'Transformers': Worst-reviewed $400 million hit? (...


'Transformers': Worst-reviewed $400 million hit? (AP)

Posted by SexiVixxEN 178 days ago
LOS ANGELES - After just five days, "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is halfway to $400 million domestically, a box-office milestone only eight other movies have reached. If it climbs that high, the "Transformers" sequel will be by far the worst-reviewed movie ever to make the $400 million club.

Critics and mainstream crowds often disagree, but "Revenge of the Fallen" sets a new standard for the gulf between what reviewers and mass audiences like.

The movie pulled in $201.2 million since opening Wednesday, the second-best result for a movie in its first five days, just behind "The Dark Knight" with $203.8 million. Even after its whopping $60.6 million opening day, "Revenge of the Fallen" was packing theaters, a sign that unlike critics, who mostly hated the movie, audiences felt they were getting their money's worth and were giving the flick good word of mouth.

Critics "forget what the goal of the movie was. The goal of the movie is to entertain and have fun," said Rob Moore, vice chairman of Paramount, which is distributing "Transformers" for DreamWorks. "What the audience tells us is, `We couldn't be more entertained and having more fun.' They kind of roll their eyes at the critics and say, `You have no idea what you're talking about.'"

According to Paramount's exit polls, 91 percent of the audience thought the sequel was as good as or better than the first "Transformers," which received far better reviews.

Most of Hollywood's all-time biggest hits are accompanied by either good or at least passable reviews, and some can be among the year's most-acclaimed, such as this year's "Up" and "Star Trek" and last year's "The Dark Knight," "WALL-E" and "Iron Man."

Not so for the new "Transformers." On Rottentomatoes.com , a Web site that compiles critics' opinions, the sequel had only 38 positive reviews out of 187, a lowly 20 percent rating usually reserved for box-office duds.

Many critics who liked the movie had reservations, praising the movie's visual effects and relentless action but generally advising audiences to check their brains at the door.

The critical drubbing was a new low for "Transformers" director Michael Bay, never a favorite among professional movie reviewers. But he has long been a favorite among fans, scoring hits with the first "Transformers" and such flicks as "Armageddon," "Pearl Harbor," "Bad Boys II" and "The Rock."

Like blockbuster maestro Jerry Bruckheimer, who produced many of Bay's movies, the director aims to please audiences, not critics.

"He really had blinders on when it comes to what he believed the picture needs to be, and then he executed it," said Brad Grey, Paramount chairman and chief executive officer. "He's a director who is the definition of blockbuster at this point. His grosses speak for themselves."

Bay's previous worst score on Rottentomatoes was 23 percent for "Bad Boys II," followed by 25 percent for "Pearl Harbor." Even his commercial flop "The Island" rated well above the "Transformers" sequel, with 40 percent positive reviews.

Of the eight movies that have grossed more than $400 million domestically, four scored 90 percent or higher on Rottentomatoes: "The Dark Knight," "Spider-Man," "E.T. the Extra-terrestrial" and "Star Wars." Two others, "Shrek 2" and "Titanic," topped 80 percent.

The other two had mixed reviews but still came in far higher than "Revenge of the Fallen," with "Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace" scoring 63 percent and "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" rating 53 percent.

This year's biggest hits so far had terrific scores, "Up" with 97 percent and "Star Trek" with 95 percent. Both movies have grossed about $250 million, a number the "Transformers" sequel will soar past by next weekend.

On Metacritic.com, a site that assigns ratings of zero to 100 based on movie reviews, "Revenge of the Fallen" received a 36, a lowly score barely above those given to recent box-office duds "Year One" and "Land of the Lost."

Bay has said that if there is a third "Transformers" movie, he would like to come back for it. But his next project could be far quieter than the explosions and action for which he is known.

"I've got to take a little time off from the robot world," Bay said before the movie opened. "I've got to do something totally different. It's enough of this for right now. I keep saying I'm going to do my small movie. I've got one I want to do."
29
 
Interesting Story?
Yes No

Comments


  • elly8483
    who cares about critism!! as long as people enjoy to watch the movie it's enough for michael bay.. as for me..i've already watch ROTF twice..if i had a chance... mybe for the 3rd time i go and watch this movie..damn excellent!!! really awesome!!
    posted by elly8483 171 days ago
  • Ghanjaspawn
    Sorry, but the most dissapointing movie of the year goes to Wolverine. What more can you expect from a movie like Transformers 2? Alot of robots fighting, explosions, and alot of over the top action. What did critics expect? A brainy sci-fi thriller?!?!

    I haven't liked a single movie Micheal Bay directed, except the Transformers movies.

    It just goes to show you critics have just about as much good taste in movies as the average joe.
    posted by Ghanjaspawn 173 days ago
  • TheMechanic1
    Before I saw ROTF, I'd seen all of Michael Bay's movies and I heard the talk from his critics, but aside from Armageddon and Pearl Harbor, I didn't think he was that bad. Bad Boys 2 was his worst movie, yet, it was a guilty pleasure, for me. Transformers, for whatever it's worth, I thought it was his best movie. But had I known that he took whatever worked with TF1 and worsened it to the lowest form imaginable, I would have never paid a penny to see ROTF. It made me "see the light", as to why he is poison to filmmaking.
    posted by TheMechanic1 173 days ago
  • xXxHarleyxQuinnxXx
    accually its IS A CRAPPY MOVIE! if everyone would get over the OOH AND AHHS of the special effects...itsf just not a good story line at all and the acting is crap as well!
    posted by xXxHarleyxQuinnxXx 174 days ago
  • movieaddict15
    i don't believe this..the movie was spectacular!!mind blowing action, great casting and excellent story..and one good thing is if you love to travel around the world, definitely u will love'd this!!after all, michael bay is well known director for making blockbuster and spectacular movies!!critics are critics..as long as the people enjoyed, amazed and entertained, who cares about the critics?????????nah...........
    posted by movieaddict15 174 days ago
  • sanjurosamurai
    you people are all crazy. this was a horrific movie. when critics and audiences agree on "up" and "star trek" then people are proud of that, when critics disagree then they dont know anything. you people dont seem to have any self awareness. to say a critic doesnt know anything is like telling a plumber he doesnt know about toilets. he didnt make the toilet, but he knows more about them then the rest of us. same with critics, they know far more about films than any of you.

    the story in this movie was so riddled with holes i could drive the devestator through them. it was a poorly made film, period.
    posted by sanjurosamurai 175 days ago
  • Clemontine
    Its weird, cuz some critics admit its great action, but check your brain at the door. But I dont get that. I actually thought the story was excellent, as well as the action.
    posted by Clemontine 177 days ago
  • lee1701
    Critics are living in the past. Not very many people care for movies of substance (you know the ones that either make you fall asleep or the ones that keep you on the edge of your seat, wondering what's going to happen next). Most of us just want to be entertained, amazed, and taken away from our normal lives. That's why we watch movies.
    posted by lee1701 177 days ago
  • duanerucker2009
    this movies was off the chain SHOOT forget what the critics said
    posted by duanerucker2009 177 days ago
  • richfrndmkr10
    man... critics... who listens to them... its all about the fans yo!
    posted by richfrndmkr10 177 days ago
  • to hell with the critics, this movie rocked
    posted by majidbala 177 days ago
  • interesting, yet absolutely sad. last year, we'd finally maken some great headway - almost all of the biggest moneymakers of the year (Dark Knight, Iron Man, WALL-E), were ADORED by critics and audiences alike. i thought we'd be seeing a blockbuster revolution - now, i'm betting all the studios will go back to "who cares what the critics think? fuck writing a good script, let's just make shit go KABOOM!"
    but yeah...i've never seen such a critic/audience gap. it sure tells you something about society and the film community, although i'm not quite sure what. i'll reserve all my judgement until i see the film...who knows, maybe the critics really are just plain wrong this time. could happen, right?
    ....right?
    cheers
    KZ
    posted by gilbertgumphrey 177 days ago