Featured Audience Ratings

• Emil K

  
  Spike Jonze is a creative director and he has built quite a reputation in past ten years as a filmmaker. His feature debut Being John Malkovich was interesting if a bit overrated curiosity but in my opinion his second film, which was called Adaptation, was total a disaster. Now after… More
  Spike Jonze is a creative director and he has built quite a reputation in past ten years as a filmmaker. His feature debut Being John Malkovich was interesting if a bit overrated curiosity but in my opinion his second film, which was called Adaptation, was total a disaster. Now after two films comes the third film from Jonze and one that is also his best so far. Where the Wild Things Are is visually fantastic pice of work and has this emotional rawness that makes it something truly touching to sit through. At it's core this is a heartbreaking story about the end of childhood but it is also so much more. Jonze's approach to Maurice Sendak's source material is fresh and adds nice little details into the story. Of course there has been some expansions made here because Sendak's story is basically quite simple and short. With these expansions writers Dave Eggers and Jonze succeeds. Overall there is nothing to complaint here when it comes to story, actors or the fantastic production and creature design. My personal complaints, which are minor, are mostly towards the film's score that just does not live up to the rest of the film. Karen O is a gifted artist but here her music is mostly distracting when it should be something that pulls you in. There is basically nothing wrong in composer Carter Burwell's sections in music but Karen O's material just sounds too hip and sadly lessens the film's overall impact. Lead actor Max Recors is fantastic as a young Max and all the supporting voice actors does equally impressive work. Catherine Keener and Mark Ruffalo instead does not get enough room to show their talents and their roles are a bit too hollow to become important enough here. Where the Wild Things Are is a film with big heart. It has rare warmth in it and it is equally suitable for kids and adults too. It is no masterpiece but it is a damn fine entertainment with a unique vision in it.

• Kase V

  
  Often moody and somber, Spike Jonze's 'Where the Wild Things Are' is strangely an emotionally hefty film. The pathos created is unexpected, but captures the tone of the film well. I've never seen a film so vividly encompass the emotional roller coaster we call… More
  Often moody and somber, Spike Jonze's 'Where the Wild Things Are' is strangely an emotionally hefty film. The pathos created is unexpected, but captures the tone of the film well. I've never seen a film so vividly encompass the emotional roller coaster we call childhood. A great soundtrack and amazing imagery definitely work in the movie's favor. A solid film, but it ends on a note that really isn't too upbeat, which is surprising for a film about a children's book. Jonze has definitely captured the soul of childhood, but the real question is whether or not he can capture his audience.

• paul o

  
  Its a great Spike Jonze film! The music by Karen O. gives a playful tone for one of the most imaginative films of 2009. Even though the film wraps itself in catharsis behavior which leads to dark scenes for a PG film, there is a heartwarming feeling of nostalgia left at the end of… More
  Its a great Spike Jonze film! The music by Karen O. gives a playful tone for one of the most imaginative films of 2009. Even though the film wraps itself in catharsis behavior which leads to dark scenes for a PG film, there is a heartwarming feeling of nostalgia left at the end of this wonderful piece of cinema.

• Directors C

  
  [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img] I didn't enjoy Where The Wild Things are the first time I saw it, probably because it was so unexpected. I've watched it since and im proud to say that I did enjoy it the second time round. Its far… More
  [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img] I didn't enjoy Where The Wild Things are the first time I saw it, probably because it was so unexpected. I've watched it since and im proud to say that I did enjoy it the second time round. Its far from perfect but it's perfection for telling a story that isn't coming of age but the end of one's innocence.

• Scott G

  
  Not to sound unprofessional but i want one of them monsters.

• Albert K

  
  Wow, "Where the Wild Things Are" accurately depicts the emotions and the thoughts that run through an angry boy in his early ages. The portrayal of such a neglected role in cinema shoots this movie high in my list. The cinematography and the CGI are huge pluses; they create… More
  Wow, "Where the Wild Things Are" accurately depicts the emotions and the thoughts that run through an angry boy in his early ages. The portrayal of such a neglected role in cinema shoots this movie high in my list. The cinematography and the CGI are huge pluses; they create the atmosphere of this movie. Even the most silent moments of this movie create deep emotional stir within the audience. This movie works effectively. There are cons however. The plot of the movie seems to point towards nowhere and the story's interest dips near the middle, but other than that, it is a great movie.

• Graham J

  
  A great adaptation of a childhood favorite. The reason it's great is because it goes off on it's own thing rather than sticking exactly to the book.

• Eliza N

  
  Never been bored to death with movie again so much.Yes, this is for kids,yes, i don't know why people like it and NO i am definitely not recommending it for you or your kids.

• Jim C

  
  Where the Wild Things Are isn't a bad movie, but it is for kids and kids will be scared at this movie, these Wild Things are huge assholes, and I don't want to be on that island. It has a great story, production, so why did I think its not really good. The book was for… More
  Where the Wild Things Are isn't a bad movie, but it is for kids and kids will be scared at this movie, these Wild Things are huge assholes, and I don't want to be on that island. It has a great story, production, so why did I think its not really good. The book was for kids, and the movie is a sad horror movie that scared the crap oy of me sometime, and was disgusting at many moments, it was a good movie, but should not be targeted for kids because they will be frightened, and leave the theatre not feeling the joy of a normal kids film.

• Kristijonas F

  
  A heartfelt children's story that doubles as a raw and uncompromising commentary on a child's emotional complex, Where The Wild Things Are is ultimately an adorable little film that simply reminded me of what it felt like to be a kid. A triumph for Spike Jonze, although it… More
  A heartfelt children's story that doubles as a raw and uncompromising commentary on a child's emotional complex, Where The Wild Things Are is ultimately an adorable little film that simply reminded me of what it felt like to be a kid. A triumph for Spike Jonze, although it does carry a very dark tone and is sometimes very difficult to watch.

• Sam B

  
  Spike Jonze perfectly captures the essence of childhood.

• paul s

  
  A bratty and precocious 8 year old with a fertile imagination rationalizes his life by creating a land where creatures represent his id and ego. That's pretty much the story behind Where The Wild Things Are. The kid is lonely (for some reason he has no-one to play with), and… More
  A bratty and precocious 8 year old with a fertile imagination rationalizes his life by creating a land where creatures represent his id and ego. That's pretty much the story behind Where The Wild Things Are. The kid is lonely (for some reason he has no-one to play with), and for an unexplained reason his father is not on the scene. Ok, so he has issues - that's still no reason for him to be an obnoxious snot nosed holy terror that pouts and acts out when things don't go his way. That's the basic problem with the film in my opinion (one of several). The kid deserved to be grounded for life, not be given an "awww" pass and a later wink, wink, ain't I smart final scene. Once the film moves to the Island of Wild Things, it becomes a bit more interesting, given the large furry characters and the personalities polarized by the understanding of psychology presented by an 8 year old; but that same psychology works against the film, as the dilemmas and character reactions are also based on the imaginings of said 8 year old. The boy, Max, is drawn to the character who most represents himself - the often angry Carroll, voiced by Tony Soprano himself. We first see Carroll destroying the homes of the Wild Things, angry because things simply aren't working out right (he seems to have the equivalent of a pre-pubescent attraction for another character, CW, and gets angry when she quits the group, or decides to expand her horizons by meeting new friends). It's all a way for Max to work out why he is angry when things don't go as he thinks they should - not that the film sees fit to show that he has any kind of epiphany. There is a fear angle as well, which has some merit to it - triggered by a school teacher preaching to his students that the sun is going to explode someday, but not to worry - we'll all be dead via some other disasters by then anyway - what a stupid thing to say to an 8 year old - especially when you're in a position of authority. the film features some nice lighting on the creatures, but day and night kept getting confused for me - I'm hoping that this was intentional, to show that the land Max created was somehow outside the time/space continuum. The story is based on some evidently much beloved children's book. I of course haven't read the source material, though my final analysis is that, while I appreciate the allegorical nature of the story, I can't help but think back upon my own childhood as an only child. I always found neighborhood kids to play with, or school chums who lived close by, so the loneliness angle of the film didn't strike a chord. When I was sent to my room for misbehaving, I used the opportunity to read or listen to records and even though my father was often out of town, didn't feel the need to act out in his absence. So the entire premise on which the film is built runs counter to my own experiences, leaving me disinterested in what the film had to say, and also wondering what age group the film was created for and what message it was trying to get across. I'm sure there's some new age psycho babble, I'm ok, you're ok stuff that makes a certain sense here, but I'm not buying.

• Alexis N

  
  A boy on an island with all the parts of his personality. I didn't think it was going to be anything other than sad. It did make me cry at the end and I'm a tough cookie. but the movie was cute and just beautiful to watch.

• ♥˩ƳИИ &

  
  Cast: Max Records, James Gandolfini, Catherine Keener, Lauren Ambrose, Catherine O'Hara, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Paul Dano, Michael Berry Jr. Director: Spike Jonze Summary: Max (Max Records) imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off… More
  Cast: Max Records, James Gandolfini, Catherine Keener, Lauren Ambrose, Catherine O'Hara, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Paul Dano, Michael Berry Jr. Director: Spike Jonze Summary: Max (Max Records) imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off land where large talking beasts -- Ira, Carol, Douglas, the Bull, Judith and Alexander -- crown him as their king, play rumpus, build forts and discover secret hideaways. My Thoughts: "The movie is beautifully made and is visually stunning. But the film itself is a bit depressing. Even the 'Wild Things' are depressed. I have to assume this is how it is in the book (I've never read it). I actually enjoyed the creatures. I thought (even though they were depressing) that they were really great, fun characters. Loved Catherine O'Hara as Judith. James Gandolfini was great as Carol. Just great characters. Max Records as Max, was good as well. Although his character, in the beginning, irritated me because of his behavior. But as the story goes you see why he's been acting out, and then you feel sad for him. The story really is quite sad. Made my niece cry which was shocking. That kid don't cry with any movie. But I think any kid who has dealt with divorce and changes in their family will relate to this story. Great job by Spike Jonze."

• Red L

  
  It is amazing how a simple child's book is changed to a complicated movie. The fact that it is a movie about childhood and not a kid's movie makes it more interesting. It would be interesting to have a discussion in a film class about each of the six wild things. Is one… More
  It is amazing how a simple child's book is changed to a complicated movie. The fact that it is a movie about childhood and not a kid's movie makes it more interesting. It would be interesting to have a discussion in a film class about each of the six wild things. Is one Max's mom, one his sister, one his teacher, etc.? I will have to watch the movie again to make up my mind if that could be the case or not.

• Stephen M

  
  I can see why some people say this one is a bit of a downer but I think Spike Jonze actually gets the balance of sweetness and sadness just about perfect here. After all, the book isn't exactly a barrel of laughs either. Intentional or not, the only message I've ever gleaned… More
  I can see why some people say this one is a bit of a downer but I think Spike Jonze actually gets the balance of sweetness and sadness just about perfect here. After all, the book isn't exactly a barrel of laughs either. Intentional or not, the only message I've ever gleaned from Sendak's wonderful story is the mildly subversive reassurance that, no matter how bad he's been, sooner or later even the biggest brat on the planet can still expect to get his supper. I think, therefore, Jonze and his co-writer Dave Eggers deserve credit for introducing a couple of valuable life lessons which any child would benefit from learning at the earliest opportunity: a) that unhappiness is a fact of life and cannot be banished, and b) that being the guy in charge is neither as easy nor as much fun as you think it's going to be. My only serious criticism would be that the personalities of the Wild Things are too much of a muchness, each to a greater or lesser extent a projection of Max's own loneliness and insecurities. Since Max is the sole author of this fantasy, this might make sound psychological sense but, consequently, they never emerge as individuals and are soon forgotten.

• Anthony L

  
  This one seems to have split opinion big time, a real love it or hate it film - although I do feel many have missed the point. I believe it to be a good adaption of the book (which I have read many times) which was always open to interpretation, I mean, a film version of the book as… More
  This one seems to have split opinion big time, a real love it or hate it film - although I do feel many have missed the point. I believe it to be a good adaption of the book (which I have read many times) which was always open to interpretation, I mean, a film version of the book as it is would be either really short or really boring! I think Jonze's style was perfect for the film version, he really understands Sendak's writing but also adds his own ideas to the mix, tapping into the mindset of a wild child and actually a very normal child. When you analyse the book, it's not really that imaginative or 'out there', it's quite simple and that was always it's charm and Jonze understands this. Disney fans need not apply, but branding it depressing and dark is a little lazy, it's very sensitive in exploring what is an amazing time in a persons life but also a very difficult one, again handled brilliantly by Jonze. I have to admit I was very impressed by this, I think it's wonderful, one of those few films that come around once and a while that really inspire. Brilliant!

• Mike S

  
  Dull, uneventful and with a lame excuse for a plot. Because I don't think it counts as a story, when it consists of an obnoxious kid, just playing and jumping around with a bunch of furry fantasy creatures. There's virtually nothing going on beyond that, besides the… More
  Dull, uneventful and with a lame excuse for a plot. Because I don't think it counts as a story, when it consists of an obnoxious kid, just playing and jumping around with a bunch of furry fantasy creatures. There's virtually nothing going on beyond that, besides the characters spending their screen-time on building and destroying stuff. And believe me when I say that it sounds a lot more fun than it is. Everyone's having a blast, except me who is watching it. It wasn't very pleasant on the eyes either. Boring landscapes, colored in various shades of brown, isn't my idea of a nice visual theme. So it goes without saying that this was a disappointment. Not that I expected fantasy gold, but I didn't think it would be this bland and uninteresting. In one word: skippable.

• Thomas J

  
  I guess it has been too many years since my Mom last read the book to me.... I did not connect with my childhood experiences with the book like I wanted to.

• Jay H

  
  A very, very boring political allegory that can't decide if it wants to be serious or childish.

Read all 20 featured audience ratings