The Mummy 3: Maria Bello Replaces Rachel Weisz


The Mummy 3: Maria Bello Replaces Rachel Weisz

Posted by CSN91 941 days ago
Maria Bello will replace Rachel Weisz in the third installment of The Mummy 3: Curse of the Dragon after Weisz left because of "script problems". Variety reports that she joins Brendan Fraser, Luke Ford, Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh in the Rob Cohen-directed film for Universal Pictures. Bello will play Evelyn Carnahan O'Connell, the adventuress played in the first two films by Weisz. After Weisz declined to reprise, Cohen and the studio cast a wide net for a replacement. Scripted by "Smallville" creators Miles Millar and Alfred Gough, the film brings the O'Connells and their full-grown son (Ford) to the forbidden tombs of China and the Himalayas, where they battle a shape-shifting mummy, a former Chinese emperor (Li) cursed by a wizard (Yeoh).
97
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • nessalonte
    i did't watch mummy 3 coz of the replacement of character of evelyn. i really admire and think rachel is rachel, no one can replace her role on mummy series.
    posted by nessalonte 414 days ago
  • ladydragon999
    I don't think they should replace Rachel Weisz. She was great in the first and Second and it be good if she in this one too with Brandon Fraser
    posted by ladydragon999 938 days ago
  • pchykunkel
    hey that's cool, I don't care soo much about them replacing weisz, I just don't want them to replace brendan fraser! that would ruin the movie right there!But i'm sure whoever they find to replace weisz, i'm sure i'm going to hate her anyway for being the leading actress in the movie, and kissing my hottie.
    posted by pchykunkel 939 days ago
  • ravengirl2125
    they should not replace her. She's the only one who can play that role. its wrong. she is Evelyn!!
    posted by ravengirl2125 939 days ago
  • nadjan
    It's Unfair to replace her!!!!! After all she did the first two,then why not the third!!!!!
    posted by nadjan 939 days ago
  • AngelusProwl
    You can't replace her! that is so not right!
    Most of the time I agree with this quote, unless the actor/actress really sucked.

    "When a guy named Jon Hein first coined the term “Jump the Shark” he discovered that a bunch of television shows began to “suck” when one of the lead actors was replaced (for instince, Becky from Roseanne). The audiences hate this sort of thing, almost to the point that they feel insulted."
    http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/05/13/maria-bello-cast-as-rachel-weisz-proof-that-the-mummy-has-jumped-the-shark/
    posted by AngelusProwl 939 days ago
  • elenxxx
    I really liked Rachel Weisz,pity she left...at least I hope the movie to be good
    posted by elenxxx 939 days ago
  • drdomino
    The second one was guff anyway so at least its not struggling to keep up any sort of high standard.
    posted by drdomino 939 days ago
  • sashaclarissa
    No woman can replace Weisz...still hoping Weisz 2 played in that movie
    posted by sashaclarissa 939 days ago
  • unbeatablegamer08758
    rchel is hot but not a good actress
    posted by unbeatablegamer08758 939 days ago
  • no one can replace Rachel.....
    posted by hasanrauf 939 days ago
  • It could be as good as the other two. If Brendan Fraser weren't in it too, it wouldnt have a chance. He really is the character that drove the movies, with his action scenes, acting.
    posted by whiteknightc03 939 days ago
  • That sux.
    posted by Clemontine 939 days ago
  • Way Cool. I can't what to see this one I liked both of the other movies and I think this one will be just as much fun. Thanks for the info.
    posted by shermul 939 days ago
  • I'll still watch it. But I won't enjoy it as much without her.
    posted by Jaymes73 940 days ago
  • it's not a good idea to make a movie without weisz. She was the heart of the two others movies. the serie need weisz.
    posted by Mansmovies 940 days ago
  • its not going to be good... not without racheal...
    posted by BeatlesLover24 940 days ago
  • I have a BAD feeling this movie is going to stink. It's not like the TV show Bewitched where they changed Darrens and no one cared. People are going to notice Maria Bello, as good an actress as she is, is NOT Rachel Weisz. Since Weisz won that Oscar she probably feels movies like this are beneath her. Snob.
    posted by MovieGuruDude72 940 days ago
  • estoy quiero urgente ver pelicura ????
    posted by jislena13 940 days ago
  • It will not be the same without Rachel. Her and Brendan make a good team.
    I think they should have probably stopped with 2!
    posted by tinktaylor88 940 days ago
  • who ever did this movie had not one clue, that not that many people will see it...
    i liked the others but i don't think i will like this one
    posted by kekey313 940 days ago
  • OMG i'll be soooo happy if they make a 3ed one i love the first 2 so it will be great
    posted by babygirlm92 940 days ago
  • I do not know about another mummy movie! Some things are just better left alone. Mummification is really an egyptian thing not an Asian Dynasty - Emperor thing. I am sure that the special affects and cinematography will be great but the story line. If they were going do a story about China and the Himalayas they should have focused on ancient Chinese/Asian booby traps and many ghost or spirits from Asian folklore. The story line sounds very iffie.

    Sure Rachel Weisz was not a main character but she worked well with Brendan. Maria looks nothing like Rachel and lacks the accent which I doubt Maria can mimic. Sure I loved Maria in the History of Violence but in this type of fantasy action flick?? I do not know. I will wait to see what the trailer is like but there are some movie that should not have sequels or end at one.

    I think it would have been better to kill off Rachel Weisz's character completely rather than replace her and just have Brendan and his son to the flick.
    posted by zita063072 940 days ago
  • Hmmmm.....and here I thought that she made the movies good.

    Her bumbling in the first one was fun. When she knocked all of those bookcases over, I laughed. Hard.

    She was the Lou to Fraser's Bud. I guess that's why I liked watching the first one so much....it reminded me of Abbott and Costello meet the Mummy.

    When I say reminded me of that, I mean the almost slapstick quality humor.

    It's too bad she didn't want to do this.....the "franchise" won't be the same without her, but I'm willing to give Bello a chance.
    posted by theohiostateguy 940 days ago
  • awwwww no that's not good :(
    posted by LozakaWolfy 940 days ago
  • posted by MasterArcherRachel
    "Weisz was not any good in the movies, sure she played a some what important role in the movie but if they replace her it won't be any different. Brendan Fraser is the star of the movie, now if they changed him yeah i would be against it. You should be supporting Fraser, he doesn't get as many roles as he should.

    What will it change by replacing Rachel Weisz?!.......Nothing she played no important part in the movie.

    AND it says she left she didn't get let go or anything, she left for script problems so... it's her fault."

    What will it change?? Everything! Her chemistry and on-screen presence really made the movie work between her character and Brendan Fraser's. She may have left because of "script problems", but why is that her fault? It doesn't say what the problem was - maybe script called for her going topless - or something she wouldn't do. That's not her fault. She obviously felt it wasn't right. And, I think the movie will suffer for it.
    posted by smooth81 940 days ago
  • thats not cool
    posted by juggalos 940 days ago
  • AND it says she left she didn't get let go or anything, she left for script problems so... it's her fault.
    posted by GodOfFlixterIsMyBitch 940 days ago
  • Rachel Weisz was not any good in the movies, sure she played a some what important role in the movie but if they replace her it won't be any different. Brendan Fraser is the star of the movie, now if they changed him yeah i would be against it. You should be supporting Fraser, he doesn't get as many roles as he should.

    What will it change by replacing Rachel Weisz?!.......Nothing she played no important part in the movie.
    posted by GodOfFlixterIsMyBitch 940 days ago
  • Thank goodness, thought they'd never get varound to making another film. Canna wait, pity Rachel has opted out, I'm sure Brendan and Jet Li will make it worthwhile though.
    posted by wolfielonesomepine 940 days ago
  • wont be as good if weisz has been replaced!
    posted by pugac2020 940 days ago
  • I have enjoyed the mummy saga thus far.
    hopefully it doesn't fall with the replacement.
    Can't wait to watch.
    posted by dmprattca 940 days ago
  • Ugh, I can't stand Maria Bello... not like I cared about this movie in the first place.
    posted by mnovak1 940 days ago
  • Jet Li isn't retired. What had happen is that he finished making kung fu (Fearless) type movies. He's still going to do movies, especially action flixs with plenty of martial arts ("Worldlords" and the "Forbidden Kingdom").
    posted by AquaPhoenix 940 days ago
  • posted by jonerick
    "jet li didn't retire...he's making a film with jackie chan, or going to anyway. supposedly he's not doing any martial arts anymore tho, that doesn't mean he won't fight, just that he won't do what he did in Hero or Fearless. W/O Rachel, this movie's gonna suck..."

    I originally read your reply and thought you were crazy. But, the more I read, the more it looks as though he's going to still be doing movies, just not martial arts. Which, will be wierd. But, yeah, without the original cast, I can't believe this movie will feel the same. I guess we'll have to wait and see. But, I'm not going to hold my breath...
    posted by smooth81 940 days ago
  • jet li didn't retire...he's making a film with jackie chan, or going to anyway. supposedly he's not doing any martial arts anymore tho, that doesn't mean he won't fight, just that he won't do what he did in Hero or Fearless. W/O Rachel, this movie's gonna suck...
    posted by jonerick 940 days ago
  • For those of you who don't know, Jet Li has OFFICIALLY retired from acting. He is NOT doing another movie. So, I doubt this story is true. However, if it somehow holds some truth, getting rid of an original main actor/actress ALWAYS ruins the movie. For those of you saying Rachel was not a major character, what do you mean? She was pivotal in both Mummy movies. The chemistry between her and Brendan is key. You get rid of her, and that whole familiarity and chemistry is gone. I'll maybe rent the movie...but, it probably won't be worth it.
    posted by smooth81 940 days ago
  • Yay, I will not give up on the Mummy. Even though the second one really....sucked. The first one was awesome! And this one has Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh. Heck yes!
    posted by DarthBetty 940 days ago
  • replacing an actor is the worse idea ever. i hate movies that change their actors. however i can't wait to see the movie.
    posted by taytay502 940 days ago
  • An interesting side note however is that THE DARK KNIGHT will probably be better without Mrs. Cruise... I'm just saying, it really is no loss.
    posted by matthewupton 940 days ago
  • i agree...a character change is fatal blow to the head...and w/o da head da whole thing collapses...
    posted by enrique34024 940 days ago
  • I say if any actor can't come back to a movie they should just dump the whole ridiculous thing!!! They've done this with too many movies and they've always been horrible because they've cast another actor to play the part when that person doesn't even look like the actor! THANK THE LORD that all the actors in Pirates 2 are staying around for the 3rd movie. At least THAT movie's going to be good.
    posted by songbee 940 days ago
  • MasterArcher, if any characters get changed in any movie it always ruins the movie cuz then its never like the original...Eve should stay the same actress through all the movies or they shouldnt make a third otherwise its gonna be crap
    posted by shelteredskittle 941 days ago
  • Foofighters91 Rock on dog! This will be one to remember, Brendan needs more roles though. He does so well in these Mummy movies. Who wouldn't want Frasers talent in more movies.
    posted by GodOfFlixterIsMyBitch 941 days ago
  • Ladyofeveilness you can change the ones that don't change the movie, Brendan Fraser is the Star of the movie. His wife in the movie was no important actor I don't know why you think changing her will change the movie.
    posted by GodOfFlixterIsMyBitch 941 days ago
  • it will kill the movie, u cant change actors it just comes out crappy
    posted by ladyofevilness 941 days ago
  • they already fuck up the movie
    posted by DR1Style 941 days ago
  • arnold wont come back psshhhh hes died 3 times already lets leave him dead:P
    posted by gabefarrington 941 days ago
  • I want watch that....
    posted by burgerkinggirl2002 941 days ago
  • i want to see the movie its very cool movie
    posted by foxn25 941 days ago
  • I'm not sure that it will be the same without Rachel Weisz. I hope Arnold Vosloo comes back as the mummy. I'm sure it i will be a good film (i Hope)
    posted by blondemafiagirl 941 days ago
  • that movie was cool
    posted by sakruto 941 days ago