Rate It

Seen it:    
Not seen it: 
Review: 
 
clear rating

Share It

Rating Averages

My Friends Not rated. () Want To See Not Interested
All Flixster 3.5 Stars (210) Want To See 114 Not Interested 908
Female 3.0 Stars (57) Want To See 31 Not Interested 247
Male 3.0 Stars (153) Want To See 83 Not Interested 661

More Like This

Tip

If you liked this, then you'll also probably like...

Got another recommendation for someone who liked this movie? Add it to the list!

Got an opinion? Use the buttons to vote on all the suggestions people have added.

If lots of people vote, the best suggestions will rise to the top.

Aelita - Queen of Mars (0%)
Metropolis (60%)
The Time Machine (0%)

Plot: Based on H.G. Wells's speculative meditation on the price of progress, this 1936 English science-fiction epic shows the painterly touch of director William Cameron Menzies, an American whose career in...( read more read more... ) art direction and production design, as well as uncredited directorial work, attached him to such visual triumphs as Gone with the Wind, Alexander Korda's sumptuous 1940 Thief of Baghdad, and Menzies's better-known SF achievement as director, the original Invaders from Mars. Things to Come traces a generational saga that begins, presciently, with a global war that outlives its own political purpose, unraveling society to a Balkanized world of isolated communities. In the wake of a subsequent, devastating plague, a new technocracy arises, evolving toward Menzies's striking vision of vast, subterranean cities, rendered in matte paintings building on then-contemporaneous art-deco "streamlined" aesthetics. Driven more by theme than plot, Things to Come lacks the sheer momentum of other Wells classics brought to film (The Invisible Man, War of the Worlds, and The Time Machine, among them); but Menzies's bold look and a strong cast including Raymond Massey, Ralph Richardson, Cedric Hardwicke and a young Ann Todd explain the film's enduring appeal. --Sam Sutherland

Post it anywhere Link it anywhere

Recent Reviews

  • No rating.
    MCT:
    May 2, 2008
    God help me, I couldn't do it. I tried watching Things to Come 6 times and each attempt was more painful than the one before. If you take Metropolis and removed every positive aspect of it (with the exception of set design) Things to Come is what you'd end up with. The sound was horrible and trying to comprehend people overacting on top of it was just too much. The outfits were great in a "what the fuck were they thinking" kind of way. When I decided to shut it down, all I could do was lement the hard drive space Things to Come ate on my DVR.
  • 3.0 Stars
    MCT:
    April 7, 2008
    Follows the history of a city over 100 years, a World War and a plague or some junk. It's got nice sets and you can tell a lot of it is influenced from Fritz Lang's Metropolis. The actors are alright but they tend to be like most British actors from the '30s, very very boring.
  • 2.5 Stars
    MCT:
    January 1, 2008
    This early sci-fi film, based on an H.G. Wells story, is a good try, but not the classic I had been led to believe it is. Decent special effects for the 30's, and some nifty futuristic machines (I'm sure courtesy of Wells), but especially hammy acting by the leads (Raymond Massey, Ralph Richardson, et al) and truly horrendous costumes (seemed to cover every time period between the Bronze Age and The Jetsons, at times within the same scene) really distracted from my enjoyment.
  • 4.5 Stars
    MCT:
    December 8, 2007
    A brilliant piece, both for the time and for all time itself. Something that should not be forgotten and remembered well. Amazing atmosphere, astounding visuals, and some amazing special effects. Rather than feeling like some...1930s "attempt" at science fiction, this set a standard for decades. Wonderful and most certainly worth seeing for any lover of Sci-Fi, Film, or Big Guns.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    November 6, 2007
    Some remarkable special effects to be found here considering its age and if you like Art-Deco (and I do) you'll be in heaven with the design of this film. The performances are adequate but a bit pompus and, despite some very accurate predictions in the early parts, the "science saves all" theme gets heavyhanded in places and bogs the film down somewhat. The visual spectacle more than compensates for these shortcomings though.
  • 4.0 Stars
    MCT:
    October 27, 2007
    Entertaining film about what might have been. Again this is another film where my favourite aspect is Bliss's score, esp. the overture.
  • 2.0 Stars
    MCT:
    August 26, 2007
    at its time of release this was probably a big screen blockbuster with all the latest effects. the book by HG wells is probably better than the movie. it was okay but there were moments where my attention was drawn away by the most random of things going on around me other than the tv screen
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    August 15, 2007
    H. G. Wells at his technocratic best. Prophetic as ever, this film (Made in 1936) starts with a surprise air attack on a fleet in port as the beginning of a second world war, which ends in atomic weapons being used.
  • 3.5 Stars
    MCT:
    July 14, 2007
    Be warned this is most likely on Flickster under a couple of other names. (IE - The SHAPE of Things to Come) I loved this when i was a kid. Right next to "It the Thing From Outer Space ( 5 titles)

My Friends Said...

Things to Come Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Comments

This board looks lonely. Be the first to talk about "Things to Come" !

Details

  • Rated: (Unrated)
  • Directed by: William Cameron Menzies
  • Genres: Art House & International, Science Fiction & Fantasy, Classics
  • Released: January 1, 1936
  • DVD Released: February 1, 2000

Recent News

Movie Skins

Movie Quizzes

Things to Come Quizzes

No quizzes for Things to Come. Want to create one?

Video Clips

Things to Come Video Clips

No video clips yet. Want to upload one?