Discuss: Movies That Are Better Than the Books


Discuss: Movies That Are Better Than the Books

Posted by SexiVixxEN 353 days ago
When a studio in Hollywood snatches up your favorite book, I think you die a little inside. How many fantastic novels have been rewritten, gutted, misrepresented, and utterly destroyed in their big screen adaptations? Too many to count, right? You could probably devote a film blog to documenting them all. But every once and awhile, a movie comes along that is actually better than the book. It's rare, but it does happen. As we have a fair number of film and book fans browsing our fair site, I'd like to know which adaptations you think make this elusive category.

I'll give you two of my own to start -- and I'll probably cause a flame war just for my opinions on T.H. White. I'm a medievalist at heart, and a junkie for the fantasy genre, who eagerly picked up a copy of The Once and Future King one summer as a break from studying Old and Middle English. I thought it was a crime I hadn't read it, since I do own multiple copies of the Morte d'Arthur and promised my professor I would read Sir Gawain and the Green Knight in the North Midlands dialect someday.

I expected to be blown away, to sneer at Disney's milquetoast adaptation, and put it there alongside my umpteen copies of Chaucer. Instead, I could barely get past the cat boiling, the threats against Questing Beasts and hedgehogs, and the blatant misogyny. (Guinevere is a basket case because she can't have kids!) Disney's The Sword and the Stone may not be my favorite film, it may not even rank among the greats of animation, but it's better than The Once and Future King -- if only because it lacks cat torture and misogyny. (It does, however, lack Robin Hood, which is the highest point of White's novel for me.)



My other pick would have to be Doctor Zhivago. This is one of my favorite films, and I dutifully read the book. It's a good book (like the film, it's far more about the Stalin era than it is about the 1917 Revolution), it's poetic, and it's romantic. Some of the most cinematic parts are even left out of David Lean's classic. But Lean, at least, understood that the story's heart was the war-ravaged romance between Yuri and Lara. It's their relationship that symbolizes the life, love, and beauty that the regime is suppressing. I know Boris Pasternak knew it too, and yet betrayed his own characters with an unforgivable ending. If you cherish your memories of Yuri and Lara, never read it. For years, I was convinced that something was lost in the translation, and that there was something deeply Russian I was missing ... only to have my native Russian professor suddenly blurt out the same thing in history class one day.

So, if your a White or Pasternak devotee, you can argue the point now -- but I would much rather hear some of your own suggestions. Debate away in the comments ... and be brave about stating your picks!
9
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • alemagico
    Oh, I forgot. Earthsea is an amazing book, and the film for TV was awesome, but I think I will give it a draw. Chronicles of Narnia...I love better the books, but I will give it a draw also XD ERAGON...I love more the book, cause the movie is messed up, but is better than that vampire flick. Books are books, movies are movies. In books you got all the details, in films, they edit the bad, the good, and the awesome. If a film was as good as a book, it needs to be exacly as the book...if not, they just tried.

    PD: So many great books and so many great movies.
    If comic counts...Christopher Nolan's Batman is awesome, but I will give the comics more credit, cause without them, this movies would not be made. Oh, and thanks to the TV series, this actors can give more of them to the characters. Thanks to Cesar, we got a Ledger'Joker. So, thats cool.

    THE JOKERDISE CRANE
    WHY SO SERIOUS?
    posted by alemagico 353 days ago
  • ragingbull1990
    The Godfather I would say. The books may not the best written, but the movies are the best ever made, except for the third. Definetely The Shawshank Redemption is better than the short story.
    posted by ragingbull1990 353 days ago
  • alemagico
    Defenetly Lord of the Rings is better than the book. Harry Potter is in a draw with the books, even if fans dont agree, cause its my fact, and thats the reason IM IN LOVE OF IT! (duh, is for the REAL ACTORS thing). The Tale of Despereaux is better than the book...but I would give it a draw also.

    PD: If its the movies that are worst as the book, I would defenetly go and pick Twilight. That movie is nothing compared to the book...and yes, the REAL ACTORS thing...is needed, cause those actors where the worst I even seen.

    ATT
    THE JOKERDISE CRANE
    WHY SO SERIOUS?
    posted by alemagico 353 days ago