Ann Todd, Cedric Hardwicke, Charles Carson, Derrick DeMarney, Edward Chapman ...( see more  see more... ) , Margueretta Scott , Maurice Braddell , Pearl Argyle , Ralph Richardson , Raymod Massey , Raymond Massey , Sophie Stewart

Based on H.G. Wells's speculative meditation on the price of progress, this 1936 English science-fiction epic shows the painterly touch of director William Cameron Menzies, an American whose career in...( read more  read more... ) art direction and production design, as well as uncredited directorial work, attached him to such visual triumphs as Gone with the Wind, Alexander Korda's sumptuous 1940 Thief of Baghdad, and Menzies's better-known SF achievement as director, the original Invaders from Mars. Things to Come traces a generational saga that begins, presciently, with a global war that outlives its own political purpose, unraveling society to a Balkanized world of isolated communities. In the wake of a subsequent, devastating plague, a new technocracy arises, evolving toward Menzies's striking vision of vast, subterranean cities, rendered in matte paintings building on then-contemporaneous art-deco "streamlined" aesthetics. Driven more by theme than plot, Things to Come lacks the sheer momentum of other Wells classics brought to film (The Invisible Man, War of the Worlds, and The Time Machine, among them); but Menzies's bold look and a strong cast including Raymond Massey, Ralph Richardson, Cedric Hardwicke and a young Ann Todd explain the film's enduring appeal. --Sam Sutherland

Flixster Users

55% liked it

1,384 ratings

Critics

95% liked it

20 critics

Unrated, 92 min.

Directed by: William Cameron Menzies

Release Date: January 1, 1936

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: February 1, 2000

Stats: 98 reviews

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (98)


  • January 1, 2008
    This early sci-fi film, based on an H.G. Wells story, is a good try, but not the classic I had been led to believe it is. Decent special effects for the 30's, and some nifty futuristic machines (I'm sure courtesy of Wells), but especially hammy acting by the leads (Raymond Massey...( read more), Ralph Richardson, et al) and truly horrendous costumes (seemed to cover every time period between the Bronze Age and The Jetsons, at times within the same scene) really distracted from my enjoyment.
  • August 26, 2007
    at its time of release this was probably a big screen blockbuster with all the latest effects. the book by HG wells is probably better than the movie. it was okay but there were moments where my attention was drawn away by the most random of things going on around me other than t...( read more)he tv screen
  • September 28, 2009
    This film has a lot of pro's, as well as con's. In 1936, it must have been amazing, and it certainly gets a lot of points for that. It also has vivid imagination. However, it does not hold up the test of time very well. It has such vision and scope, it will always be fascinating.
  • July 29, 2009
    a masterful work of early science fiction. while it doesn't pack the same kind of punch as Lang's Metropolis, it still manages to incorporate powerful themes like the cost of progress, the effects of war, and political ideology. the special effects for 1936, though, are still p...( read more)retty impressive and the orchestral score is also quite enjoyable. for HG Wells, the story seems much too choppy and episodic and the dialogue is passable at best--thus the film is very difficult to get through because continuity and development are so sub-par. overall a landmark sci-fi film that's better than a lot of B-movies made 15-20 years later, even if it isn't the easiest to watch.
  • January 1, 2009
    Classic science fiction film penned by the godfather of science fiction, H.G. Wells.
    This movies covers a period of 100 years so, it's very episodic. The characters are nothing great but, the special effects and set designs are very nice to look at.
    Because of it's episodic natu...( read more)re, the movie manages to touch on many of the sub-genres of science fiction: the disease that wipes out man kind (like '28 Days Later' without the zombies), fall of technology tribes emerge (like 'Mad Max2: Road Warrior' without the cool action scenes) and man's first steps at conquering space.
    I wouldn't say this movie is entertaining to watch but it is interesting to see what science fiction films used to look like.
  • December 21, 2008
    HG wells atheistic, crappy and futuristic adventure.
  • May 2, 2008
    God help me, I couldn't do it. I tried watching Things to Come 6 times and each attempt was more painful than the one before. If you take Metropolis and removed every positive aspect of it (with the exception of set design) Things to Come is what you'd end up with. The sound was ...( read more)horrible and trying to comprehend people overacting on top of it was just too much. The outfits were great in a "what the fuck were they thinking" kind of way. When I decided to shut it down, all I could do was lement the hard drive space Things to Come ate on my DVR.
  • December 8, 2007
    A brilliant piece, both for the time and for all time itself. Something that should not be forgotten and remembered well. Amazing atmosphere, astounding visuals, and some amazing special effects. Rather than feeling like some...1930s "attempt" at science fiction, this set a stand...( read more)ard for decades. Wonderful and most certainly worth seeing for any lover of Sci-Fi, Film, or Big Guns.
  • November 6, 2007
    Some remarkable special effects to be found here considering its age and if you like Art-Deco (and I do) you'll be in heaven with the design of this film. The performances are adequate but a bit pompus and, despite some very accurate predictions in the early parts, the "science s...( read more)aves all" theme gets heavyhanded in places and bogs the film down somewhat. The visual spectacle more than compensates for these shortcomings though.
  • October 27, 2007
    Entertaining film about what might have been. Again this is another film where my favourite aspect is Bliss's score, esp. the overture.

Critic Reviews


Comments


This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Things to Come" !

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Time Machine
    The Time Machine (0%)
  • Aelita - Queen of Mars
    Aelita - Queen of Mars (0%)
  • Metropolis
    Metropolis (60%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

Things to Come : Watch Free on TV


Things to Come Trivia


  • What movie does the following quote come from: " Has the fact that you're completely psycho managed to escape your attention?"   Answer »
  • quote: 'I don't mean to toot my own horn, but if Jesus Christ lived in Chicago today, and he had come to me and he had five thousand dollars, let's just say things would have turned out differently. '   Answer »
  • in which move does kate hudson come to work in a scary house that it has happening weird things?  Answer »
  • How do the pod things in 'War of the Worlds get to earth?  Answer »

Movie Quizzes


No quizzes for Things to Come. Want to create one?

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin


No skins yet. Interested in creating one?