Featured Audience Ratings

• Mike S

  
  How do you rate something that is so awesome and so cheesy at the very same time? From a technical and visual standpoint, it's a mind-blowing action-fest. Bay has heeded well to James Cameron's advice and made the coolest 3D feature since <i>Avatar</i>. But while… More
  How do you rate something that is so awesome and so cheesy at the very same time? From a technical and visual standpoint, it's a mind-blowing action-fest. Bay has heeded well to James Cameron's advice and made the coolest 3D feature since <i>Avatar</i>. But while the SFX are virtually flawless, the script and set-up is anything but. The first half contains so many pointless gags and ridiculous scenes, that it's impossible not to cringe at its sheer stupidity. They've also humanized the robots far too much, by giving them personalities and accents that strip away their dignity. The acting as well is way over the top, which is particularly noticed on Shia's exaggerated reactions. I blame it on faulty directing though, as opposed to LaBeouf doing a bad job. And of course, in the end, there's the obligatory U.S. flag waving proudly in the wind. You love your country Mr. Bay, we get it already. No need to shove it down our throats along with outworn speeches of freedom. Despite all the mentioned misfires, however, it still amounts to a fun experience. See it for the jaw-dropping action and just try to ignore everything else. For when all is said and done, it does serve its purpose as a dumb, but enjoyable popcorn flick.

• Joseph M

  
  A

• Sanjaya &

  
  Michael Bay really need to stop thinking about making another Transformers movie, I'm serious.. Not only just because this third movie sucks, but he always had reasons to make up another story sequel after sequel.. Revenge of the Fallen were okay, in some fact it might a little… More
  Michael Bay really need to stop thinking about making another Transformers movie, I'm serious.. Not only just because this third movie sucks, but he always had reasons to make up another story sequel after sequel.. Revenge of the Fallen were okay, in some fact it might a little more interesting rather than the first movie, but Dark of the Moon were completely out.. There's a lot of Michael Bay trying to mixed in here but IMHO that doesn't make any sense at all.. Like mixing the first approach a man ever made to the moon with some cybertron's secret, well good try but definitely not solid.. When some of the technology he tried to made in here like how a man can fly, how optimus suddenly can fly, and how most of everybody that watching this movie wasn't feel like fly while watching it? The performance from the cast were just okay, not good not that bad, except for Rosie Huntington-Whiteley since she only care about her looks.. Overall, the story could've been made more better with the unbelievable loss for Megan Fox (even though she's no better from Rosie, but at least she's already been a mascot for this movie and way more a 'useful' girlfriend) =p

• Eugene B

  
  A slight improvement from its predecessor indeed. Just when you thought Bay couldn't topple his CGI works, he brings out this film. Stunning and mind blowing effects and action illustrates dominance throughout, but once again is brought down by the struggling script. 4/5

• Adam K

  
  Impressive effects as always, but Michael Bay cannot and it seems will not produce another good film in the Transformers saga. The third instalment in the Transformers film finds more a repeat of the first then the second. Whilst the original sequel, 'Revenge of the Fallen'… More
  Impressive effects as always, but Michael Bay cannot and it seems will not produce another good film in the Transformers saga. The third instalment in the Transformers film finds more a repeat of the first then the second. Whilst the original sequel, 'Revenge of the Fallen' was the worst film I believe has ever been made, this third one does produce a slightly better hint of a plot and emotion. The explosions and action are all there as usual, and in true Bay style, too frequent and far too much. When the emotion does come along it is wrecked by the previous two hours of non-stop explosion, after explosion, after explosion... With a new central female protagonist alongside Shia Le Beouf as well, we see a slightly better performance by Rosie Hungtington-Whiteley than Megan Fox. But Sam Witwicky's parents as usual steal the show in well performed and perfectly timed small appearances and anecdotes. Overall however, as usual the film disappoints and disappoints. 'Transformers' the first was good, but then the sequel came along. Whilst 'Dark of the Moon' will never be able to rebuild the damage of the second, and in itself is a pretty poor film, it is better than its predecessor by a little way.

• Michael E

  
  As you guys may know Transformers is one of my top 5 favorite movies, the action was great, the visuals fantastic, plot great, everything was flawless, so when I heard they were making another movie i got hyped as hell. It Blew, it seemed like more of a parody of the first than a… More
  As you guys may know Transformers is one of my top 5 favorite movies, the action was great, the visuals fantastic, plot great, everything was flawless, so when I heard they were making another movie i got hyped as hell. It Blew, it seemed like more of a parody of the first than a sequel, so when they announced another sequel I wasn't completely interested but when i saw the trailer, MIND BLOWN. So naturally I got hyped again, and today I finally saw the movie I named the number 1 movie to see this summer, and guess what it was awesome!!! I have to say this movie is the most gruesome thing ive ever watched, ill have to give away most of the plot because its impossible to write this and not talk about the plot. One warning about this movie NOBODY GOOD AND BAD DIES A SIMPLE DEATH. This movie is emotionally powerful if you have seen the other two movies, mainly because they kill off 5 main characters, not simply, BRUTALLY. You know Ironhide from the first two movies that has cannon hands, killed by a Autobot Betrayer (Voiced by Leonard Nimoy) and he F*CKING DISENTIGRATES. The movie is just way to hard to describe without giving anything away but i have to say it is a spectacle and a worthy successor to the first movie, the only problem i have with the movie is that the film has way to many unnessecary scenes and dragged the movie on a little to long, but the apocalyptic scenery and the ending hour of fighting is fantastic to watch.

• Tired of P

  
  Directed by Michael Bay, Paramount Pictures, 2011. Starring Shia LaBeouf, Josh Duhamel, John Turturro, Frances McDormand, et al. Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi. Question: Did your mom ever tell you she walked to school, uphill both ways, and in the snow when you complained… More
  Directed by Michael Bay, Paramount Pictures, 2011. Starring Shia LaBeouf, Josh Duhamel, John Turturro, Frances McDormand, et al. Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi. Question: Did your mom ever tell you she walked to school, uphill both ways, and in the snow when you complained about walking somewhere? I got very close to saying something like that when I told my kids I was taking them to see Transformers: Dark of the Moon but they complained when I told them we were going to walk to the movie theater. "Ugh. No! Mom, come on. Do we have to?" I kept silent for a moment - collected myself and simply said, "Yes." I could have told them I really wanted see the newest Ewan McGregor movie instead but decided not to. What we do for our kids - oh, the sacrifice...OK, just kidding. I really wanted to see the latest installment of the Transformers series. Yes, I am movie geek! I will admit it - proudly. (But I am still going to see that other film!) The first Transformers was fantastic; I would have given it a 9 out of 10 and have watched it many times since. The second one was so bad that I refuse to talk about it anymore. But I just had a feeling the third installment would work. I was right. Transformers: Dark of the Moon got back to what made this franchise good - a story not just gimmicks. Now, the story isn't as well-rounded as the first but it worked for me. (Although my daughter said there wasn't really a point. My son's reply to that "Yes, there was - fighting robots are cool! And you didn't even see the first two!" Her rebuttal "Yes, I did. I still didn't see the point!" She rolls her eyes. I sit there observing, silently laughing inside because both are sort of right.) Now before I go any further in this review I have to tell you that the movie is over 2 1/2 hours long and that doesn't include the 6 (yes, 6) previews we saw beforehand. So you will be sitting down for almost 3 hours. Stretch those legs. The movie started out with history of the Autobots coming close to earth and how we, or a select few, knew of their existence from over 50 years ago. It was a plausible concept. Then it heads to the main character: Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) graduated from college, looking for a job and shacking up with another hot girl. Yes, this point always had me perplexed but his mother begs the question in the story on this little unexplained detail. It is one we may have all thought about on how this semi-nerdy guy with an Autobot for a car gets all these hot women. Let's just say you wouldn't want your mother to say it about you. I laughed out loud at that scene - and am so happy it went way over my children's head. Whew! There is no need to say anymore about the plot because it is jammed packed with a ton of detail that you should see for yourself - especially if you are a fan of these movies. Many sequels lose me when they show little restraint: too much action, too much of a character, too many attempts at humor. There is a fine line to using these tricks of the cinema and Transformers did it perfectly. The second did the opposite. Transformers: Dark of the Moon used many of the qualities that I liked, sparingly - to a point. Shia LaBeouf was just as nerdy and spastic as ever with a slight roughness that makes his character very likable. Josh Duhamel is back but not as powerful of a character as the first movie. Of course, we have John Turturro back and he may have jumped over the shark a few times but it was a good balance to the new character played by Frances McDormand. Now I love her. She is in many Coen Brothers films. She is a character actor that can play anything but mostly strong but off-beat women. (Remember Fargo?) However, her character in this film missed what I usually adore about her (except at the very end). There was a surprise character or two, which I will remain mum about. I will tell you that a huge smile emerged when I saw them though. I wasn't expecting these actors at all- and don't go IMDb it. Be surprised, people. The list of others actors in here is too long to mention now but the other characters in Transformers: Dark of the Moon that made this movie worthwhile was the Autobots and Decepticons. Seriously, what geek doesn't love them? There were some new additions to the changeable robots which I rather enjoyed. I have to say there was a Scottish Autobot - so I got my Scottish fill even though it wasn't with Ewan McGregor - it will do. I couldn't understand a word it said but I liked the accent anyway. In fact, most other new Autobots sounded like they were British, but I read one review yesterday and they said there was a French Autobot. I didn't hear that accent. Oh well. The main new Autobot, Sentinel, was voiced by a very famous actor. Trust me you should get the voice in the first 30 seconds. And if you don't - you cannot call yourself a true geek! That is all I am saying about that. I am not sure if this movie is for everyone but I know teen boys everywhere will love it - especially the slow motion robot changes. That might have made the movie for me. Also, and I can't believe I am about to say this: go see it in 3D. Those annoying little glasses made the whole 2 1/2 hours totally engaging. But be prepared for a lot fighting scenes and cool robots changes - it fills up the last third of the movie. Remember I said this was 2 1/2 hours long. I was simply exhausted by the end of it but my son wasn't. And we still had to walk home. My favorite thing: Slow motion action scenes. My least favorite thing: Perhaps a few too many characters trying to be funny. Rating: PG-13 Length: 157 minutes Review: 6 out of 10 Random thought: As we were sitting there through the previews I had my eyes focused on the ground, of course. I saw both my kids watching intently until the preview for the final Harry Potter came on. My son covered his eyes with his hands and held them there for the whole time. I asked him afterwards why he did that. His reply, "Mom, I really want to see that movie!" Makes a mama proud!

• Sam B

  
  Slightly better than the second movie, but retains all of its problems - Massive implausibility, annoying characters, forced comedy and unnecessary romance. It's a good thing it looks so good.

• Jason C

  
  I really wanted to like this movie. I'm not sure why I thought I would, I really despised the first sequel. The third chapter isn't much of an improvement. These movies spend way too much time following the lives of a bunch of stupid, phony, and annoying simpletons. I… More
  I really wanted to like this movie. I'm not sure why I thought I would, I really despised the first sequel. The third chapter isn't much of an improvement. These movies spend way too much time following the lives of a bunch of stupid, phony, and annoying simpletons. I hate every human character in the film, they should all have their brains bashed in. The movie should focus on the machines, but the writers obviously aren't competent enough to pull that off. Outside of Megatron, Sentinel, Optimus, and Bumblebee, the rest of the machines are basically interchangeable. It makes for a jumbled mess. There are some scenes that are cool because they're big and loud. But I've seen "big and loud" done better too. This is effort was asinine. Avoid.

• Scott G

  
  A third transformers makes life better, well done to Micheal Bay. Strong action sequences and some powerful scenery makes you forget that Megan Fox left.

• Albert K

  
  Let me get this out of the way, I've hated every single Transformers movie. The franchise has built its identity through the spectacular visuals and action it has. Dark of the Moon is not much different; literally, everything is shot and planned to be a treat for the eyes.… More
  Let me get this out of the way, I've hated every single Transformers movie. The franchise has built its identity through the spectacular visuals and action it has. Dark of the Moon is not much different; literally, everything is shot and planned to be a treat for the eyes. Doesn't sound bad but when the movie has a horrible screenplay, bad pacing, sourly unappealing humor, and a no-namer casted just for her looks, it destroys the movie. I've gotta admit: The action is intense and well shot; Michael Bay has always had a good eye for action (cause he's been doing it his whole damn life). Even looking at this movie from strictly a B-movie standpoint, it fails to deliver entertainment throughout the movie. What I will say though is that Dark of the Moon is the best of the 3. The action is much easier to follow and is much more entertaining. Plus, it isn't as forgettable as Revenge of the Fallen.

• Directors C

  
  Why does everyone buy into this loud, annoying head banging drivel. Megan Fox and Shial laBeouf are not good actors. Plain and Simple. Neither is her replacement. Plain and Simple. Robots fighting robots isn't a coherent plot. Plain and friggin simple. I would definetely compare… More
  Why does everyone buy into this loud, annoying head banging drivel. Megan Fox and Shial laBeouf are not good actors. Plain and Simple. Neither is her replacement. Plain and Simple. Robots fighting robots isn't a coherent plot. Plain and friggin simple. I would definetely compare Dark of the Moon easily to Pirates of the Caribbean 4. What Pirates and Transformers have in common is that they are both never ending franchises and their films are made, or should I say designed as if they were brought to life on mechanical conveyer belts. The reason why this movie is similar to Pirates 4 is because it attempts to create a storyline but fails miserably because of a simple run out of ideas to follow it's predecessors. Which is then replaced by ungodly, noisy and annoying action sequences that go on from here to China. Pirates 3 was just an unethically long pile of crap. Transformers 2 was just as bad. Transformers 3 much like Pirates 4 with its predecessor. Better...but still so bad.

• Thomas J

  
  OMG!!! Robots fighting, fighting and fighting is not a story! I did enjoy Megan Fox's absence!

• Cynthia S

  
  AAAAWE! What happened to all the comedy in these films? There were some giggles, but much, much less than the other movies. Apparently, that was a big part of my draw. My husband enjoyed the action of it all...me not so much. I could not tell the difference between the good machines,… More
  AAAAWE! What happened to all the comedy in these films? There were some giggles, but much, much less than the other movies. Apparently, that was a big part of my draw. My husband enjoyed the action of it all...me not so much. I could not tell the difference between the good machines, and the bad in the battle scenes for the most part. Too much of that for me, I guess. I am disappointed.

• Chris W

  
  This is the third, and (let's hope) final film in the live-action Transformers series. I mean, sure, the Transformers are cool, but I can only take or want so much of this stuff, and this isn't really great cinema, even for loud, expensive, action spectacle standards. As far… More
  This is the third, and (let's hope) final film in the live-action Transformers series. I mean, sure, the Transformers are cool, but I can only take or want so much of this stuff, and this isn't really great cinema, even for loud, expensive, action spectacle standards. As far as movies that are loud, stupid, and annoying go, this one ranks pretty high. The story this time is yet again centered around the Autobots and Decepticons duking it out for control of a a mystical device that has the power to destroy Earth as we know it. Enough already. Isn't there any other sort of plot they can come up with for these movies? Oh yeah, and once again mankind gets thrown in the middle, with the government playing another crucial role involving coverups and secrets, and that sort of thing. This time however, the Apollo 11 moon landing is involved, and the great Buzz Aldrin does his legacy no favors by making a brief appearance. Here's the thing about this movie: I think I kinda like it more than the second (which isn't saying much), but even then, the movie still finds a way to be the longest entry and still be guilty of some of the same crimes, even though it slightly downplays them. What I mean is, the film is unnecessarily long ,and filled with way too much filler. If all of the stuff going on during the first 90 minutes (primarily the stuff just involving the human characters) were heavily condensed to just bullet points and heavily trimmed up, I'd be a lot happier. There's no reason for this, or the other two films to be somewhere near the 150 minutes mark. Unless of course the exposition is actually good stuff and well done, but that's not really the case. Also, the plots are just ridiculous, and the humans aren't really that necessary. At least Bay gives limited screen time to Sam's parents. They're still painfully dull and unfunny, but at least they're hardly in it. That goes for the rest of the unfunny comic relief. It seems like there is less of it this time around, but even then, it still sucks and is unnecessary. Especially the stuff involving Ken Jeong. He should know better. So should Malkovich. And McDormand. Although I kinda wanna give her a pass because she does have one or two moments I sorta liked, but still. It's painful seeing her waste her time here. Even Turturro who I don't mind giving a pass to seems even less necessary here than before. It's like they felt it wouldn't be the same without him, and that's just dumb. I don't feel like Megan Fox really added much to the first two other than some wooden acting and sex appeal, but it's really saying something when I prefer her to her replacement this time around: Little Miss Surprised Duckface, I mean Rosie Huntington-Whiteley. Having a love interest for Sam isn't necessary either, so why the hell is she here? Why is most of the crap in these movies here? The racist autobot twins Skids and Mudflap are gone, which is nice, but are replaced by a Joe Pesci-esque bot and a Beavisish bot, and that's not much better. Also, why are the NASCAR autobots given Scottish accents? Sure, southern accents would be more obvious, but those would at least make sense. Also, I'm fine with Nimoy voicing Sentinel Prime, but those Star Trek references, especially one of the greatest lines ever, did not need to be egregiously forced in. The movie does do some stuff right, I will give it that. I mean, I am giving it 2 stars. From technical and effects standpoints, yes, the film is top notch, and it's impressive work. But some of the action is still messily edited. I didn't see it in 3D, but at least the film was bright, so that probably helped makes the 3D work halfway decently. There's one great dramatic moment that really showed the filmmaker displaying some balls, and it actually got me caring and invested in the movie, but of course, it's too good to be true and they ultimately pussy out with the sort of twist that makes forgiving audiences go wild when the reveal happens, so that doesn't help, but at least they started doing something good. At least he film does start to cut the crap and devote the last hour or so to balls out acton, but even that gets boring and stale fairly quickly, and the words boring and stale should not come up when duscussing constant scenes of explosions, massive urban destruction, and giant alien robots fighting one another. I shouldn't get bored dur ing a movie like this, but I did, and that's one of the biggest sins a film can commit in my eyes. I'll be hoenst and say i did enjoy the location shooting, and some of the action, but with no heart and soul, it's hard to care about anything in this movie. It didn't seem quite as excessive as the second, but maybe because it's still fresh in my mind. Regardless, you should just skip this one and pray that if another damn movie shoudl be made that whoever helms it will learn some restraint, subtlety, and nuance...even for a film about Transformers. Oh yeah, I didn't even mention the sexism, misogyny, jingoism, and racial stereotypes (without Skids and Mudflap). I don't have the strength to go into it right now. Just know that's it all there, and that the core audience will probably sadly just overlook it because hey, explosions! hot girl! cars!

• Film C

  
  Pointlessly made, if you've seen the first two then you have certainly seen this one!

• Anthony L

  
  Shia LaBeouf was quoted as saying that 'We dropped the ball on the last one, next time we're really upping our game'. So now he's a liar as well as an annoying actor. I have referred to Megan Fox as a blow-up doll before but Rosie Huntington-Whiteley surpasses her… More
  Shia LaBeouf was quoted as saying that 'We dropped the ball on the last one, next time we're really upping our game'. So now he's a liar as well as an annoying actor. I have referred to Megan Fox as a blow-up doll before but Rosie Huntington-Whiteley surpasses her dramatically. If you pause any of her scenes, look close and you can see a valve sticking out of her neck with a tiny 'Keep away from naked flames' label attached. So again, all women are portrayed as sex objects - or are they? No, Frances McDormand has joined the cast to smash any misconceptions that these films are sexist - Mrs McDormand plays a nagging headmistress type instead, so pats on the back all round there. Seriously though, Frances McDormand what are you doing? John Turturro what are you doing? John Malkovich what are you doing? Getting paid very well I hope! Ok, so here is something I liked about the movie. I liked the whole moon story and getting Buzz Aldrin to play himself was a great move. I also liked Leonard Nimoy as the voice of Sentinel Prime although the Star Trek puns wore very thin very quickly. I hated everything else but then it's pretty much the same as the two previous films and I hated them also.

• Stuart B

  
  What a flippin mess! This is the first of the movies I have watched all the way through, purely because I am playing Football Manager at the same time. God awful shit! Acting - ZERO / Story - ZERO / Direction - ZERO / Special FX - 8/10

• Raymond W

  
  Transformers: Dark of the Moon is so long that I lost interest about half-way through. I still can't tell the difference between the good and evil robots and the ones that were supposed to be funny actually annoyed me. The script is cringe-worthy and lacking in depth, but the… More
  Transformers: Dark of the Moon is so long that I lost interest about half-way through. I still can't tell the difference between the good and evil robots and the ones that were supposed to be funny actually annoyed me. The script is cringe-worthy and lacking in depth, but the acting is marginally decent and the special effects are impressive. Dark of the Moon is an over- long, loud, flashy movie that gave me a headache and left me feeling nothing.

• zach l

  
  Seriously? Why does Michael Bay even try anymore? You would think after years of people saying that all of his movies are all action no plot. This movie is a sad blockbuster that makes you question the talent of Mr. Bay and some of his writers. Its running time is long and when its… More
  Seriously? Why does Michael Bay even try anymore? You would think after years of people saying that all of his movies are all action no plot. This movie is a sad blockbuster that makes you question the talent of Mr. Bay and some of his writers. Its running time is long and when its plot is none existant,the visuals aren't enough.

Read all 20 featured audience ratings