Discuss: 'The Dark Knight' Snubs and Gets Snubbed


Discuss: 'The Dark Knight' Snubs and Gets Snubbed

Posted by SexiVixxEN 386 days ago
This morning we learned that the Hollywood Foreign Press doesn't like The Batman very much, as they only awarded the film one gimme nod to Heath Ledger in the Best Supporting Actor category -- this despite the fact that the film has broken records at the box office and is about to smash some more on DVD. According to reports, The Dark Knight has sold 600,000 Blu-ray copies on its first day on the market, destroying the previous record held by Iron Man (260,000 Blu-ray discs). Additionally, the Bat-tastic flick sold three million DVDs on Tuesday, and will most likely catch up to Iron Man's one-week total of 7.2 million sold.

Okay, so obviously people are falling over one another to have at this piece of badass -- but when it's all said and done, what did you think of the disc(s). As previously mentioned in our review of the Blu-ray disc, I felt the special features were seriously lacking -- not only in the commentary department, but also in the character department. Personally, I wanted to see a special feature on Ledger's Joker, as well as Eckhart's Two Face. I wanted to hear more from the cast, I wanted them to extend their ridiculous viral marketing campaign to the DVD and send us on a wild goose chase. I felt like this was a blatant set up for a double dip, with Warners most likely releasing an Ultimate Deluxe Edition during the next holiday season, and that kinda frustrates me.

So, did The Dark Knight deserve more nominations? What did you think of the Blu-ray disc or DVD? And were you satisfied with the special features, or did this year's biggest home video release let you down?
12
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • virtue64
    it deserved was more nominations. And i got the dvd version of the movie and i did not like the special features... i agree with writer of the article in that there needed to be more with the cast and their characters... i was also hoping for a really good heath ledger tribute
    posted by virtue64 385 days ago
  • stevewyllie1
    the dark knight deserves more votes...maybe its time that these awards were voted by the true critics...the cinema-goers!!!

    as for the comment from someone about how bad the film was....if you don't like comic book films don't watch them!!

    when compared alongside Titanic...other than money and watched across the globe because the titanic was an event that happened so let's be honest everyone knew the outcome and ending.as for the dark knight it was new and the actors were well selected!!

    i think secretly people are trying to oust the DARK KNIGHT as let's be honest it's a BRITISH based film and britain can't be seen to be stealing and conquering one of the U.S.'s most prestigious events!!!(and let's be honest some of hollywood's finest stars at present are from britain and australia!!!!).
    posted by stevewyllie1 385 days ago
  • undeadfeature
    article told me to discuss, so that's what I'm doing. TDK wasn't much better than Titanic.
    posted by undeadfeature 385 days ago
  • TheCreativityMaster
    Can you be quiet undeadfeature!!!!!!!!!! And I agree with Matt.
    posted by TheCreativityMaster 385 days ago
  • Matt19911
    Thats the end for the oscars!

    Now we know for sure that the people agreeing on the nominations and winners are just the arty types. The Titnaic, biggest grossing film of all time, but was completly awful, 11 wins.

    Lord of the rings: return of the king was ok but nothing special, 11 wins.

    The Dark Knight, the one film that the critics and the audiences agreed on was fantastic, and 1 nomination.

    BIN THE OSCARS!!!!!!!!!!!
    posted by Matt19911 386 days ago
  • undeadfeature
    I'm glad the critics know better than to get caught up in the hype of a film, especially one as bad as The Dark Knight. Some acutal quality films are getting the nominations they deserve. TDK was nominated in the only category it deserved.
    posted by undeadfeature 386 days ago