Featured Audience Ratings

• Jeff "

  
  Sequel to the superior remake of the Japanese horror flick Ringu (titled The Ring) in North America, this sequel is a painful, unimpressive mess of a horror film. The film was poorly constructed and had no memorable, memorable terrifying jolts that made the first film one of the best… More
  Sequel to the superior remake of the Japanese horror flick Ringu (titled The Ring) in North America, this sequel is a painful, unimpressive mess of a horror film. The film was poorly constructed and had no memorable, memorable terrifying jolts that made the first film one of the best remakes in the genre. The Ring Two is a poorly made sequel with a poor plot, bad acting, bad directing and pretty much everything that makes a bad film, bad. The Ring Two was dull, unimpressive garbage that just didn't deliver what the first did, genuine chills. As a horror film, The Ring Two simply doesn't deliver. The script has limitations that prevents the plot to really take off. The acting is terrible with no real performance that stands out. The Ring II was created purely for cashing in on the success of the first, with no apparent thought of trying to create an effective horror film. The end result is a film that fails to tell an effective ghost story, and it ends up being a total mess. As a sequel, The Ring tries to duplicate what the first one did, however the film has nothing interesting to appeal to horror fans. I didn't like the film, and I thought it was an awful film. The Ring Two is yet another sequel that fails to deliver what the first one did, good entertainment. The Ring Two joins many other boring sequels that have failed to deliver the thrills and excitement of the original. As a horror film, this one fails. The plot, directing and acting all are bad; and you'd best avoid this on if you don't want to be disappointed.

• Eric A

  
  Not bad in the way it was made, just bad because you get a been-there-done-that feeling.

• Jim C

  
  The Ring Two is almost unbearable to watch, it sucked. The storyline was very dull and boring. The cast was exaxtly the same as last time, no big difference. The horrors are cheap redone scares of the first one, nothing new. This movie bored me, and was really stupid.

• Alexander D

  
  Some scares, but this one is pointless as a sequel and definitely not as good as the original. The screenwriter should have stuck to scripting an adaptation to the source novel's sequel.

• erika b

  
  Ring 1 is better than ring 2

• Dean M

  
  There are enough spooky moments to keep you watching this film, but slight, sequel.

• Dead A

  
  This was same like before. Not bad.

• Tim S

  
  Terrible movie.

• Conner R

  
  By far one of the worst horror sequels of all time. This was a terrible attempt at recreating the magic of the first film. The characters were turned into a joke and the story was over analyzed and simplified, coming off as an insult to the viewer. It has some of the most far fetched… More
  By far one of the worst horror sequels of all time. This was a terrible attempt at recreating the magic of the first film. The characters were turned into a joke and the story was over analyzed and simplified, coming off as an insult to the viewer. It has some of the most far fetched sequences i've ever seen, including a deer rampage.

• Jason O

  
  Apparently, unlike everyone else, I loved this sequel also...they need a Ring Three!

• Lewis C

  
  I loved The Ring, so it kills me to have to give The Ring Two such low score. Unfortunately, I have to. It wasn't even slightly scary, the story made little sense, and then they added those ridiculous deer to put the icing on the cake. I like to pretend that The Ring Two never… More
  I loved The Ring, so it kills me to have to give The Ring Two such low score. Unfortunately, I have to. It wasn't even slightly scary, the story made little sense, and then they added those ridiculous deer to put the icing on the cake. I like to pretend that The Ring Two never happened.

• Arash X

  
  Has its moments, But Could have been better

• Brian D

  
  Shit!!!!!!

• Luke B

  
  Not a remake of the sequel but a sequel to the remake means this film can examine some fairly original territory. Unfortunately it doesn't. It becomes another investigation and sheds further light but is ultimately pointless. The first film suffered by failing to adapt the story… More
  Not a remake of the sequel but a sequel to the remake means this film can examine some fairly original territory. Unfortunately it doesn't. It becomes another investigation and sheds further light but is ultimately pointless. The first film suffered by failing to adapt the story to an American setting, here the director fails to adapt his skills for an American piece. The film has some amazing special effects, extremely real looking Deer and Water are utilised, unfortunately in the most ridiculous of ways. The deer attack is simply confusing, and the floating water is a real head scratcher. The supporting cast are just left to sit around and add nothing, absolutely nothing, to the story. The ending is nicely shot and dealt with in a calm manner which is refreshing for a horror but then it all just sort of fizzles out.

• _kelly .

  
  cryptic does not mean interesting; in this case it means plot holes the size of Jupiter. plus the visuals are completely uninspiring.

• E.J. B

  
  Suffers from overkill. Samara popping out of somewhere one time is scary. But if she's popping out everywhere, it's predictable.

• Dean L

  
  I give it about a .5 as a horror film and a 2.5 as a comedy. I laughed my way through most of this film as it was true tripe. Once again bolloxwood puts out a watered down version of an Asian classic and slaps a PG-13 rating on it so that it can appeal to the largest demographic.… More
  I give it about a .5 as a horror film and a 2.5 as a comedy. I laughed my way through most of this film as it was true tripe. Once again bolloxwood puts out a watered down version of an Asian classic and slaps a PG-13 rating on it so that it can appeal to the largest demographic. PUH-LEASE! The most disturbing part of this movie was the fact that it involved a child (that always gets to me), but nothing else. Wait until you see the CGI scene with the deer. True Disney style. The first "Ring" was advertised as "The scariest movie since the exorcist." I took the day off to see that one and walked out afterwards thinking, "That was it?" It had a few moments to it, but c'mon now. This one ("The Ring Two") didn't even have those moments. It gets two stars: One because it made me laugh and two because I like Naomi Watts. By the way...why was this version unrated? It should have been unreleased.

• Universal D

  
  scary that's what it's supposed to be that's what it is...

• Lafe F

  
  Highly disappointing sequel. They discarded the cursed video tape plot, which made the first film so special; and went with a possessed-kid plot instead, which has been done in many other films. They then cluttered the film with unnecessary backstory for evil little Ring girl Samara,… More
  Highly disappointing sequel. They discarded the cursed video tape plot, which made the first film so special; and went with a possessed-kid plot instead, which has been done in many other films. They then cluttered the film with unnecessary backstory for evil little Ring girl Samara, as if she didn't have enough from the first film! The mother was faced with a difficult choice to defeat the evil girl. The important deaths weren't even shown onscreen. I felt cheated. I only enjoyed the scene with the army of deer attacking, which was cool CGI.

• Leigh R

  
  Pretty good for a sequel.

Read all 20 featured audience ratings