"Cloverfield" Sequel Confirmed

"Cloverfield" Sequel Confirmed

Posted by SexiVixxEN 689 days ago
Full Story: http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=7405&...
Variety has confirmed that Matt Reeves is in early talks with Paramount to direct a "Cloverfield" sequel, and he has also made a deal with GreeneStreet Films to direct "The Invisible Woman."

Timing of the projects will depend on how quickly Paramount can complete discussions with Reeves, producer JJ Abrams and scribe Drew Goddard to scare up another monster tale for the "Cloverfield" sequel. There's a good chance the sequel will be Reeves' next film, in which case he will direct "The Invisible Woman" afterward.

"Woman" is a Hitchcock-style thriller that probes the mind of a former beauty queen who turns to a life of crime to protect her family. Reeves wrote the script and will produce with Abrams. "Matt has created a truly original and compelling character and story," said GreeneStreet's John Penotti.

With a $25 million budget, a strong concept and cast of unknowns, "Cloverfield" scored a $46 million opening, which was a record for a Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend. Paramount gave away almost no first-dollar gross, making the film a bargain for the studio.

Related: Cloverfield
report bad content
67
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No
Get Movie Widget
Movies & Actors at Flixster

Comments

Post a Comment
  • roydonm0526
    just what we need a second to a crap movie
    posted by roydonm0526 667 days ago
  • Pigfaced
    all they gotta do with the sequel is a compilation of news reports(maybe there was live tv crew nonstop, hank azaira just happends to be the cameraman) many different home movies found on various places in NY.
    a sort of governmental rundown of what happened:
    posted by Pigfaced 669 days ago
  • AndyLovesRedskins
    yea, i also hope that we get more monster info, apparently its been in the ocean for thousands of years and it was awakened by a stalite, this was a great movie, but it was a bit scant on monster backstory, but we did know a lot about the characters.
    posted by AndyLovesRedskins 682 days ago
  • ajcercenia
    hmm maybe the sequel will feature information about the monster, which was ignored in the first one. What do you think?
    posted by ajcercenia 687 days ago
  • MannBra
    Exactly I completely agree with u LeMortDeKorn
    posted by MannBra 688 days ago
  • jhnjstnjys
    yes! hopefully more info on the monster will be given in the next film.
    posted by jhnjstnjys 688 days ago
  • koRnLolLipOp
    Well i certainly hope that the sequel is just as good as the 1st.

    I personally loved it, and i didn't get sick w/ the camera movement.

    The movie, def. lived up to the hype in my book.

    posted by koRnLolLipOp 688 days ago
  • comicgeek13
    So what is the sequel gonna be right after the first one or is it gonna be from a different group of people.
    posted by comicgeek13 689 days ago
  • jim222001us
    They need to start it off where the other ended and maybe try it without the Blair Witch Project formula.
    posted by jim222001us 689 days ago
  • maritzaaponte
    pretty good. People claimed it would make you sick and stuff, but I came out of the movie just fine. I liked it. Thumbs up!
    posted by maritzaaponte 689 days ago
  • love the first one. can't wait for this one.
    posted by Kakaroto24 689 days ago
  • I hope the sequel doesn't turn into another Blair Witch 2.
    posted by TheMechanic1 689 days ago
  • Confirmed? Wow. Here in the UK we havnt seen Cloverfield yet.
    posted by chrismid259 689 days ago
Post a Comment