Mel Gibson, Greg Kinnear, Sam Elliott

The story of the first major battle of the American phase of the Vietnam War and the soldiers on both sides that fought it.

Flixster Users

84% liked it

181,222 ratings

Critics

62% liked it

141 critics

R, 2 hrs. 17 min.

Directed by: Randall Wallace

Release Date: March 1, 2002

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: August 20, 2002

Get It:

Stats: 8,141 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (8,141)


  • July 6, 2009
    Revisiting this one some seven years after it's theatrical release I find that time has neither lessened nor strengthened its impact. Historically speaking, the events portrayed here are immensely important and heroic. From a technical/theatrical point of view, We Were Soldi...( read more)ers is just off the mark. Instead of depicting the events honestly and unbiasedly, there's an aire of propaganda here that's hard to shake. The film makers could have been a little less preachy and let the gallantry of the soldiers (on both sides) speak for itself, .

    .
  • May 14, 2009
    "They went to war because their country ordered them to, but in the end they fought not for country or their flag, they fought for each other."

    You wanna know why I watched this film in the first place, 7 years ago? Because of the helicopters. Not because of Mel Gibson or the ge...( read more)nre, I do like war films like any other guy, but only because of the choppers. Sadly Mel Gibson is babbling about patriotic and heroicly foolish things almost constantly, but where's my goddamn choppers! I thought this movie was supposed to be about how the US Army started to customize and use MedEvac choppers for infantry transports to hot zones, but all it is, is just another movie that tries too much to be powerful and moving.

    Considering that Randall Wallace, who wrote 'Pearl Harbor' a year earlier, was involved with the film should've had me on alert status. But he has also written 'Braveheart', which is one of my all-time favourites so I had to give it a shot. So now we have, as examples. one great film and one of the worst films ever made. Were does 'We Were Soldiers' belong?

    "I'll never forgive myself.
    - For what, sir?
    That my men... That my men died and I didn't."

    After all the basic training in the movie has been given and the troops are transported to "The Valley of Death" for combat, the film does give some nice battle scenes. Especially the napalm scene where the flesh of the bodies is being ripped off when the medics try to evacuate them. Gory as hell and, yes... effective. The battle scenes are almost too frantic for my taste. Some of the soldiers seem to have some kind of supersenses, they always know where the enemies are and shoot highly accurate shots when they're under pressure and when visibility is nonexistent. Guess the US Army's training is much more on a higher level then other nations armies...

    The acting is.. well, highly overrated. Mel Gibson, in my opinion, does one of his worst performances I've seen and Sam Elliott, as the obligatory NCO, non-commissioned officer, is grunting through the whole movie and showing these rookies how to fight. With a pistol. You see, he doesn't believe in assault rifles... And talking about obligatory characters, there has to be a proper, heroic young officer, like Chris Klein's character, who has a beautiful wife and a child on the way to bring drama to the movie.

    So, where does 'We Were Soldiers' belong? It's highly patriotic and religious, with lots of dramatic scenes that tend to go a bit over the top, some nifty battle scenes but to be honest, films like these are in the end very mediocre and instantly forgettable. There's so much better Vietnam movies available ('Platoon') so if you tend to get sick watching melodramatic war movies where God is a greater support to troops then the artillery or the Air Force, you might wanna skip this one.
  • August 21, 2008
    In a place soon to be known as The Valley of Death, in a small clearing called landing zone X-Ray, Lt. Colonel Hal Moore (Mel Gibson) and 400 young fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons, all troopers from an elite American combat division, were surrounded by 2,000 North Vietnames...( read more)e soldiers. The ensuing battle was one of the most savage in U.S. history. We Were Soldiers Once...And Young is a tribute to the nobility of those men under fire, their common acts of uncommon valor, and their loyalty to and love for one another.

    As a war movie, this was breathtaking, showing heroism on the part of soldiers, which is what war movies do. The ending where Kinnear shows up and zaps the North Vietnamese with Gatling guns. Where were these guns before? The artillery did a great job, and the ability to call in air strikes almost instantaneously was amazing. In the story arc, it was interesting to contrast the Mel Gibson plan, which he learned from the French who did it wrong by being passive, to take the battle to the enemy when they least expect it. If we had not given up politically, we could have won the war in Vietnam. Sam Elliott was his usual great gruff self. Mel was often melodramatic and the women back home were stereotypes and Madeleine Stowe had the world's biggest lips.

    4/5
  • May 2, 2008
    sad
  • February 20, 2008
    Hollywood once more goes through the "war is hell" motions and gives Vietnam the Saving Private Ryan treatment. I cannot criticize the skillful representation of the battlefield, but pretty pictures of men being artfully eviscerated by slow motion gunfire does not a war movie mak...( read more)e. What marks this film is the quite astonishing lack of subtlety and sophistication in the script and direction by Randall Wallace. Mel Gibson plays the kind of superhuman commanding officer who stands shoulder to shoulder with his men and probably blinds the enemy with the glow of his halo. The first 40 minutes of the film are particularly painful, as all the bootcamp cliches are present, interspersed with apple pie images of family prayer and an embarrassing scene featuring the officer's wives that is about as subtle as Father Ted's slideshow that flashed up "NOT A RACIST" at strategic intervals. The men on the ground under Gibson's command are all the kind of fine upstanding Americans who were "glad to give their lives for their country" and gasped "Tell my wife I love her" with their dying breaths. But were not actually important enough to devote any screen time to when it comes to their characters or personalities. The only attempt to show the Vietnamese side of the story was glimpses of their commander, 30 seconds before his orders were preternaturally second guessed by Gibson and at the end when he ran away from the advancing and victorious American soldiers (guess whose version of events this film is based on...) This is exactly the kind of patronising, gung ho John Wayne style flag waver that I thought had been swept away by Coppolla, Kubrick and Stone, summed up for me by the scene when Mel Gibson's young daughter asked him "Dad-dy, what is a war...?" For f**k's sake. I honestly thought that this film would NEVER end.
  • November 18, 2009
    i was watch it in evry weeks...
    thats is a real army film..
  • November 4, 2009
    this is a great war movie...
    thanks god he's not die at last...
  • November 3, 2009
    Tipica pelicula yanqui donde se tiran flores a si mismos y se sienten heroes matando a inocentes.
  • October 31, 2009
    !Comercial or Stupid! :|
  • October 30, 2009
    merita 5 stele,este o adevarata arta a spiritului de sacrificiu si a camaraderiei.

Critic Reviews


March 22, 2002
David Edelstein, Slate

Makes you cry for the hundreds of thousands of men and women who died so pointlessly with Geoghegan. And their orphans. full review

March 1, 2002
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

Mel Gibson fights the good fight in Vietnam in director Randall Wallace's flag-waving war flick with a core of decency. full review

March 1, 2002
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

Though it falls short, it's an ambitious movie that ranges from intense peaks to embarrassing lows. full review

March 1, 2002
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

For much of its length, the movie consists of battle scenes. They are not as lucid and easy to follow as the events in 'Black Hawk Down,' but then the terrain is different, the canvas is larger, and t... full review

February 28, 2002
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Like the best war movies -- and like martial literature going back to the Iliad -- it balances the dreadful, unassuageable cruelty of warfare and the valor and decency of those who fight. full review

February 27, 2002
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Has an impact that transcends politics and some dramatic overreaching by writer-director Randall Wallace. full review

View more We Were Soldiers reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • juliuscaesar3
    March 25, 2009
    "I will be the first on the field and the last off the field"
  • purplethistle89
    January 3, 2008
    ...We will all come home together. So help me, God

    >>That was the best part in the movie!!
    it was wonderfully preformed by Mel Gibson

  • purplethistle89
    January 3, 2008
    Look around you. In the 7th cavalry, we've got a captain from the Ukraine; another from Puerto Rico. We've got Japanese, Chinese, Blacks, Hispanics, Cherokee Indians. Jews and Gentiles. All Americans. Now here in the states, some men in this unit may have experienced discrimination because of race or creed. But for you and me now, all that is gone. We're moving into the valley of the shadow of death, where you will watch the back of the man next to you, as he will watch yours. And you won't care what color he is, or by what name he calls God. They say we're leaving home. We're going to what home was always supposed to be. Now let us understand the situation. We are going into battle against a tough and determined enemy.I can't promise you that I will bring you all home alive. But this I swear, before you and before Almighty God, that when we go into battle, I will be the first to set foot on the field, and I will be the last to step off, and I will leave no one behind. Dead or alive,..
  • broadwaymo
    June 8, 2007
    This site is full of teens that think they know history because they've seen a few movies. Try picking up a book occasionally...
  • santi2se
    April 30, 2007
    i viewed this movie in a different angle..of course it is well acted..and in historical perspective ..it is based on a true story..movie contains bloodletting using weapons and tactics never tried before..in order to achieved and win a battle...winning a battle here is to kill as many enemies as you can..and so in all wars for the losers and the victorious...what can never be measured is the sufferings and pain that is being experienced for all from the combatants to the civilians..what stand out here is the commanders concern for there soldiers..only if the leaders of countries become truly concerns for thier people..then wars could be avoided..
  • wellbrown
    April 19, 2007
    For the person who did say it was a WW2 film, I can see where they are coming from. Apart from the technical details (different guns, clothes, enemy), this was directed very much in the style of a WW2 film; with a style not used in any post WW2 film I have ever seen, and I did not like it at all. I was presented in the mindset of the army generals at the time, i.e if we kill more gooks than kill us, we'll win the war. This message is the very core of the film, the Vietcong were evil and cunning, yet stupid enough not fire at a load of GI's just metres away; and of course, God will help the 'good guys' to the end. This attitude pisses me off to the nth degree, and when it's echoed in a film many years later, where we have learned that Guerrilla warfare was a far better tactic in the dense jungle of Vietnam and even most places, I can't tell you how annoyed I am. Furthermore, the 'victorious' GI's was wiped out from am Ambush later in the week. It didn't say that in the film

    The first half was incredibly boring as well
    end
  • bluejays86rock
    April 7, 2007
    hamburger hill and platoon are better vietnam movies, first blood was stupid movie too, john rambo would have been killed fast if he was actually in vietnam war
  • bluejays86rock
    April 7, 2007
    i thought this movie stunk for a vietnam era movie, i thought this stunk, and to the dork who thought this was a world war 2 movie, lol oh my gawd you are STUPID!!!!!!
  • darandaz
    September 10, 2006
    its an exciting movies of war,war movies lovers would love it.

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Coyote Ugly
    Coyote Ugly (37%)
  • Signs
    Signs (37%)
  • Forrest Gump
    Forrest Gump (57%)
  • A Few Good Men
    A Few Good Men (67%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

We Were Soldiers : Watch Free on TV


We Were Soldiers Trivia


  • In which movie do Mel Gibson and Barry Pepper star in together as soldiers in vietnam?  Answer »
  • In which movie was the main charachter " Lt. Col. Hal Moore "  Answer »
  • Flight Music(4 of 6) In which movie would you hear this music while helicopters are flying?  Answer »
  • In what film would u find the quote "When we go into battle I will be the first to step on the field & I will be the last to step off. I will leave no man behind dead or alive"?  Answer »

Video Clips


No video clips yet. Want to upload one?

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin