Watchmen Reviews are Mixed


Watchmen Reviews are Mixed

Posted by SexiVixxEN 304 days ago
Watchmen will no doubt rule the box office this weekend, but are the Watchmen reviews any good? Check out some of the Watchmen reviews, which are a mixed bag, and let us know - will you be lining up to see it this weekend?

Metacritic.com gives Watchmen a score of 57 out of 100, based on reviews from 38 critics. Some Watchmen review highlights:

Kyle Smith, New York Post - Score 100: “Director Zack Snyder’s cerebral, scintillating follow-up to “300″ seems, to even a weary filmgoer’s eye, as fresh and magnificent in sound and vision as “2001″ must have seemed in 1968, yet in its eagerness to argue with itself, it resembles “A Clockwork Orange.”"

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times - Score 100: “It’s a compelling visceral film — sound, images and characters combined into a decidedly odd visual experience that evokes the feel of a graphic novel. It seems charged from within by its power as a fable; we sense it’s not interested in a plot so much as with the dilemma of functioning in a world losing hope.”

Richard Corliss, Time - Score 80: “Watchmen has moments of greatness. It proves again that the action movie is where the best young Hollywood brains have gone to bring flesh to their fantasies.”

Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly - Score 67: “Even Watchmen fanatics may be doomed to a disappointment that results from trying to stay THIS faithful to a comic book.”

Devin Gordon, Newsweek - Score 40: “Speaking as an admirer, but not an apostle, of the graphic novel, I thought the Watchmen movie was confusing, maddeningly inconsistent and fighting a long, losing battle to establish an identity of its own.”
35
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • courtknightrembrant
    The character Doctor Manhattan (the blue guy as you refer to) dose not wear clothes for most of the film because he believes that now he is no longer human, why does he have to comform to society's rules? We as humans have believed for longest time that covering up ones self is an act of modesty. If you walk around naked its wrong and gets you into trouble. So because he is no longer human, he dose not have to follow societys rules and makes clothing optional. You also have to understand that the movie follows the graphic novel as close as possible and dose its best in the amount of time they have to make this movie work. I HIGHLY recomend reading to graphic novel. In the book only New York city was destroyed. By changing it and involing other cities around the world, it makes it a world wide issue and gives the rest of the world a stake in wanting to make the change. This movie in many ways mirrors life and where we as a planet is headed. I loved it and plan on seeing it a second time
    posted by courtknightrembrant 302 days ago
  • TheCreativityMaster
    I actually had a great concept of the movie before I saw it (I scan through the graphic novel and read first few pages). So this was a fantastic movie! Speechless. I don't know where to start grading this movie more like it. Top 5 superhero films is for sure though.
    posted by TheCreativityMaster 303 days ago
  • RemiLogan
    I liked it, but I can understand people not "getting it." We as a country still view comic books and comic book heroes a certain way; plus most of us haven't read the graphic novel.

    Low points: heroes having two names, viewers on the outside looking in, and horrible soundtrack (with the exception of the Jimi Hendrix song and My Chemical Romance cover)

    High points: visually stunning (even without the help of IMAX), cool if not super-violent fight scenes, and Rorschach kicked ASS!!
    posted by RemiLogan 304 days ago
  • lionluvr1966
    saw the movie last night. why clothe everyone but the blue guy? too distracting I started making jokes. the long haired girl sucks as an actress and loved scenes were pointless. the only person worth watching was the short masked guy with the hat. He was in the original "Bad News Bears" movie. It was ok, but way too long for what it was! Predictable
    posted by lionluvr1966 304 days ago