Featured Audience Ratings

• Cassandra M

  
  The Wizard of Gore is set in present day Los Angeles where Edmund Bigelow (Kip Pardue) publishes a small underground paper, always looking for the next big thing he decides to go to see a stage magician named Montag the Magnficent (Crispin Glover) after seeing an advertisement. Taking… More
  The Wizard of Gore is set in present day Los Angeles where Edmund Bigelow (Kip Pardue) publishes a small underground paper, always looking for the next big thing he decides to go to see a stage magician named Montag the Magnficent (Crispin Glover) after seeing an advertisement. Taking his girlfriend Maggie (Bijou Phillips) with him they are shocked & thrilled by Montag's performance & show in which he appears to rip the guts out of a stripper named Cayenne (Cricket Suicide) only for her to reappear moments later seemingly unharmed. Soon after Edmund hears a news report in which Cayneene's body has been found horribly mutilated & he makes the connection to Montag's show & start to investigate which results in mind bending hallucinations, drugs, mind control & a sinister plot as his life starts to fall apart as Edmund struggles to know the difference between reality & fantasy... Directed by Jeremy Kasten this is maybe a result of the recent spate of big budget Hollywood remakes of classic horror films such as Halloween (1978) & Friday the 13th (1980) & as such is a very loose remake of the low budget Herschell Gordon Lewis exploitation gore film The Wizard of Gore (1970) & I have to say I really wasn't that impressed with this confusing mess of a film. The original 170 The Wizard of Gore was a moderately effective exploitation film with some strong if fake looking gore & had a fairly simple & daft yet entertaining plot while the 2007 remake has a few flashes of gore which look more realistic but have less impact & are less frequent while the plot has been totally revamped & changed with Montag the Magnificent almost a secondary consideration as the script feels more like Naked Lunch (1991) with it's hallucinogenic & drug fuelled plot that gets very confused & has no big pay-off at the end either & the character of Edmund striking similarities to Peter Weller's character in Naked Lunch both visual & conceptual are not unnoticed. The script tries to set the events up as a mystery & some hallucinogenic drug plays a major role as the boundaries between fantasy & reality become blurred in some elaborate plan which just has the effect of the film going weird as you never really know what's going on & the script does a poor job of explaining itself as little resolved. The more I think about it the more the original The Wizard of Gore seems like a masterpiece compared to this. The 2007 The Wizard of Gore does actually look quite nice although it is set in the seedy sleazy underground world of the Los Angeles night life where everyone seems to have copious amounts of tattoo's, piercings & dress in fetish gear, unlike the 1970 The Wizard of Gore which was set very much in the real world the average person can relate too this one isn't. There's some style here with scenes mostly shot using neon lights although there are some seemingly random moments like the cross hatch grid that keeps flashing into view & distortion of background images for no apparent reason. I was disappointed with the gore here, most of Montag's tricks take place behind a literal smoke screen & little is seen, there's some blood splatter, a decapitation with a bear trap, some guts are pulled out, someone is burnt, someone is impaled on glass shards & rats heads are bitten off. One area where this one differs from the original is that there is lots of female nudity on show if that's your thing. Probably shot on a low budget this looks quite nice with decent production values & effects. The cast features some familiar faces including a barely recognisable Jeffrey Combs, Brad Douriff, the pretty Bijou Phillips with Crispin Glover as Montag in a really camp performance that makes the character just look silly rather than threatening or menacing. The Wizard of Gore is a low budget remake of a low budget film that didn't need or want a remake, in trying to make it substantially different it strays too far from the original's concepts & anyone who liked the original for what it was probably won't like this anywhere near as much.

• David L

  
  Jeremy Kasten's "The Wizard Of Gore" is a remake of the 1970 Herschell Gordon Lewis horror pic where a shady magician's extremely-realistic illusions arouse suspicion from a tv hostess and her boyfriend. In this updated version, the same premise applies, only… More
  Jeremy Kasten's "The Wizard Of Gore" is a remake of the 1970 Herschell Gordon Lewis horror pic where a shady magician's extremely-realistic illusions arouse suspicion from a tv hostess and her boyfriend. In this updated version, the same premise applies, only it's a reporter (Pardue), and his girlfriend (Phillips) who take up an investigation into the twisted illusionist "Montag The Magnificent (Glover). The role reversal in this 2008 straight-to-dvd redo is one of it's main problems. Pardue to me has never been that great of an actor, and I think sticking with the character parts from the original film would've worked alot better. Maybe Phillip's character should've been the lead, everyone knows films like this work better with a female lead. Pardue plays the role of Edmund Bigelow decent enough, but he's a bit too dramatic for the situation at hand, and you never really get the impresison that he has enough backbone or toughness to shut down Montag once he begins to little by little, discover that there's something not quite right with his so called illusions. Phillips actually does better in her role as Maggie, and continues to develop into quite a nice niche actress. Although in this movie she isn't really given much to do beyond be the uber-sensitive artistic type significant other to Pardue's character. She doesn't get any big time scenes really other than a woman in peril scenario which arises near the films climax. But the movie mostly focuses on the building tension and slight rivalry between Edmund and Montag. Glover plays Montag pretty well, although he comes off in the role as more twisted as oposed to dangerous and demented. In H.G. Lewis's version, Montag is alot more dangerous and sinister as he's played by Ray Sager. But in this version, he seems to be more of a showman, who will entertain the crowd at any cost. He does however get a bit darker and more evil as the film progresses, which is supposed to be a nod to him sensing that Edmund is getting closer and closer to discovering his secrets. The basis of the film is that Edmund and Maggie have to figure out whether Edmund's illusions are real or not, and are the volunteers really dead or not. This comes about as Edmund begins having horrifying and violent hallucinations after attending one of Montag's shows with his girlfriend Maggie. As he attends more and more shows, the hallucinations get stronger, more vibrant, and more deadly. This leads Edmund to believe that Montag may be a murderer and as he investigates further, he soon comes to realize that he plays a very big role in what's happening and the possible outcome of it all as well. Either way, if he can't solve the mystery behind what's happening soon enough, he might go completely out of his mind beyond the point of no return. It's really not an extremely gory film, but more of a psychological horror film which is more about implying violence rather than showing it and letting it all hang out at times. It's really one of those horror movies where the plot is successful at making you think, and keeping you guessing. But the characters performances (with the exception of Glover), and personalities fail to keep you that interested in them( with the exception of Flux Suicide, she has alot of screen presence in her small part in the movie). This is a problem because in order to get the audience to follow along with any mystery, you have to create interesting characters who they'll want to see through till the end. This bunch, ain't that. And really most of the time, we're stuck waiting for Glover to return in another classic Montag scene and perform another freaky illusion. The characters are that boring, it's true....but I also have to give mention to Brad Dourif's cameo as a mysterious side character who has connections and ties to Montag does manage to spruce the films intrigue factor up somewhat. But his scenes in the movie are few and far between. The ending of the film is a pretty clever one in some ways, but in other ways it's pretty ridiculous too. Especially because it seems to come out of nowhere and sort of disrupts the story altogether. Still in a pinch, it works just to give the viewer something to ponder for a few moments after the film is over. "The Wizard Of Gore" is another remake that's not as good as it's predecessor, with a few flaws that while are kinda glaring don't sink the movie. It does however provide a decent to average sinister mystery element which could be good for a Saturday night rental. To sum up here, Glover gives a good performance, Brad Dourif spices things up in a cameo, the mystery within the movie is good enough for straight-to-dvd horror fare and did I mention semi naked to naked Suicide girls. Nothing bad to say there. but I do have to stress that in my opinion if Bijou Phillips were the lead instead of Pardue, I felt it might've been a better film overall. The characters were not fleshed out well,and the ending might be a bit on the weird side for some viewers. For me though its a good trash horror movie and worth checking out.

• Phil H

  
  Didnt really follow the story and the way it plans out, very surreal and odd. I didnt really enjoy it to be honest, found it dull and dissapointing.

• A.D. V

  
  I've haven't seen the original (yet) but I somehow doubt it's anywhere as convoluted as this turns out to be. Still, lots of blood and boobs, supporting help from genre faves Jeffery Combs and Brad Dourif and Crispen Glover is wisely underused.

• Christopher B

  
  Another one I may have liked more because I was sick as a filthy fuckin' animal. This is a weird remake of an equally weird film. Though Glover's Montag is fantastic, nothing can ever top Sager's wonderful performance. But why compare when the movies are so… More
  Another one I may have liked more because I was sick as a filthy fuckin' animal. This is a weird remake of an equally weird film. Though Glover's Montag is fantastic, nothing can ever top Sager's wonderful performance. But why compare when the movies are so different? This flick has got Glover, Combs and Dourif, so that's 3 and 1/2 stars just for awesome casting, and the dude (Kip Pardue) who's the lead in this one is just a bizarre mix of Weller's William Burroughs and James LeGross. Fucked up, gory and entertaining, what more do you need?

• ken j

  
  This movie was pretty good i did kinda expect alittle more from the cast and alot of the story is semi incoherent towards the end but the rest of the movie can and will keep you interested, The story centers around a illusionist played nice and weird by Crispin Glover as only he could… More
  This movie was pretty good i did kinda expect alittle more from the cast and alot of the story is semi incoherent towards the end but the rest of the movie can and will keep you interested, The story centers around a illusionist played nice and weird by Crispin Glover as only he could do as he plays in underground clubs selecting women from the audience who he then appears to kill live on stage turns out its only slight of hand but then the girls start ending up dead and the real killer must be found. watch at your own risk cause i cant say this is gonna fit everyones taste also a remake of a Hershell Gordon Lewis Classic

• Juny L

  
  Very interested in seeing this remake of "Herschell Gordon Lewis" splatter film,which could've use a better update.This remake is not an improvement.The story is confusing & not so interesting.Some of the known actors like Brad Dourif & specially Jeffrey… More
  Very interested in seeing this remake of "Herschell Gordon Lewis" splatter film,which could've use a better update.This remake is not an improvement.The story is confusing & not so interesting.Some of the known actors like Brad Dourif & specially Jeffrey Combs,who's playing this recognizable character in disguise are not that interesting.Wasn't so thrill with some of the gory sequences that are partially obscured by stage smoke.Totally disappointed with this new version. <a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/wizard%20of%20gore/Acid_033/wizardofgore_03.jpg?o=5" target="_blank"><img src="http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn195/Acid_033/wizardofgore_03.jpg"></a>

• Patrick D

  
  It's missing the history and edge of the original. Yet it tries to make up for the "edge" of source by creating a sort of underground scene where the characters are part of, which is interesting at best, but also reminds one of the pretentious "scenes" of the… More
  It's missing the history and edge of the original. Yet it tries to make up for the "edge" of source by creating a sort of underground scene where the characters are part of, which is interesting at best, but also reminds one of the pretentious "scenes" of the town where one may live. The director Jeremy Kasten also tries to sharpen the edges with "cool" transitions and optical effects that are a little distracting. The effects would come across better with the right acting and directing instead. What was most upsetting was Crispin Glover, who I love, but who's performance seemed a little phoned in and should have really stolen the show, but didn't, and since he was the main reason I checked out this remake, it was a little disappointing. Brad Dourif was cool though, as so was the Jinkey character, a sort of scuzzy coroner friend of the protagonist. Although there is alot to criticize, I am being hard of the film and really it's rather enjoyable for what it is and holds one's attention throughout out. I enjoyed watching it, even if I was apparently (by the tone of this review) scoffing inside. Plus if only to hear Crispin Glover say "bitch" which is probably the most awkward sounding word coming out of his mouth, you should check this out.

• Marion R

  
  It started off nicely enough then it falls apart at the end. The ending is overcomplicated , it would have been better with a simpler ending. The special effects and blood were done well.

Read all 9 featured audience ratings