I liked its predecessor more. This one seemed a little all over the… MoreI liked its predecessor more. This one seemed a little all over the place and not so focused on the story, but on the 3D crappy effects. The story development is predictable and a bit disappointing. Kate Winslet did that marvelous villain thing. Woodley's character cut off her hair, really the only development in her character. Theo James's character is all, look at me I'm a badass but not really. Octavia Spencer what are you even doing here? Waste of talent in this movie. Naomi Watts, why? This one was so badly cast, you can't convince anyone of your character. And that's it, if there really is another movie, I surely hope it will be a lot better.
Doesn't come close to excellent films like "The Prince of Egypt", it's… MoreDoesn't come close to excellent films like "The Prince of Egypt", it's really far behind. This movie is boring to say the least, Sigourney Weaver why did they even cast you for this movie? You appear for like what 3 minutes? Still you're in the main credits, like what? Bale, was boring as hell, Kingsley was kinda lost there, the best actor it this is Joel Edgerton which is saying a lot since he is not part of the "stars". God, I had so many expectations for this one.....crash and burn, crash and burn.
Not great, not entirely bad, a bit cliché, great to see Jodie Foster… MoreNot great, not entirely bad, a bit cliché, great to see Jodie Foster but Matt Damon what are you doing? Not a movie for him, at all.