Village of the Damned (1995)

Featured Audience Ratings

• Jeff "

  
  The remake of the classic film is mediocre to say the least. The 1960 Wolf Rilla horror classic has been remade by John Carpenter. Given the fact that Carpenter helmed this remake, you'd think the film would be a decent remake. Well, it almost is. Unfortunately with most remakes,… More
  The remake of the classic film is mediocre to say the least. The 1960 Wolf Rilla horror classic has been remade by John Carpenter. Given the fact that Carpenter helmed this remake, you'd think the film would be a decent remake. Well, it almost is. Unfortunately with most remakes, this film shows exactly what's wrong with remaking classic films. Even if it's directed by horror maestro John Carpenter, Village of the Damned is an exercise in mediocrity. John Carpenter has always made great films, until know. With this remake, you can slowly see a great director losing his touch. I personally feel that John Carpenter should have focused more on writing his own horror film, instead of remaking a classic that didn't need to be remade. His efforts succeeded with 1982's The Thing; however this was not to be with this film. This remake is a valiant try, but the result is mediocre. This remake will surely disappoint the most die-hard John Carpenter fan. This remake is pretty bland, and quite unnecessary. Whatever made the classic film great is gone, replaced by a poor script and mediocre acting; this remake really doesn't cut it. The fact that John Carpenter directed this would make any horror fan think that the film is good. Well, it's watchable somewhat, but very much forgettable. The film lacks anything truly scary and it signals the beginning of the downward spiral for the great John Carpenter. I guess even the horror greats tend to lose their inspiration, this remake is proof of that. This could have been a better film, but falls short on many levels. Watch if you're a Carpenter nut, however keep in mind this is a mediocre film.

• Melvin W

  
  Mara Chaffee: Life is cruelty. We all feed on each other, exploit each other in some way to survive.  "Beware the Children" Village of the Damned is an interesting, if not totally satisfying, film. Carpenter remakes a 1960 film of the same name that I am not familiar with.… More
  Mara Chaffee: Life is cruelty. We all feed on each other, exploit each other in some way to survive.  "Beware the Children" Village of the Damned is an interesting, if not totally satisfying, film. Carpenter remakes a 1960 film of the same name that I am not familiar with. I do have to say that for the most part I likes this movie. It has a strong first act that really got me into the movie. The movie tapers off a little as it goes, but I always remained interested, even with a lot of the ridiculousness that does ensue.  The whole population of a small town blackout at precisely the same time, for the exact length of time. When everyone was woken up and things go back to normal, they start to notice that a lot of the women are pregnant. The women are talked into having their babies by a doctor who wants to do research on them. The kids are born and it doesn't take long for their parents and the rest of the townspeople to realize that these little white haired fuckers aren't like the average human. The movie has some problems; a big one in Kirstie Alley, but only one really effected how much I liked the movie. That would be the pacing. The movie felt so rushed. Years would go by in seconds. The story didn't seem to really take hold of me as strong as I was expecting because the movie was in its final act before I really even noticed.  I thought the movie was extremely cool, mostly because of Carpenter's score and his solid directing. I thought there were some weird decisions, but that didn't completely take away from my enjoyment of the film. It isn't among Carpenter's best work, but it is still a solid little horror-thriller.

• AJ V

  
  A pretty good remake, it's got a good cast anyway. The story is as weird as in the first, but sort of brought up to date of course. Still, a remake was not needed, and this movie isn't all that great.

• Martin S

  
  Hmm...I'm not gonna say it was good...but it wasn't really bad. But face it....you can't beat The Bloodening. One of the kids was a good actor...

• David L

  
  Village of the Damned starts one ordinary day in the small American coastal town of Midwich where at precisely 10 O'clock in the morning every living thing faints into unconsciousness. News of the strange phenomenon quickly spreads & government agent Dr. Susan Verner (Kirstie… More
  Village of the Damned starts one ordinary day in the small American coastal town of Midwich where at precisely 10 O'clock in the morning every living thing faints into unconsciousness. News of the strange phenomenon quickly spreads & government agent Dr. Susan Verner (Kirstie Alley) is there giving out orders before anyone knows whats hit them, everyone seems baffled as the area in which the strange occurrence has happened is clearly defined, very odd. Suddenly at six O'clock, four hours after the initial black-out, everything & everyone regains consciousness. However the oddness doesn't stop there as the local quack Dr. Alan Chaffee (Christopher Reeve) quickly realises that a large number of the female population of Midwich are pregnant including the local virgin (there's always one...), pregnancy's that stem from the day of the black-out. The months pass & the babies are born but as they grow into children there definitely seems to be something wrong with them & why are so many of the townspeople having 'accidents' & committing suicide... Directed by John Carpenter I thought Village of the Damned was an OK time waster but it didn't exactly knock my socks off. The script by David Himmelstein was based on the original Village of the Damned (1960) which I have seen & the first obvious difference is that it is now set in an American town & not an English village which was the setting that served the original so well. While the film moves along at a reasonable pace & isn't that boring as a whole I didn't think it worked, the character played by Kirstie Alley for instance seems only to be included so Capenter can use her whenever the need for some scientific exposition is called for even though the origins of the children are never really made clear although the script hints at aliens. Many of the other character's also feel surplus to requirements except to be killed off by the children for the most minor of reasons which never convince, I mean why make your mum put her hand in a pot of boiling water? Think about it, why? There's no reason whatsoever. It's watchable for sure, in fact when I think about it one reason why I may not have much love for this is because I've seen the original which this follows quite closely so the story wasn't particularly surprising & I sort of knew where everything was going. Director Carpenter has a few classic horror & sci-fi films to his name although I doubt Village of the Damned will be anywhere near the top of it. It's fairly ironic when you consider that Carpenter directed possibly the greatest remake ever when he helmed The Thing (1982) which was a brilliant retelling of The Thing from Another World (1951). Unfortunately the children themselves inspire bouts of laughter rather than fear, they look absolutely terrible with white hair & glowing eyes. The film lacks scares & atmosphere & is a bit flat. With a supposed budget of about $22,000,000 I was amazed when I found out, where did all the money go? It looks more like an average made-for-TV film than a 20 plus million Hollywood blockbuster. The acting is so-so, Village of the Damned is probably the only film where you will see Luke Skywalker & Superman together... Village of the Damned is an OK film, I didn't think much of it. The story would probably have made a better X-Files episode rather than a full length feature film.

• Wahida K

  
  Honestly not a tiny bit creepy infact boring too. Was similar to Children of the Corn.

• Anthony L

  
  Unfortunately this Carpenter remake of a classic wasn't as good as The Thing and marks the beginning of his decline. Shame as it has a brilliant cast!

• Jason S

  
  Creepy remake and the cast is really good. I dug this flick and the story is compelling.

• Curtis L

  
  It has Luke Skywalker in it.

• Lafe F

  
  A remake of the 1960 alien children movie, is semi-enjoyable. They've upped the horror effects when some of the adults are killed. The kids are genuinely creepy; the child actors put on chilling performances. It's nice seeing Christopher Reeve as their school teacher. John… More
  A remake of the 1960 alien children movie, is semi-enjoyable. They've upped the horror effects when some of the adults are killed. The kids are genuinely creepy; the child actors put on chilling performances. It's nice seeing Christopher Reeve as their school teacher. John Carpenter's direction adds flavor to the story. His synth-score is great. It feels a bit unbalanced; probably because it's been done before better. It's less convincing that these kids could take over a whole town in the 90's. Not one of Carpenter's classics.

• Dean M

  
  Despite boasting a cast from hell, director John Carpenter's risible update of the 1960 evil children classic is not as woeful.

• Todd S

  
  John Carpenter remakes yet another classic horror movie and again it just doesn't work. When you take a movie based on one that is 35 years old, coming from a book that's even older than that, and you try to adapt it to modern day life, something is going to be off. If it… More
  John Carpenter remakes yet another classic horror movie and again it just doesn't work. When you take a movie based on one that is 35 years old, coming from a book that's even older than that, and you try to adapt it to modern day life, something is going to be off. If it had been set in the time it was written, it would have made more sense, but would still have been a pretty weak story. A massive blackout impregnates the town woman with alien children who can see your thoughts and force you to do what they wish. It's not the best story to begin with. Add to that a group of actors who are passed their prime and really don't want to be doing this film and you get another shit movie that is basically a waste of time.

• Burger S

  
  Horrible!

• Deb S

  
  A small New England Town is invaded by an unseen presence which knocks the inhabitants out cold for a few hours. News of the strange phenomenon quickly spreads and a chain-smoking government scientist Dr. Susan Verner (Kirstie Alley) is there to investigate. A few hours after the… More
  A small New England Town is invaded by an unseen presence which knocks the inhabitants out cold for a few hours. News of the strange phenomenon quickly spreads and a chain-smoking government scientist Dr. Susan Verner (Kirstie Alley) is there to investigate. A few hours after the initial black-out everyone regains consciousness but the local doctor (played by Christopher Reeve) quickly realizes that a large number of the female population are pregnant including the local virgin (there's always one lol), and the pregnancy's seem to stem from the day of the black-out. The months pass and the babies are born but as they grow into children there definitely seems to be something wrong with them. They have incredible psychic abilities, advanced intelligence, yet lack emotion. Where did they come from? What did they want? Guess you'll have to watch to find out the answer to that one.

• Matthew A

  
  This was a rather interesting and mysterious film in the first half with a nice soundtrack, but in the second half just turned into a pure good vs evil. The origin of those mysterious children was not explained in the movie at all. There were theories, but the whole plot was not given… More
  This was a rather interesting and mysterious film in the first half with a nice soundtrack, but in the second half just turned into a pure good vs evil. The origin of those mysterious children was not explained in the movie at all. There were theories, but the whole plot was not given a background whatsoever. Plus those children were starting to get really annoying as villains. This film had some potential, but it didn't exploit it all.

• Lee K

  
  Pretty good thriller, that had me surprised to see Mark Hamill resurface.

• Leo L

  
  Great!

• Patrick D

  
  Mark Fucking Hamill as a priest.

• Barry L

  
  Good but the original black and white was better

• Rose G

  
  it's one those few movies which can creep you out without having to rely on gore. the acting by the kids in this film was pretty impressive since it's really hard to show no emotion at all when doing something so evil. plotwise, it was thought-provoking but for people who… More
  it's one those few movies which can creep you out without having to rely on gore. the acting by the kids in this film was pretty impressive since it's really hard to show no emotion at all when doing something so evil. plotwise, it was thought-provoking but for people who are not into films like this, it might be a bit boring. i haven't seen the original but after seeing this, i don't think i'd be excited about seeing it.

Read all 20 featured audience ratings