At the end of the day if concentrate on the film's merits, it's fascinating, funny, wicked and to the point. Despite Frear's mistakes this is a must see film no matter whether it's your cup of tea or not. Mirren's performance and the intriguing political themes in the movie are not to be missed.
  • December 24, 2009
    The film is focused entirely on the period of Princess Diana's death and the period upto the funeral a week later. In common with most people from the UK that is something that is very much etched in the memory, so the film does very little in terms of information. I can certainl...( read more)y vouch for it's accuracy although the reaction does seem a little over the top in retrospect.

    Mirren puts in a fine performance as the Queen and you certainly couldn't quibble about the Oscar recognition. Although the historical content is very accurate it is impossible to comment on the accuracy of the royal characters. The film seems to adopt the stereotypical representation of the royals and it is quite possible this is correct. The royals are so detached though that it is hard to say this for sure.

    The film is really about whether the monarchy can survive even though they aren't aware they are under such close scrutiny. I found the film quite entertaining and it's really a docu drama. You can also see little indications that it was originally meant to be a TV film. It will not change your life, but it's reasonably entertaining.
  • December 14, 2009
    Solid performances by Mirren and Sheehan, interesting film.
  • December 9, 2009
    I must admit, halfway through the movie I fell asleep. DO NOT watch this movie after a long day at work. It has the same feel as a documentary. I will watch the whole movie again - the cast was very well picked, the whole concept was perfect. Nothing wrong with it. Just DON'...( read more)T watch it when you are tired.
  • November 29, 2009
    It was okay, I guess. Not mindblowing. Certainly would be more interesting if you care what the royals are up to.
  • November 27, 2009
    good watched it w/ my family!
  • November 25, 2009
    The tragic Days around the death of Princess Diana of wales. This Story provides a behind the walls look at what may have been happening during those days. Her Majesty is always ON! She appears to be always gracious! Some of the other members of the family. . Different Story!
  • November 25, 2009
    eem.... The Queen, i must search...
  • November 4, 2009
    THE TRANSFORMATION
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    Im...( read more)age and video hosting by TinyPic">

    BOTTOM LINE: The movie is great on its own, but Helen Mirren helps elevate it to the spectacular level.

    Any one of us young folks who grew up during the '90s remembers Princess Diana. Everytime our parents turned on the news, there she was, smiling and sometimes getting into more trouble than she needed to. Like the song says, "Girls just want to have fun" and Diana did before unfortunately dying at the far-too-young age of 36. Her funeral was held at Westminster Abbey and millions around the world viewed it from the comfort of their living rooms. This and the royal family's reaction are the bases of "The Queen," a movie that sets out to give viewers a dramatized version of what went on behind the scenes.

    The movie is exquisitely profound, sophisticated, thought-provoking, and overall touching and I'd be hard-pressed to find a better performance in the history of film than that of Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II. She just does everything right. Her reactions to situations are spot-on. She even does the proper facial expressions at the right time. Her attitude is contagious. She plays the part of what would seem to be a bigot well but at the same time makes you care about her. What movie is Mirren not good in? I recently saw her in "National Treasure: Book of Secrets," and while that movie is nothing to talk about for more than a minute, she still was great. Michael Sheen is also terrific as Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. I went and watched some footage of Blair giving various speeches and such and Sheen just has got it down pat. I saw very little differences between Blair and Sheen's 'people's princess' speeches as well as the actual Queen and Mirren's speeches on the day following Diana's funeral. These people did their homework.

    I could see some younger children who weren't around during this timeframe or don't necessarily understand the basics of what it takes to be a politician being bored with "The Queen." I could see some of my own friends zoning out as well. But there is nobody out there who can tell me that, after watching the movie, they didn't notice how great Helen Mirren was. They would simply be lying to me and to themselves. I suggest that you watch "The Queen" and then avoid lying. "HELL YES!"

    Critics who agree:
    Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: "The Queen is a spellbinding story of opposed passions -- of Elizabeth's icy resolve to keep the royal family separate and aloof from the death of the divorced Diana, who was legally no longer a royal, and of Blair's correct reading of the public mood."
    Score: **** (out of four)
    Why I agree: The movie lets you pick a side: do you agree with Blair or do you agree with the Queen? I was somewhere right in the middle.

    David Edelstein, New York Magazine: "The Queen is the most reverent irreverent comedy imaginable. Or maybe it's the most irreverent reverent comedy. Either way, it's a small masterpiece."
    Score: 100 (out of 100)
    Why I agree: I'd go with the reverent irreverant angle. I find it open, honest, and very respectful to the actual happenings.

    Lou Lumenick, New York Post: "All hail the great Helen Mirren, who after her triumph in HBO's "Elizabeth," delivers the performance of a lifetime as that monarch's frumpy, 20th century namesake in Stephen Frear's witty, touching and engrossing "The Queen"."
    Score: **** (out of four)
    Why I agree: After seeing Mirren's performance in the movie, I want to go and pick up the "Elizabeth" miniseries on DVD.

    Claudia Puig, USA Today: "Although this is no documentary, we feel we are getting a glimpse of what went on behind the scenes nearly a decade ago. And the view we get is enlightening, edgily comic, emotionally affecting and profoundly compelling. "The Queen" is majestically captivating."
    Score: **** (out of four)
    Why I agree: Although I think that Mrs. Puig needs to lighten up on the adjectives (wow, my head is spinning), I certainly agree that the film was captivating.

    Ty Burr, Boston Globe: "So good is Mirren, though -- so real does she make this woman whom you and I will never know -- that you sense Elizabeth recognizes the truth of the symbolism even as she finds it a bit much. Taste can carry you only so far, and ``The Queen" is about a woman finally understanding she's a reflection of her people rather than the other way around."
    Score: **** (out of four)
    Why I agree: In the end of the movie, and I'm assuming in the instance of the actual event, I could tell that Queen Elizabeth II was trying to do what she thought was the right thing to do.

    Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor: "Helen Mirren gives the mostly subtly expressive performance based on a living historical figure that I've ever seen."
    Score: 100 (out of 100)
    Why I agree: There's no reason for me to disagree.

    Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune: "The film goes pretty easy on the royals in the end, and it's a flattering portrait of Blair. But it's not credulous. Frears may swim in the political mainstream with "The Queen" but he does so like a champion channel crosser."
    Score: ***½ (out of four)
    Why I agree: Everyone knows that the film, like any movie, is not an exact portrayal of what really happened, but it's a pretty damn good one.

    Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal: "Marvelously smart, funny and entertaining film."
    Score: 90 (out of 100)
    Why I agree: Find me a smarter movie and I'll argue my case against it.

    Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly: "Helen Mirren's allure lies not in finding what's regal in every woman she plays, but in finding what's womanly in every royal."
    Score: A-
    Why I agree: That IS Mirren's allure. I find myself drawn to her performances like a moth to a fire. Let the flames roar.

    Peter Travers, Rolling Stone: "One of the best and liveliest movies of the year - funny and touching in ways you can't predict."
    Score: ***½ (out of four)
    Why I agree: Mr. Travers points out what most of the other critics also pointed out, but he mentions that the movie is lively, which is a sentiment that I share.

    Richard Corliss, TIME: "Mirren, who won an Emmy playing Elizabeth I for HBO, may deserve an Oscar for this ripe appraisal of Elizabeth II."
    Score: 80 (out of 100)
  • November 1, 2009
    great acting by Helen Mirren, lols at the lookalikes in this
  • October 24, 2009
    Add a review (optional)...
  • October 8, 2009
    LETTERBOX. Sumamente bien hecha y matizada a tono con sus sujetos, pero no puede ocultar del todo que se trata de gente poco interesante y banal. / Extremely well made and nuanced according to its subjects, but can't completely hide the fact that these are not very interesting an...( read more)d rather banal people.
  • October 1, 2009
    Once you get your head round the fact that this is not a comedy, you realise it?s a brutally honest portrayal of the turn of events that week in 1997. The acting was top notch! I do wonder if the whole thing with the stag happened though, where did that come from? Hilarious!
  • September 25, 2009
    It's a very slow movie, but Helen Mirren is phenomenal! James Cromwell and Michael Sheen are very good also.
  • September 17, 2009
    An outstanding and very elegant biographical portrait, accurate to the facts. Helen Mirren is amazing (again) and her character is very believable and remarkable. An excellent movie for the year. Well deserved Academy Award.

    72/100
  • September 3, 2009
    i still wonder what elisabeth ll said about it
  • August 27, 2009
    Okay drama. Although Mirren probably didn't deserve the Oscar.
  • August 24, 2009
    This is a story About the relationship between the Queen of England and Tony Blair after the death of Princess Diana. Instead of the saying God Save The Queen, it should be Tony Saved the Queen, that is if this is a true story. The actor who played Tony Blair was outstanding alon...( read more)e with Helen Mirren who played the queen. In the beginning you hate her and near the end you feel sorry for her. And the ending was right, the queen said someday the public would turn on Tony Blair and they did. 3 1/2 stars I have seem to fall into a 3 1/2 star rut.
  • August 24, 2009
    Bored me to death. Didn't even watch the whole thing.
  • August 19, 2009
    boring for me but ok for others i guess if they like anything like that
  • August 15, 2009
    Helen Mirren was a GREAT QUEEN
  • August 13, 2009
    Was ok,but not interesting enough because my mum fell asleep at the cinema watching it.
  • August 7, 2009
    An interesting movie about the queen of England during the tragic death of Princess Diana. You get to see how the British royal family and the British Prime Minister handle the crisis.
  • August 7, 2009
    Good story, but it made me hate the queen of Gr Britain even more.
  • July 20, 2009
    good film helen mirren did a good job as the queen
  • July 13, 2009
    was expecting a boring documentary movie...It was not. This takes you through what happened in the palace when princesess Diana died
  • June 23, 2009
    Good Helen Mirren performance
  • June 22, 2009
    Interesting. Well performed.
  • June 13, 2009
    This is one of the most important films so far this year. It brings back the great sadness of the death of Princess Diana in such a powerful way. I remember the day the Princess of Wales died in that terrible car accident, I was young but it is a moment in time that will stick wi...( read more)th you for life.

    Such emotion came over England... and the world. She was a princess to the people and when she was gone, the people suffered greatly. This movie shows what happened during the days of England's mourning inside Buckingham Palace.

    HM Queen Elizabeth II is a very interesting character and I was shocked to see how she behaves behind the scenes. She is an elegant, tasteful and powerful woman and Helen Mirren not only physically took on this character, but emotionally as well. Mirren became The Queen and gave an amazing performance that cries out for an Oscar.

    This film is definitely a great one and has Oscar written all over it. It has generated a ton of buzz, mostly over Mirren's stunning performance, and I could even very well see this film being nominated for Best Picture. Such an emotional film (emotional in a good way) that shows the true side of the Royal Family and the near-defeat of the Monarchy.

    Go see this movie, it's now playing in theatres. You won't regret it.
  • June 12, 2009
    a great film, less a documentary about a period of pop-culture history, and more a film about dealing with a death in the family, coping with grief, and uncertainty in changing times.
  • June 9, 2009
    Well, you can never do any wrong with Helen Mirren. Just watching her was amazing - she truely became Queen Elizabeth II. The way the story is told is another mark of brilliance. The audience gets a well-rounded view of the situation without any bias, as well as an inside look on...( read more) the British Royal Family during the tragedy.

Summary


The Queen Summary