Gary Stretch, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Maria Bello

Sept. 11, 2001 was an unusually warm day in New York. Will Jimeno, an officer with the Port Authority Police Department, was tempted to take a personal day to enjoy his hobby of bow hunting, but ultim...( read more  read more... )ately decided that he would go to work. Sergeant John McLoughlin, a respected veteran of the PAPD, had been up for hours--a requirement of his daily, one-and-a-half hour trek to the city. They and their colleagues made their way to midtown Manhattan, just like they did any other day. Only this wasn't any other day. A team of PAPD first responders drove from mid-town Manhattan to the World Trade Center. Five men, including McLoughlin and Jimeno, went into the buildings and were trapped when the towers collapsed. Miraculously, McLoughlin and Jimeno survived, but were buried and pinned beneath slabs of concrete and twisted metal, 20 feet below the rubble field. Though they couldn't see each other, each could hear that the other had survived, and for the next 12 hours, McLoughlin and Jimeno kept each other alive--talking about their families, their lives on the force, their hopes, their disappointments.

Flixster Users

67% liked it

342,048 ratings

Critics

70% liked it

220 critics

PG-13, 2 hrs. 5 min.

Directed by: Oliver Stone

Release Date: August 9, 2006

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: January 29, 2007

Get It:

Stats: 17,651 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (17,651)


  • September 18, 2009
    World Trade Center is way too schmaltzy with loads of mistakes in it too. That quite unforgivable really. Still, its got good acting and is well shot. The DVD extras are quite good too but it?s nothing like Oliver Stone?s usual greatness.
  • July 10, 2009
    The film accomplishes something worthwhile by providing an inspirational message of hope as a testament to the good humanity is capable of, selling it with relatively unslanted truth more powerful than any political opinion could have been. The film is a terrific example of art's...( read more) ability to express and connect to the human soul.
  • April 9, 2009
    A lot could be said about the decision to make a movie about these horrible events of 9/11 so soon, when everyone still has those images in front of their eyes. The problem of the film is not that, though. It's the fact that it reduces the crime of the century to a simple rescue ...( read more)story, that could be told about random fictitious events as well. While the people who worked hard to safe lives that day deserve all the praise they get, it is a thin line to keep it at a decent level below cheesiness. Some dialoges and certain characters of this film, even though based on real ones, are sadly above cheesy. The movie starts promising with images of regular people doing their thing on the morning of that day in New York. It also ends in beautiful images of empty trains, smoke over the city and the "Missing" walls. In between there is very little to keep the audience awake, but a lot of stereotypes and scenes of dirty men in caught darkness. That does not make for a movie worthy of the memory of that day, nor is it worthy of a director the likes of Oliver Stone. The gut-wrenching "United 93" does a much better job in that.
  • April 8, 2009
    Provides the same type of cheap emotions as a roller coaster, of course I cried a lot in front of so much courage and solidarity, of course the abnegation of these men was admirable, but ultimately the film's pretty poor.
    O. Stone did not really think outside the box. Most of th...( read more)e film actually takes place outside the building, away from the trapped men. Each flash back brings its due amount of cheap emotions. Had the all film been set inside the rumbles, it would have been a unique feat, but there, I felt like I was watching a House MD episod.
  • January 29, 2009
    I wasn't as affected by this as I thought I would be. There's one horrible moment when you hear all of the fallen firemen's personal alarms go off after the collapse. (These only start up if the fireman stops moving during a rescue.) Otherwise, it's solid, but I didn't leave with...( read more) a lump in my throat.
  • November 14, 2009
    Pretty well done considering everybodys sensitivity towards 9/11. Well written (based on true events).
  • November 14, 2009
    O.Stone is poking his hoise every subject. What left behind ??????????
  • November 10, 2009
    wow umn just seen this movie 4 the 1st time n think that this is a good movie 2 watch.......its got a good cast of actors/actressess throughout this movie...i think that connor paolo, gary stretch, maggie gyllenhaal, maria bello, nicholas cage, nicky katt, michael pena play good ...( read more)roles/parts thorughout this movie....i think that the director of this drama movie had done a good job of directing this movie because you never know what 2 expect thorughout this movie,,,,,,i think that this is a really powerful movie 2 watch...its a really sad movie 2 watch its a great movie 2 watch with a good cast thorughout this movie....i think that this is a really powerful drama movie 2 watch with a good cast throughout this movie
  • November 9, 2009
    the only thing that makes the movie bearable is the fact that it's about a real and recent event.
  • November 8, 2009
    World Trade Center starts like New York is like any other ordinary day.

    The director Oliver Stone takes us through the daily routines of uniformed officers. As the movie progresses this is panned out to tell the back stories of families, wives and friends. This is America unde...( read more)r attack.

    Actually there is little run up, no explanation of what was about to come, it quickly gets to the gist of the movie which is the officers stuck under the tower. In this respect there is a respectful avoidance of dramatising the shock of the event in detail, and more a familiar tale along the lines of Saving Captain Ryan ? a courageous story about how we saved our men captured by the enemy in this case transit cops stuck under a collapsed building.

    Stone embeds seamless special effects the tons of masonry crashing down, the scarred landscape of the ironwork. Stone fully captures the monumental enormity of the situation.

    The bulk of the movie focuses on two of the cops trapped under the remains of the tower. It is dark and claustrophobic but somehow lacks the fear we expect to see being in a cave or submarine. Instead there is the disruption and uncertainty it causes to families and flashbacks from their family lives. Stone takes us down a soft populist road instead. Stone is guilty here of pushing the usual emotional buttons of Hollywood disaster movie instead of a true gritty look at the horror underneath the wreckage.

    This is a restrained movie without the usual Stone motifs around edgy themes and political tension. It focuses on the working man that defines America. Which could make it Stone?s most optimistic film. The only weirdness appears in quirky Jesus visions.

    This is a mainstream movie that successfully avoids any political buttons in favour of squeezing every tear possible out of you. It is traditional family values coupled with military stamina.
    This is possibly not the defining movie about the World Trade Center. It shies away from the verite style of Flight 93 by Greengrass, anything remotely political and the real horror of being under the collapse of the tower. In that respect it is a family mainstream movie without little to offer on the horror of 9/11.

Critic Reviews


August 11, 2006
Pete Hammond, Maxim

Shines a welcome light on a group of everyday heroes who,
in risking their own lives to save others helped turn America's darkest hour into their finest - and ours. full review

August 9, 2006
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

Stone does everything he can to do justice to the real-life people he's depicting, and yet nothing he does can cover up the film's single but overarching weakness: The personal story he uses to portra... full review

August 9, 2006
Amy Biancolli, Houston Chronicle

It displays optimism, patriotism, emotional frankness and faith. Detractors might call it sentimental. Most of all, it exhibits no political slant whatsoever, injecting only heartfelt empathy for the ... full review

August 8, 2006
Claudia Puig, USA Today

Stone takes one of the most tragic events of this century and focuses on the hope, humanity and determination that also held sway amid the darkness. full review

August 8, 2006
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

Even when Stone is clumsy, he at least seems to recognize that he can't possibly re-create the experience of these policemen: The best he can do is put it onstage, reminding us that this happened to s... full review

August 8, 2006
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

It looks at the tragedy on intimate, personal terms, with a sensitivity and restraint the macho provocateur has rarely revealed before. full review

August 8, 2006
A.O. Scott, The New York Times

Oliver Stone has taken a public tragedy and turned it into something at once genuinely stirring and terribly sad.

August 7, 2006
David Edelstein, New York Magazine

Their film is gripping -- and should be: It has its tentacles around you from its stark title on. It's a title that means so many things to so many people. full review

August 4, 2006
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

The script, by newcomer Andrea Berloff, who worked with both couples to get the details right, has the sting of reality to work against any sugarcoating. full review

View more World Trade Center reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • johnnydepplover15
    October 25, 2008
    i think we should stop making moives on stuff of 9 11 i i only think that because what of the family who lost moms dads and borther sister friends girlfriends boyfriends wifs and husbands? how does it make them feel? watching perveiws on moive like this reading it in newspaper of it coming out. i just dont think its right its still to fresh in people minds. its just not right to think of the pain those people in the trade center with thou even if its a moive or something eles its just not right. im not saying we should forget about what happen. i think we should take a brake from making moives on our war and 9 11 . and instead of making moive on the world trade center what of the hope tower? where are they ? its been 7 years. why arnt we doing any thing about that? all thats thier is a hole why arent the amercain people mad about this? i think no scratch that i BELIVE THAT IF WE MAKE MOIVE ON 911 THEN GIVE THE MONEY TO THE FAMILYS
  • Matt19911
    August 15, 2008
    No one wants to admit it but we just wanted to get the first hand experience on what it would have been like to be in the towers at the time of the attacks etc. This was an opportunity missed but I feel this would appeal to most Americans because they can relate to the firemans feelings etc and we all no how much Americans talk about their feelings and their dedication to their country, which is good really in times like this. But in places like Europe, we can’t get to grips with all the lovey dovey stuff and basically I just wanted to see what it was like. I’m not being fecicious but that is what I expected. I would have also wanted to see what spin they took on who’s fault the towers collasped. I don’t know whether the states are getting this information but all signs are pointing to bombs being planted. I believe the conspiracy theory now, straight after I watched a youtube video of a fireman running out to a street shouting “there’s bombs in the building!”. Also Bush‘s reaction!!!
  • SSxxDD
    April 7, 2008
    OMG!!! R U SERIOUS PPL. COME ON!!! I AGREE WITH THE GIRL WHO COMMENTED BEFORE ME! THEY ONLY DID TWO PPL CAUSE THEY KNOW FIRST HAND. AND THE OTHER FAMILIES MAY HAVE NOT OF AGREED TO BE IN THE MOVIE. AND HOLLYWOOD DIDN'T JUST DO THIS FOR THE MONEY. I CAN'T BELIEVE U'D THINK THAT. IT'S SO PPL CAN ACTUALLY KNOW HOW MUCH COURAGE AND BRAVERY IT TOOK TO ACTUALLY GO IN THERE KNOWING THAT U MIGHT NOT COME BACK OUT. I MEAN, THIS IS FOR THE FAMILIES OUT THERE WHO LOST SOMEONE ON THAT DAY. IT'S SO PPL CAN TRULY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, HOW IT FELT, AND WHO WAS THERE. IF THEY WOULD'VE DONE IT FOR THE MONEY, THEN THEY WOULDN'T HAVE GONE INTO GREAT DETAIL. I MEAN, THIS MOVIE REALLY TELLS HOW AMERICA IS STRONG. HOW WE ALL CAN COME TOGETHER DURING A CRISIS. I SAW IT, I CRIED. I MEAN, FOR EVERYTHING THOSE FAMILIES WERE GOING THROUGH. I THOUGHT IT WAS A GREAT MOVIE, NOT SAYING WHAT HAPPENED WAS GOOD, I'M JUST SAYING, THAT THEY MADE THIS MOVIE THE RIGHT WAY. AND ONE MORE THING, U CAN'T HATE THE ACTORS EITHER.
  • Moviemaiden22
    July 18, 2007
    This movie was well made. I was reading other comments. People asked why the movie only revolved around those two people. Those two people were the only one's who could trully tell you first hand what it felt like to be there when the towers fell. There were only 20 people taken out of the rubble. And no they couldn't say anything about the people who jumped from the towers....that would be too much. and to add how would anyone know what any of the people up there were thinking. thier not alive to tell thier story. These two men were. They made it. and i think thier story was told in a very good light.
  • tambrs
    June 7, 2007
    i haven't seen it and may not ?
  • bluedanz
    April 7, 2007
    It really is a moving movie, it brought so much raw emotions to the surface and in response to the comments about how it would be boring because it revolves around 2 people, that is only 2 of 20 that survived, it says so at the end.
  • tracywalker1
    March 22, 2007
    My mate has lent me this film, havent watched it yet, after reading all of this, not sure if I want to.
  • stefdownunder1
    March 18, 2007
    I think its disgusting that Hollywood have to turn tragedies into money making movies. I think its just awful, what if the parents and families of the actual people who died on that horrible day saw Hollywood only talk about 2 firemen for the duration of the film. How would they feel? Well done Nick Cage, lost total respect.
  • flynno
    February 10, 2007
    about two ppl!!! dats jst stupid lik....wat bou de ppl dat had 2 jump?? wat bou de ppl dat we smashd in2 it??
  • MorpheusOne
    February 3, 2007
    If a movie is good then it is good, regardless of the perception of those who would go beyond casting doubt, but even hatred for a film that they very likely have not seen. Countless ppl have seen this movie & most of them enjoyed it, regardless of the negativity that this movie has received from certain ppl, many of them who don't like Nicolas Cage.

    I haven't seen this movie & I won't rate it until I do. Many ppl rate many movies on here when they don't like the looks of them, but they nonetheless haven't seen them & barely anything irritates me more...

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • The Pursuit of Happyness
    The Pursuit of Happyness (54%)
  • Reign Over Me
    Reign Over Me (59%)
  • Spider-Man 3
    Spider-Man 3 (60%)
  • The Detonator
    The Detonator (43%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

World Trade Cente... : Watch Free on TV


World Trade Center Trivia


  • Who directed World Trade Center?  Answer »
  • This movie's tag line is "The world saw evil that day, two men saw something else"  Answer »
  • In the movie WORLD TRADE CENTER what was the name of Nicolas Cage?  Answer »
  • Which actor has starred in all of the following:- - Raising Arizona - Con Air - Snake Eyes - Windtalkers - World Trade Center   Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin