Werewolf of London
Want to See
Not Interested
Rate it ½ star
Rate it 1 star
Rate it 1½ stars
Rate it 2 stars
Rate it 2½ stars
Rate it 3 stars
Rate it 3½ stars
Rate it 4 stars
Rate it 4½ stars
Rate it 5 stars
Originally intended as a vehicle for Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi, this Universal production predated The Wolf Man by six years, but failed to whip up audience enthusiasm for the monster popularized by Lon Chaney, Jr. in the studio's later classic. Henry Hull stars as botanist Dr. Glendon, whose foray through Tibet in search of a rare night-blooming "marifasa lupina" ends when he is savagely attacked by man-beast Yogami (Warner Oland). Recovering back in London, Glendon begins to undergo the hideous transformation into a wolf-like monster at the next full moon (courtesy of… More

Available Online

Rotten Tomatoes Score: 75%

Critic Reviews from Rotten Tomatoes

"An abstracted-husband fable to go with the anxious-bachelor comedy of Mamoulian's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde"
‑ Fernando F. Croce, CinePassion
"Intriguing, if slightly stodgy, early werewolf shocker"
‑ James Sanford, Kalamazoo Gazette
"...a 1935 thriller that's one of the most well-crafted and polished suspense movies of the era. The plot blends new components of the werewolf 'legend' with some science-fictional elements."
‑ Mark Bourne, DVDJournal.com
"For my money, Werewolf of London remains the best werewolf picture of all time."
‑ Ken Hanke, Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)
"The combination of uninspiring leads and a somewhat half-hearted script makes it tough going, even at a trim 75 minutes."
‑ Michael W. Phillips, Jr., Goatdog's Movies
"A horror film that would have been better with someone else in the lead. Still, it's a classic."
‑ Bob Bloom, Journal and Courier (Lafayette, IN)
More reviews for Werewolf of London on Rotten Tomatoes