Donnie Darko Sequel Coming -- Unfortunately


Donnie Darko Sequel Coming -- Unfortunately

Posted by SexiVixxEN 594 days ago
It sounds like a prank. We would all like it to be one. But it seems to be legit.

The story comes from Screen Daily, who reports that S. Darko is being shopped around, with Fox already picking up the North American distribution rights. Touted as the sequel to the 2001 cult hit, the story picks up seven years after Donnie Darko left off. The youngest Darko, Samantha, is now 18 and abandoning her commitment to Sparkle Motion. She heads to Las Vegas with her best friend Corey, but the two are plagued with bizarre visions. I imagine they will involve a rabbit.

Richard Kelly, the original director, is in no way involved. Chris Fincher will direct instead. Daviegh Chase, who played Samantha in the original, will reprise her role. It looks like she is the only one. The movie also stars Ed Westwick, Briana Evigan, and Justin Chatwin.

As to the big looming question of why, oh God, why, Simon Crowe of UK sales company Velvet Octopus says they're thinking of the children. "I think there is a new generation of cinema-goers who will be very excited to see this film."
Which generation came of age between 2001 and 2008? Why haven't they rented Donnie Darko? I am afraid these are questions to which Crowe has no answers. But he did quip, "Donnie's not in [the new film] but there are meteorites and rabbits."

Nothing is safe from the all mighty dollar, my friends. Nothing. Even when there is a pretty conclusive ending, there can always be a sequel. I'll leave you to think about that as I go pen my script for No Country for Old Men 2.
25
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • merriman123
    With an awesome movie like this it doesnt need a Sequel!
    Movie makers did the same with many movies !
    Uhh now im depressed :(
    posted by merriman123 310 days ago
  • fizzycakes
    So are they trying to teach these new cinema goes to be idiots and have bad opinions? I mean, of course, Donnie Darko is excellent if people cared enough they would rent that. There's no need for this. No to take this out of context, but it's like making a sequel to a classic just so more people will be aware of the less superior version.
    posted by fizzycakes 406 days ago
  • thalie13
    WTF!!! I'm so sick of sequels
    Donnie Darko does not need one!!!!
    posted by thalie13 593 days ago
  • theohiostateguy
    Writing as a fan of time travel stories, a second one couldn't be any worse than the first one.

    What started out as a solid premise, was ruined by counter-contradictions, and a secondary story that had nothing to do with the other.

    Not to mention mediocre acting from mediocre actors.

    If that's what they're shooting for as a sequel, then as I said, it wouldn't be any worse.
    posted by theohiostateguy 594 days ago
  • FilmsExpert
    I bet it will be the same story as with the American Psycho sequel, and yeah if you seen both remember what happened? Exactly the same thing going to happen with Donnie Darko. A shame really, ruin a perfect movie with a perphaps dissapointed sequel.
    posted by FilmsExpert 594 days ago