Zodiac

report broken trailer
< Previous Trailer  |   Add to My Scrapbook  |   Next Trailer >
Zodiac

73% Liked It
liked it

Zodiac

Anthony Edwards, Brian Cox, Chloë Sevigny, Clea DuVall, Dermot Mulroney

As a serial killer terrifies the San Francisco Bay Area and taunts police with his ciphers and letters, investigators in four jurisdictions search for the murderer. The case will become an obsession f...( read more  read more... )or four men as their lives and careers are built and destroyed by the endless trail of clues.

Id: 5201242

Do you want to see this movie?

My Friends Said...

Zodiac Recent Reviews

Register or sign-in to see your friends' reviews !

Recent Reviews

Zodiac Recent Reviews
  • smith44
    December 29, 2009
    smith44
    Zodiac begins on the 4th July 1969 with the Zodiac killers second attack when he shot Darlene Ferrin and Mike Mageau at a lovers lane in Vallejo and ends a decade later, sustaining suspence and occasional horror throughout. From the director of the cult classic Fight Club and the...( read more) medicore Panic Room, David Fitcher hits an nerve and doesn't let go. Form the begining of the of the investigation the audience is riveted to the hunting of the hunter, the real life, still unkown serial killer who called himself 'Zodiac'. And as the investigation runs it course with speculation running wild, the audience becomes evermore obsessed as the investigators are. None more than the character of Jake Gyllenhall, who gives a increasingly frantic performance over shadowed by the sensational witty acting of the masterful but underarted Robert Downey JR. Dotted throughout this masterful crime drama, are scenes of pure horror as the killer feeds what drives him and the investigators get closer to unveiling the Zodiac. (SOPILERS) The fact that the crime is ultimately unsolved adds to the mystery, even though a possible answer to the killers true identity is offered. I wonder if the actor who played behind the mask was the same actor as the possible Zodiac? This would answer the question of wether or not Fitcher believed himself that the proposed cluprit was in his opinion the real Zodiac killer. Questions remain unanswered, but this obsessive compulsive crime drama electricifies.
  • SirPant
    September 29, 2009
    SirPant
    A really enjoyable thriller! Fincher's direction is a joy as he paces the story of the Zodiac investigation with great dignity and detail. Not for people who like their thrillers slap-dash and fast-paced, neither is this for people who are expecting a Se7en sequel. Great style, g...( read more)reat acting, great film, some dodgy blue-screen moments, but still, great film.
  • ohagankieran
    May 3, 2009
    ohagankieran
    How do you turn the serial-killer thriller on its head? Never catch the killer. Fincher's true-life tale is not about grabbing the bad guy; it's about the nature of obsession.
  • DerekA101
    January 19, 2009
    DerekA101
    "I.... I Need to know who he is. I... I need to stand there, I need to look him in the eye and I need to know that it's him."

    Dark, sleek, and mesmerizing Zodiac is a stylish film that accurately chronicles the serial killer who tormented the San Francisco Bay Area...( read more) in the 1970's.

    Director David Fincher (Seven, Fight Club) crafts a different type of masterpiece that he is not accustom to. His previous successes in fiction pales in comparison to his achievement in this narrative. It's extremely difficult to make a film based on actual events and yet maintain its authenticity. One such film that couldn't achieve this level of accuracy was Brian De Palma's inaccurate telling of The Black Dahlia.

    The three leads did a great job, but the one that stands out here is Jake Gyllenhaal as the cartoonist whose life deteriorates as his continued Zodiac obsession intensifies.

    This is one of those films that invoked me to do some research on the Zodiac killer. Prior to this film, I had virtually no knowledge of this case. After viewing many websites, I can see that this film was one of the most accurate portrayals of real life events in recent cinema history. It's an absolute shame that this case still has not been solved despite the mounting evidence against the lone suspect. I hope DNA testing in the future will in fact incriminate him.

    On the down side, this film runs more as an informative History Channel special. I say this only because at a run time of 2hrs. 40mins, it out stays it's welcome. It wasn't entertaining enough to warrant an extended viewing, and the chance of re-watching the film is slim.

    From a filmmakers standpoint, this is an excellent piece of work... and it's highly commendable. But there's an entertainment factor that's missing that prevents me from loving this film.

    "The last time I saw this face was July 4th, 1969. I am very sure that's the man who shot me."
  • JeT0425
    January 10, 2009
    JeT0425
    I know this is becoming quite redundant now, but this is definitely the best film so far this year. The movies I've been seeing just keep getting better and better and Zodiac just wiped out all of the competition. It's by far the best film so far this year.

    I was complet...( read more)ely pissed at the end of this movie for one major reason... you never find out The Zodiac's true identity. After 2 hours and 38 minutes of very deep suspense and mystery, the conclusion doesn't offer an answer. I know there is no logical way for the film to do this since there was no one officially tagged to the Zodiac murders in reality, but in the film world who knows what could be done. Nevertheless, David Fincher tackled this topic with all of the impulse and passion he used in previous achievements like Fight Club and Se7en.

    I consider Fincher to be a master of suspense and one of the greatest auteurs of modern-day cinema. His take on the string of Zodiac murders from the late 60s to the mid 70s is one that is much different than any other already produced, most notably The Zodiac (2005) starring Justin Chambers. The direction of that film lacked intelligence and organization which are the areas that David Fincher's Zodiac excelled in.

    With a story like this, Fincher could have very well made a gore-fest that misused the actors and visuals to merely entertain instead of inform, but luckily for us, Fincher is too good of a director to stoop to that level. James Vanderbilt's amazing screenplay and David Fincher's genius vision work to make the legend of The Zodiac into a strong psychological thriller instead of a gory horror film. The suspense generated in most of these scenes might actually kill you... it's very climactic (especially in the scenes with Gyllenhaal near the end).

    Harris Savides' cinematography is absolutely brilliant and really adds to the overall suspense in most scenes. Within the first few frames I could tell that this cinematography would be something else. Savides worked on films like Birth and Elephant in the past, but has completed his work on the upcoming Ridley Scott crime-drama American Gangster which I am looking forward to seeing already just for Savides' work.

    The musical score was very suitable for the film, also. David Shire (who won an Oscar for his work on 1979's Norma Rae) composed the score for this film and I think that it fits perfectly with the film and highlights many of the thrilling scnenes. The production design was also very effective from the lighting all the way to Zodiac's car; everything worked perfectly.

    The cast was top-notch with strong performances from Mark Ruffalo, Robert Downey Jr. and Jake Gyllenhaal. Downey Jr. was perfectly cast and Mark Ruffalo really impressed me for the first time since You Can Count on Me seven years ago.

    What really highlights this film is the terrific direction from David Fincher. He makes a film and it always comes out near perfect with very few flaws. From Se7en, The Game, Fight Club and Panic Room to this, he proves that he is an intrepid director that will not let us down.
    I'll say it once again, the best film so far this year. I highly recommend this.
  • smootysveen
    January 4, 2010
    smootysveen
    More a study of how the law and the press interact than a murder mystery. The dialogue is often hilarious, and the character's journeys are fascinating. My friends complained that it started out so compelling and then reallly lost steam. But then that's how the actual case was to...( read more)o, wasn't it?
  • natalieseawright
    January 2, 2010
    natalieseawright
    Wow, was it ever long with no real ending.
  • BlackSouls666
    December 24, 2009
    BlackSouls666
    A very good movie. A very long thriller but in this case it dosen't matter.
  • xOxChloeoXo
    December 23, 2009
    xOxChloeoXo
    my bf recommend i watch this due to the fact i <3 films about crime and based on fact just made it that little bit more intriguing. So i went out to asda :) and bought myself a copy definitely worth £5 (unlike other things have wasted that kind of money on before ;) the story com...( read more)bined well together and was easy to keep up with and didn't make me feel dumb or bored half way through. it is a re watchable and recommendable movie all round :))xx
  • roxsytyler
    December 14, 2009
    roxsytyler
    An amazing film! Although I knew how it was going to end I felt I was right there with Jake Gyllenhaal's character in the race to find out who the Zodiac really is. I admire how this is one of the most horriffic stories of all-time and it really happened. It is real-life horror, ...( read more)a real life murder mystery, and it is portrayed superbly in this film.
View All Reviews

Opening This Week

Top Box Office

Upcoming Movies

New on DVD