| Movie | Rating | Review | Date | Your Rating | Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminator Salvation - PG-13 |
''We've been fighting a long time. We are out numbered by machines. Working around the clock,without quit. Humans have a strength that cannot be measured. This is John Connor. If you are listening to this,you are the resistance.'' After Skynet has destroyed much of humanity in a nuclear holocaust, a group of survivors led by John Connor struggles to keep the machines from finishing the job. Christian Bale: John Connor Terminator Salvation blasts off the summer with it's action packed, sci-fi war time apocalypse theme and this time it doesn't even need Arnie magic to be a metallic mesmerizing piece of blockbusting glory. Yes we have Christian Bale hitting another franchise as the main prophet leader John Conner, looking slightly reminiscent of his Machinist days. But we can forgive that, this is the future, this is a world at war...at war with machines. From the word go Terminator Salvation does not stick to the same formula the other Terminator films followed, not at first at any rate. The twist being that we have not just humanities salvation in question but also the salvation of one man, or if you wish, one machine. The soul being equal to either in opinion. Terminator Salvation takes two roads and gives us a dazzling array of characters in which to relate to. Whether it be Bale's wooden, angry, seriously brooding John Conner, or Sam Worthington as tough good guy terminator Marcus Wright, or boyish rogue Anton Yelchin as Kyle Reese whom strikes gold with another performance as with Star Trek for a rising star, he's got more films ahead of him I'm sure of it. Helena Bonham Carter was an interesting appearance, although a computer sequence in which she explains the whole point of the machines purpose kind of made me cringe with unemphatic predictability. Moon Bloodgood has a good romance with Sam Worthington which is believable, unlike Bryce Dallas Howard and Bale who fail to be considered a couple in love, the kiss they share is almost as wooden as Bale appears to act sometimes. Granted it may not be there entire fault but I fear a tension between the two during filming perhaps. Common does a similar role of what he did in Wanted but shows he can do this type of action movie. ''You and me, we've been at war since before either of us even existed. You tried killing my mother, Sarah Connor. You killed my father, Kyle Reese. You will not kill me!'' So Terminator Salvation isn't overly original, it borrows some sequences from Transformers, for instance a tentacled machine tied to a table, mirrors a certain scene in the former. It may not have alot of new ideas, but what it lacks in originality it makes up for with great sequences, some great effects, despite a few plot holes and looping, this is a great effort to carry on the Terminator legacy. An animated appearance of Arnie may shock, and definitely to me seemed surreal, Bale being thrown around by a 10ft Schwarzenegger seemed to defy belief. Overall Terminator Salvation is another blockbuster to start the summer, and definitely and adrenaline rush from the word go. It may not be a rival for the new Transformers popularity but it definitely has alot of spirit and ideas to a franchise that has been around for just as long. When you reach the end, you know it's not really the end...Terminator Salvation is just the beginning...again...and you know they have to make more terminator films to keep the money coming in. This is Alex Curran, leader of the resistance, signing off...(John Conner is having a heart transplant, so standing in for the poor chap). ''Win or lose, this war ends tonight!'' |
June 9, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Star Trek - PG-13 |
''Your father was captain of a starship for twelve minutes. He saved 800 lives, including yours. I dare you to do better. Enlist in Starfleet.'' A chronicle of the early days of James T. Kirk and his fellow USS Enterprise crew members. Chris Pine: James T. Kirk To put it simply Star Trek isn't just a reboot of a dying franchise, Star Trek isn't just a summer blockbuster, Star Trek isn't just sci-fi effect laden fun, Star Trek is an adventure, experience and humourous coming together of characters and creatures. This gives Star Wars a run for it's money and ultimately taps into something new the originals and new sequels lacked, spontaneity. It's not just fresh visuals and new characters the music is new also giving the whole film a fresh, reborn, vibrant feel. J.J Abrams has successfully tapped into his vein of originality, poise and vision with stunning effectiveness. LOST, Mission Impossible 3, the writing behind Cloverfield and now Star Trek show us how imaginative a director Abrams is, and that we can expect more to come from this man. ''Live long, and Prosper.'' Characters are relatable and likeable to audiences. Whether it be rebellious Kirk, Intellectual Spock and their fiery relationship and clashing of personas, wonderfully played by Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, who strike the nail on the head perfectly. Eric Bana plays villainous Nero effortlessly, Bruce Greenwood excels as Capt. Christopher Pike, Karl Urban is likeable as the quirky witty Dr. Leonard 'Bones' McCoy, Zoe Saldana is the beautiful Nyota Uhura, Simon Pegg is the comical Scotty, John Chothe sword trained Hikaru Sulu, Anton Yelchin the Russian Pavel Chekov, Ben Cross as Sarek and Winona Ryder as Amanda Grayson Spock's Mother. The film has been compared to Iron Man in more than one review the similarities are clear. Both films feature excellent dialogue and character interactions, swift, clever characterization, a minimum of laborious exposition, and also have a common flaw: a rushed plot which overall is almost a side plot. The only reboot to truly escape this pitfall thus far is Casino Royale, which successfully told a very tight story and also consistently developed Bond as a character. Bana is menacing enough and his ship is well-designed but overall he's no Khan or Chang and was much better-written in the Countdown prequel comic than in the film itself. There are also a series of massive contrivances to get everything where it needs to be which will have viewers rolling their eyes, but even these are handled well by the script, which is smooth and fast as opposed to clunky and sterile. Plus, they're necessary for this origin story not to be a typical boring origin story and become what it is. It's a new directive, yet totally faithful to Trek where it needs to be: in spirit and inspiration. In a world of dreary blockbusters and 'dark' reboots, this Trek, though grittier in terms of design than anything before, shines, from opening to closing, as an example of optimistic, exciting, thrilling, humorous, and thoroughly enjoyable adventure action packed sci-fi cinema. ''Space... the final frontier.'' |
May 12, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Monsters vs. Aliens - PG | April 2, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| The Damned United - R |
''GOOD LAD!'' A look at Brian Clough's 44-day reign as the coach of Leeds United. Michael Sheen: Brian Clough The film effort The Damned United is a delightful inside glimpse at a period in time, focusing on a certain manager, a manager called Brian Clough. Director Tom Hooper incorporates live footage from televised news reels of the time with real time actors and happenings on set. The Damned United is going back to the day, living yesterday and being in awe of the good old days, the days when drinking and smoking before a football match were excepted, the dirty tactics of Leeds United and their brawling babaric methods with opponents, can be over-looked. This is a day when drinking tea on your lap was the norm, and football just wasn't simply about money, it was about pride and real competition. Michael Sheen's Brian Clough is an entertaining, arrogant but likable character with self-destructive flaws. Obviously he has the best lines (unfortunately many of which feature in the trailer) and some of his best scenes are with Timothy Spall's Peter Taylor, whom finds their friendship severely damaged at various points as the events transpire. Clough's vulnerability and insecurities are explored in his relationship with Taylor and the audience learn that only as a team do they conquer English football. Clough's apparent hatred for Revie stems from being snubbed by the latter at an early Cup match. This experience drives Clough's ambition to not only succeed, but to attempt to eclipse the architect of Leeds United's Golden Age. Along the way we learn about the now familiar friction between the Manager and the Chairman, the task of signing players and the universal theme of pride coming before a fall. Brian Clough: No, I'm going to fight him. As with legendary picture Frost/Nixon the story caters for people with very minimalistic knowledge of the subject matter and as such, it can be enjoyed by football fans, history fans and film fans alike. Plus there isn't a huge amount of actual ball kicking by the cast, so people won't switch off. There is an obligatory montage, but it's nicely done and over quickly. Overall, The Damned United provides historical entertainment, laughs galore and fun beyond most fantasy and blockbuster films dream of achieving. This is one of those Michael Sheen triumphs you want to be there for, especially at the end when we even see the end results for the characters in the aftermath of Clough's 44 day management of Leeds. This for me was a wonderful climax, a beautiful conclusion and an absolute pleasure to experience. Plus the fact I say again, that my friend whom is a football/film fan, plus me whom loves history and film, plus acting and brilliantly portrayed characters, this is a golden movie to watch and for a universal audience. The Damned United is a perfect adaptation and tribute to a man who wasn't afraid of burning ambition, perhaps showing off a tad too much but in doing so he did some amazing things. His friendship with Peter Taylor is beautifully captured here, Spall and Sheen shine, Damned United shines. ''If you want to be loved, you're going to have to change.'' |
March 27, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Duplicity - PG-13 |
''You on one side, me on the other. It's perfect.'' A pair of corporate spies who share a steamy past hook up to pull off the ultimate con job on their respective bosses. Clive Owen: Ray Koval Duplicity comes from Director Tony Gilroy and is also written by him. The beginning starts of in a typical way, that entices said viewer into watching, with it's pair, in the guise of Clive and Julia, plus the two bosses fighting in a surreal, over the top, and heightened way, at a meeting. Performances and character wise, Julia Roberts as Claire Stenwick, is the crafty female lead whom teams up with Owen, and boy do they make a lovably effective duo. Getting past the fact Julia has the weirdest lips to look at,she does indeed look dazzling and uses witty dialogue and effective lines. The trouble being this isn't really a role different from any other role she has previously done albeit it's one where she has abit of fun admittedly. The other aspects that shine in Duplicity is the wonderful music,the locations and the witty dialogue. Roberts and Owen have shared the screen before in Closer (2004) which was rather more adult, so I heard, yet still need to have the pleasure of viewing. There's a chemistry between the pair which, while not coming close to previous pairings, it is still fun and playful to watch. And this is where the show comes into its own. It's a flimsy, watchable affair that's fun for the most part. Duplicity is predictable, stylish and fun yet for it's flaws it still shines thanks to the killer lines and comedy that ensues. ''You're gaming me!'' |
March 25, 2009 | N/A | |||
| The Bourne Ultimatum - PG-13 |
''Do you even know why you're supposed to kill me? Look at us. Look at what they make you give.'' Bourne is once again brought out of hiding, this time inadvertently by London-based reporter Simon Ross who is trying to unveil Operation Blackbriar--an upgrade to Project Treadstone--in a series of newspaper columns. Bourne sets up a meeting with Ross and realizes instantly they're being scanned. Information from the reporter stirs a new set of memories, and Bourne must finally, ultimately, uncover his dark past whilst dodging The Company's best efforts in trying to eradicate him. Matt Damon: Jason Bourne From the word go its non-stop action, one of the best action films of modern times in existence. The clever aspects about the third installment is that it's wonderfully directed and executed by Paul Greengrass, it outdoes its predecessors in terms of pace and edgy cinematography, plus the facts that this scenario, this modern story of a Government secret experiment training program, could be real, individuals tapping into our phones, or being targeted and eliminated at any point, any number of cameras or face recognition techniques to clamp us down or capture us become frighteningly realistic. Bourne Ultimatum features some of the best chases ever committed to celluloid. The chases in this are truly mesmerizing and the sound/beats, accompanying music, plus shakey camera work adds to the tension and teeth grinding element of the heightened mood. ''Issue a standing kill order on Jason Bourne, effective immediately.'' Human, emotion,empathy, compassion, the question and unwavering answer of the mirrored, rising hero in touch with his humanity or a robot programmed follow-order cold assassin. The latter being a lonely road. No links, friends or family. End of the day do the right thing. The Bourne Ultimatum is another addition to the series based on a novel by Robert Ludlum. It's positive message and detailed fast paced scenes will have you captivated in its almost two hour running time. Once again, Matt Damon is back again and seems more at ease than he was in the other two movies still wondering how or who put him in the predicament that he's in now. This time Bourne is in London and a reporter (Paddy Considine) informs him of an organization called Blackbrier, a more menacing organization than Treadstone that's run by an evil CIA agent, who wants Bourne dead. Also in pursuit of Bourne is a girl named Pam Lundy (Joan Allen) who has faith, that Bourne is not a threat that the CIA assumes he is. And the city-hopping is off in full swing up to his final destination in New York where he fights off his ex-handlers. Though not a thinking-movie like the slower paced The Bourne Supremacy, this movie depends more on action and non-stop chases, for all action fans. And anyone who gets in Bourne's face, will likely get pummeled. Bourne has Blackbeier's henchman after him who seem to expose similar traits as him. But Bourne is more well-versed than them, so that gives him still the upper edge. Very tense scenes on the rooftops of Tangiers to the traffic-laden streets of the Big Apple, the chase reign supreme. As a conclusion The Bourne Ultimatum obliterates James Bond into a trash can and pummels the living daylights out of it, while remaining the action film of the decade! ''I remember. I remember everything. I'm no longer Jason Bourne.'' |
March 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Golden Door - PG-13 |
''We have to arrive in America looking like princes!'' The story is set at the beginning of the 20th century in Sicily. Charlotte Gainsbourg: Lucy Reed The Golden Door is a telling and rendition of a Sicilian family's journey from the Italy to America. Salvatore, a middle-aged man who hopes for a more fruitful life, persuades his family to leave their homeland behind in Sicily, take the arduous journey across the raging seas, and inhabit a land whose rivers supposedly flow with milk. In short, they believe that by risking everything for the New World their dreams of prosperity will be answered. The imagery of the New World is optimistic, clever and highly imaginative. Silver coins rain from heaven upon Salvatore as he anticipates how prosperous he'll be in America, carrots and onions twice the size of human beings are shown being harvested to suggest wealth and health, and rivers of milk are dove in and flow through the minds of those who anticipate what America will bring. All of this imagery is surrealistically interwoven with the characters and helps nicely compliment the gritty realism that the story unfolds to the audience. The contrast between this imagery versus the dark reality of the Sicilian people helps provide hope while they're aboard the ship to the New World. The voyage to the New World is shot almost in complete darkness, especially when the seas tempests roar and nearly kill the people within. The dark reality I referred to is the Old World and the journey itself to the New World. The Old World is depicted as somewhat destitute and primitive. This is shown as Salvatore scrambles together to sell what few possessions he has left (donkeys, goats and rabbits) in order to obtain the appropriate clothing he needs to enter the New World. I thought it was rather interesting that these people believed they had to conform to a certain dress code in order to be accepted in the New World; it was almost suggesting that people had to fit a particular stereotype or mold in order to be recognized as morally fit. The most powerful image in the film was when the ship is leaving their homeland and setting sail for the New World. This shot shows an overhead view of a crowd of people who slowly seem to separate from one another, depicting the separation between the Old and New Worlds. This shot also suggested that the people were being torn away from all that was once familiar, wanted to divorce from their previous dark living conditions and were desirous to enter a world that held more promise. As later contrasted to how the New World visually looks, the Old World seems dark and bleak as compared to the bright yet foggy New World. I thought it was particularly interesting that the Statue of Liberty is never shown through the fog at Ellis Island, but is remained hidden. I think this was an intentional directing choice that seemed to negate the purpose of what the Statue of Liberty stands for: "Give me your poor, your tired, your hungry" seemed like a joke in regards to what these people had to go through when arriving at the New World. Once they arrived in the Americas, they had to go through rather humiliating tests (i.e. delousing, mathematics, puzzles, etc.) in order to prove themselves as fit for the New World. These tests completely changed the perspectives of the Sicilian people. In particular, Salvatore's mother had the most difficult time subjecting herself to the rules and laws of the New World, feeling more violated than treated with respect. Where their dreams once provided hope and optimism for what the New World would provide, the reality of what the New World required was disparaging and rude. Salvatore doesn't change much other than his attitude towards what he felt the New World would be like versus what the New World actually was seemed disappointing to him. This attitude was shared by mostly everyone who voyaged with him. Their character arcs deal more with a cherished dream being greatly upset and a dark reality that had to be accepted. The film seems to make a strong commentary on preparing oneself to enter a heavenly and civilized society. Cleanliness, marriage and intelligence are prerequisites. Adhering to these rules is to prevent disease, immoral behavior and stupidity from dominating. Perhaps this is a commentary on how America has learned from the failings of other nations and so was purposefully established to secure that these plagues did not infest and destruct. Though the rules seemed rigid, they were there to protect and help the people flourish. |
March 17, 2009 | N/A | |||
| The International - R |
''Sometimes you find your destiny on the road you took to avoid it.'' An Interpol agent attempts to expose a high-profile financial institution's role in an international arms dealing ring. Clive Owen: Louis Salinger The plot deals with an agent (Owen) attempting to uncover and possibly prove a bank's involvement in sudden killings as well as arms dealing. The premise itself is good and sufficient enough to be carried through the film's nearly 2 hour runtime. This combined with a mostly solid story give the film an almost Tom Clancy-esquire style. Unfortunately, what keeps the story from being full realized from its potential is how it, along with most of the film seems to drag on to the point of yawns aplenty. Due to the relative slow pacing it can almost become hard to realize there's actually an interesting plot unfolding. The events of the plot are placed on the shoulders of various characters, with Clive Owen and Naomi Watts carrying the weight of this task. While Watts, as with most of the supporting cast, seems to have on and off performance deliveries Owen really manages to shine as the lead. Most of the film's best lines of dialogue come from Owen and his conversations with other characters, especially Watts. Sadly, these line deliveries aren't too frequent and, as a result (as with the plot), it can become hard to realize the subtlety of some of the dialogue. Protocol, procedure and jurisdiction always get in the way of justice. No one can handle the truth because of the immense responsibilities; stepping out of the boundaries of the law is crucial to success, and no real solutions can ever change the overwhelming corruption that seizes each aspect of every government. This isn't a new premise for Hollywood, and The International isn't relying on huge twists or extreme creativity to separate it from the commonplace action films opening on a regular basis. Audiences aren't likely to get the resolution or confirmation they're looking for by the end of this confused thriller, but as far as anyone should be concerned, the inconclusive toxin results, edited police statements, cover-ups and assassinations are no match for Clive Owen's powerful stare. It's all he ever brings to a gun-toting engagement, and it usually suffices. All told, The International is a film that shows so many signs of greatness but only occasionally successfully administrates them. If you're interested in the film's plot and how it unfolds you might find a solid watch with The International, but be ready for a rather slow story. This is far from a bad film, yet the well-executed scenes are too few and far between to make it worthy of an honest recommendation. For Tom Tykwer, this a far cry from Perfume and even a brief cameo by Ben Whishaw absently, subtly reminds of this fact, maybe next time Tom... Jonas Skarssen: What do you want?Louis Salinger: I want some fucking justice. |
March 17, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Disney's Aladdin - G | March 10, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| The Young Victoria - PG | March 8, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| Gran Torino - R |
''Yea? I blow a hole in your face and then I go in the house... and I sleep like a baby. You can count on that. We used to stack fucks like you five feet high in Korea... use you for sandbags.'' Disgruntled Korean War vet Walt Kowalski sets out to reform his neighbor, a young Hmong teenager, who tried to steal Kowalski's prized possession: his 1972 Gran Torino. Clint Eastwood: Walt Kowalski Gran Torino comes from someone who has considered some of his highly praised directorial works as over appreciated, I was absolutely in awe and pleasantly surprised with Gran Torino, a exquisite film and compelling story to boot. I disagree greatly with the suggestion that Eastwood is merely channeling his classic tough guy routine here in Gran Torino - I see and get far more out of his performance. There are many different facets to this Walt character, there is a lot from his past that he is living with and a lot in the present that he is working through. I think Eastwood brings out the conflicted nature of his character very well in a subtle way. Yeah, Eastwood is one tough dude in the film, but he works in his classic tough-guy persona while being very funny, layered, and giving a heartfelt effort. It is easily the best performance I have ever seen him give. ''Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have fucked with? That's me.'' Screenplay was probably written with Eastwood in mind (I am not sure of the behind-the-scenes details on this) and it shows. He captures Kowalski perfectly. The film is surprisingly humorous, something that isn't being captured well enough in advertising. It's absolutely hilarious at times (watch as Kowalski attempts to make a man out of Thao by teaching him how to talk like men do), and Eastwood handles the shifts in tone brilliantly. When the film takes a dark turn towards the end I sat on the edge of my seat in suspense, fully aware of where it was heading but still mesmerized by Eastwood's tour-de-force direction. This is an artist at his prime as an actor and as a director. Overall, a Korean war veteran who has killed and has seen killing. His hate for Asians, presumably due to the war, is subdued after acts of kindness by his neighbors and the boy he befriends. Kowalski's parish priest is persistent in attempting to subdue the hate that boils within Kowalski. In the end the priest gets through to Kowalski, learning something from Walt as well. Kowalski repents in the end and offers up the supreme sacrifice for his Asian neighbors. A heart-warming story that leads one on an emotional journey of self discovery. ''The thing that haunts a guy is the stuff he wasn't ordered to do.'' |
March 6, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Be Kind Rewind - PG-13 | March 4, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| The Prestige - PG-13 |
![]() ''Never show anyone. They'll beg you and they'll flatter you for the secret, but as soon as you give it up... you'll be nothing to them. The secret impresses no one. The trick you use it for is everything.'' Having been firm friends, a friendship turns into a deadly rivalry. When Alfred performs the ultimate magic trick, Robert tries desperately to find out the secret to the trick and to use it for his own means. Obsession turns the two men and begins to unravel their lives.... Hugh Jackman: Robert Angier Christian Bale: Alfred Borden The Prestige is based on the book by Christopher Priest. The story is about two entertaining magicians who become rivals, ever since a terrible occurrence transpires, a friendship that turns to rivalry, a rivalry that turns deadly. Friendly rivalry becomes an obsession. Their obsessions over trying to discover how the other does the trick, or how to upstage said trick, could turn into a life threatening game. Firstly this came first, and does not reveal all twists right at the end, like cop out wannabe The Illusionist. Nolan's previous work (Memento, Insomnia, Following.) has built upon his manipulation of audience engagement with film texts, and tweaking our sophisticated knowledge as viewers in such a way that our work as an audience helps propel the film as we are forced to guess, then second guess our preconceived notions of where his films are headed. Without recognizing our intelligence as an audience, the film would have no place to go. The psychology of Nolan's films are like that of a masterful storyteller, akin to Robertson Davies' Fifth Business set of novels. The make up and structure of the medium, whether it is writing or film-making, or magic tricks, is key to the enjoyment of the medium's content. We are well aware as we watch The Prestige, how the film unfolds in three acts, exactly as the magic pieces are described in the film. It is both a pleasure to behold on a story level, as well as a film level. Technically, it is parlaying exactly what it is being mystically told as the plot develops. This movie is a classic example why film schools exist. ''Every great magic trick consists of three parts or acts. The first part is called "The Pledge". Besides all of the various twists, the acting and casting are phenomenal. Christopher Nolan's Prestige achieves in getting across a tale of dueling magicians, resulting in high quality entertainment and drenched with darkness, true to Nolan's style. Prestige isn't a battle of words, but one where actions speak volume. The film is full of mirroring and doubling, so it's not surprising that the magicians' feud mirrored by Nikola Tesla's equally dangerous rivalry with Thomas Edison over the electricity that may or may not be the key to the mystery...if there even is one at the core... ''The second act is called "The Turn". The magician takes the ordinary something and makes it do something extraordinary.'' Magic is the perfect equation for both stories and film-making, in the way the film could almost be an allegory about why movie buffs usually make the worst movies. Each protagonist is an incomplete man in every sense of the word. Bale has the genius but not the ability to sell his illusions to an audience. Jackman has the showmanship but not the originality to create a truly great trick. In the middle is Michael Caine's engine, the backstage genius with the surprisingly shaky cockney accent, caught somewhere between director and ghost writer in the scheme of things. ''Because making something disappear isn't enough; you have to bring it back. That's why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part, the part we call "The Prestige".'' Ultimately, it's a film that could be about everything or about absolutely nothing, one that is either led entirely by plot differentiating or one where the themes and storytelling dictate the characters' actions far more than credibility, and where the biggest trick is that ultimately there is no trick. All interpretations seem equally valid, which is part of the fun and puzzlement. And best of all, it's a joy to behold. ''Now you're looking for the secret. But you won't find it because of course, you're not really looking. You don't really want to work it out. You want to be fooled.'' |
March 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Downfall (Der Untergang) - R |
''If the war is lost, then it is of no concern to me if the people perish in it I still would not shed a single tear for them; because they did not deserve any better.'' - Adolf Hitler- Historical, controversial and powerful insight.The last ten days of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime are seen through the eyes of a young woman in his employ in this historical drama from Germany. Bruno Ganz plays Adolf Hitler who shows us a man who is plummeting into madness and despair. For Hitler was a man with a vision of world domination and racial superiority. Any mistakes would instantly send him into a violent outburst, and Ganz plays this beautifully. His mannerisms, his deluded ideas and he grasps at false hopes. ''The war is lost... But if you think that I'll leave Berlin for that, you are sadly mistaken. I'd prefer to put a bullet in my head.'' Granted Downfall is a long film which could of been edited slightly, but makes up for with great fashions of the times, set pieces and a reasonable score. Also this is history being told honestly and in a truthful non-glorifying manner,yet in an also non-demeaning way either too. Having studied in History classes, the 2nd World War and Adolf Hitler, I find it fascinating and disturbing all at the same time. A whole nation dragged to its knees by a ruthless tyrannical uncaring remorseful selfish man, who unfortunately is human not some mythical monster. He shows empathy for people, shows a love and affection for his partner and his loyal dog, yet in other parts shows us an angry, rage filled monster, full of hate and power drunk consequences. Humanity's inhumanity to man. Good to see Germany's view-point, and an honest telling from Directing team Duke White, Garrett White, Oliver Hirschbiegel. ''Many mistakes have been made. Be ruthless. Life doesn't forgive weakness. This so-called humanity is religious drivel. Compassion is an eternal sin. To feel compassion for the weak is a betrayal of nature. The strong can only triumph if the weak are exterminated. Being loyal to this law, I've never had compassion. I've always been ruthless when faced with internal opposition from other races. That's the only way to deal with it.'' The film is also based on the memoirs of Traudl Junge (Alexandra Maria Lara), who was Hitler's appointed secretary. The plot also uses Inside Hitler's Bunker by Joachim Fest in order to keep the plot as historically accurate as possible. Hitler is obviously always the main focus of the movie, and even when he is not on camera his shadow on the events that happen on screen is always present. Minor grave endeavors are shown throughout the movie and director Oliver Hirschbiegel does a good job of connecting them to the main problem: the Nazi Party. These happenings range from instances of violence on the streets, to suicides. The most intriguing part of the film is not the realistic reproduction of a bombed city, or the amazing acting by all involved, although these things are startling and deserve awards. No, the best part is definitely the way Hitler is illustrated. During his last ten days, he didn't have control over anything, not the country, not the army, and not even the Nazi party itself. While the movie depicts those things really well, it goes even deeper and acknowledges that the Fuhrer couldn't even control himself. It was something not even he realized until those final moments in that dark bunker, where he shot himself. The movie looks great thanks to the cinematography of Rainer Klausmann, with battle scenes and aftermaths coloured in strikingly cheerless tones. Credit also has to go to director Hirschbiegel for the choices he made as far as what to film and where in the movie to put it. It is also to his credit, the way he directs the actors. Bruno Ganz practically embodies Hitler, portraying both his flaws, and positive traits. All the actors around him, while turning in great performances are simply puppets for him to interact with, remarkably mirroring the roles their characters played in Hitler's real life. So in this film you get not only an enormously accurate picture of World War II itself, but also an accurate portrait of the life of the most important and flawed man in arguably all of human history. Downfall is an endlessly rewarding motion picture and one of the best of the year. So if you don't mind the German language and having to read subtitles, you will be able to acknowledge the importance of Oliver Hirschbiegel's Downfall. ''You must be on stage when the curtain falls.'' |
February 24, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story - R |
''It's called Karate, man. Only two kinds of people know it, The Chinese and The King. And one of them is me.'' Singer Dewey Cox overcomes adversity to become a musical legend. John C. Reilly: Dewey Cox What a surprisingly funny and entertaining movie. This movie is one of the best spoofs on media stars to come out in a long time. Not only was John C. Reilly wonderful in his role as Dewey Cox, the entire cast was great. Special commendation must be afforded to Raymond J. Barry who plays Dewey's rambunctious father. Mr. Barry was truly hilarious. Now there a lot of nudity in this movie, but it's part of the story and without it the story of Dewey Cox could not be effectively told. If you like a clever script, strong comedic acting, and a movie that is a great parody of the entertainment industry and undoubtedly draws its material from the actual depraved behavior of some of the most well-known and internationally famous entertainment stars, then this movie is for you. Remember, though, the humour is adult and it's not for kids. There are so many things wrong with Dewey the character. At times he can be downright nasty; most of the time he is thoughtless and self-centered. Nevertheless, the creators of this movie have succeeded in developing a character who, despite his myriad of shortcomings, is likable, and, unlike the mentally challenged and emotionally stilted Forrest Gump, is a creditable metaphor for the human condition - and for a Hollywood movie, that's impressive. The actual material itself is fairly hysterical. There are plenty of laughs to be found at any given turn here, and many laugh out loud moments to go with them. Just watching these actors delivering their lines in purely serious ways, especially during the some of the film's most ridiculous moments (ironically, moments that fall very close to those found in Line or Ray), is just too much to not be able to laugh at. All of these actors seem very at home with the material, and look like they are having a lot of fun with their characters. This also seems to be one of the closest followed scripts of the past few Apatow films, and rarely does it appear that the characters are improvising (or they have just really improved from their consistent ad-libbing). The sets, backgrounds and costume designs, evoking the specific periods, are just as funny, if not more. There is a grand sense of authenticity at work here, and anyone watching the movie can pick out specific ties to their own memories (real or imagined) of those eras. Of course, there are a few too many nods to current fashion trends, but it stays very keenly in the area of that specific era depicted during that point in the film. Reilly as Cox is a marvel in the lead role. He brings his more refined dramatic style to the role, and I think it helps lend a certain aura of credibility to the performance. He really makes this character his own, and when he is not being downright hilarious, without even breaking a grin, he is being heartbreakingly hysterical. It is a mixed bag, but Reilly makes it work, and he makes it work very well. His performance as the actor is only topped by his performance as the singer. He leads songs brilliantly at every point in the film, and even though the subtext of most of them is a bit risqué, they are still wonderfully written songs sung by someone with a great voice. If this role does not spring board Reilly into more leading actor work, it just may give him the needed boost to be a singer (or at least, to do more musicals or head to Broadway). The supporting cast, although not nearly as funny as Reilly, all lend a hand in making Walk Hard a very funny movie. From Kristen Wiig and Jenna Fischer as Cox's wives, to Tim Meadows, Chris Parnell, and Matt Besser as his band mates, to Raymond J. Barry as his father, everyone manages to steal a scene for themselves, and manages to deliver some solid laughs. Yes, there are quite a few flat jokes that are given by the supporters much more often than Reilly as the lead, but for the most part, they do a great job backing him up. It also helps that it seems like everyone has some sort of minuscule amount of chemistry with Reilly, allowing their jokes to fly very easily. Despite its faults, Walk Hard is a solid addition to the growing canon of Apatow comedies, and is one hell of a funny parody. Reilly was the best man for this role, and I am happy to say that he makes the film more than just watchable. |
February 23, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (AVP 2) - R |
''What the fuck are you?'' Warring alien and predator races descend on a small town, where unsuspecting residents must band together for any chance of survival. Steven Pasquale: Dallas Howard Gunnison County, Colorado faces an incredible crisis of galactic proportions..A Predator-alien hybrid, Pred-lien, has birthed on a Predator ship, causes the space vessel to crash-land in a forest region on Earth near the Colorado town posing a thread to humankind. We watch as the Predalien spreads eggs into the human populace while the face-huggers, which escapes the crashed Predator ship, attach to human faces. The birthing process, unlike in previous Alien films, is much faster it seems and they soon grow into the monsters that go on a murderous rampage leaving bodies piled up. Soon the National Guard moves in only to be eliminated in quick fashion, leaving a motley group of surviving citizens to fend for their very lives as menacing baddies are at every turn. A Predator warrior, who finds his fallen comrades, silently vows vengeance, and any human in this path will die. Glossy dumb cartoon action-horror flick is a fun way to waste 100 minutes. Characters are given just enough exposition to establish them before they face the trials of being in between a war of a Predator warrior and slimy alien walkers. Yes, a lot of the film takes place at night and within darkened places(such as a sewer during which alien face huggers attach themselves to derelicts' faces and Predalien attacks a female hobo who finds her buddies under unfortunate conditions, while we also see the Predator warrior setting up hi-tech booby-traps and blasting them before exploding through the city street above)so the action can be hard to place which is a shame. I didn't have a problem others, it seems, have with the CGI used in the film. CGI granted is obvious in areas. The filmmakers found clever ways to use Predator warrior's night vision to display the violent wake of their victims' dead bodies. There was also an amusing scene where a citizen's head is taken clean off by the Predator warrior's helmet laser. And, the Predator warrior uses a large , hi-tech forms of daggers which, when thrown, slice off alien heads(..one even sticks a human to the wall). The Predalien is a funny hybrid which can actually lay eggs down the throats of victims(..as is the case when the things fills the body of a pregnant woman in a hospital). It has the face of a Predator, yet has the alien walker's whipping tail. As in any of the previous films that came before this, there are human casualties, in the wrong place at the wrong time, such as a father and his son hunting, nuclear power plant technicians who find themselves trapped at work while the Predator warrior does battle with an alien walker, a sensitive father whose killed right in front of his returned soldier wife and frightened daughter, etc. You have two brothers, with a troubled relationship, who must set aside their differences when terrors are threatening them. One's gorgeous girlfriend gets the goofy clichéd lines that have become standard dialogs for these kind of films, such as "We're not gonna make it, are we?" or "Maybe, they're all gone." You have the typical governmental corruption, as humans expect an airlift to rescue them with a plane under different orders. As you've probably read elsewhere, with a fine-tooth comb, you could pick this film clean because there are an endless foray of holes which pop out to snap you faster than an alien walker's second mouth..but, it goes by so fast that I barely had enough time to care. Certainly a guilty pleasure, but isn't a classic by any means of the imagination. If you can somehow turn your brain off...this might be entertaining. If anything, we get little aliens bursting from the stomachs of women, acid melting away human faces, and a combat between a Predator using the gadgetry at his disposal against a growing number of nasty, slimy-mouthed aliens. What's not to love? Cue awkward silence... |
February 23, 2009 | N/A | |||
| The Insider - R |
"I told the truth." A research chemist comes under personal and professional attack when he decides to appear in a "60 Minutes" expose on Big Tobacco. Al Pacino: Lowell Bergman Against this backdrop director Michael Mann gives us The Insider, a film every bit the equal in seriousness to All the President's Men. Russell Crowe plays Tobacco Executive Jeffrey Wigand. Al Pacino is Sixty Minutes Producer Lowell Bergman. Wigand has just been fired from his $300,000 a year job. Bergman wants help deciphering a tobacco industry document. The two of them start an uneasy relationship. The film suggests Wigand's employer began spooking his family before the executive agreed to become a whistleblower for Sixty Minutes. I doubt the truth there. Soon the two men are developing the story. The Mississippi Attorney General's office wants Wigand to testify. Reporter Mike Wallace (Christopher Plummer) is brought in to interview Wigand. Executive Producer Don Hewit (Anthony Michael Hall) is brought on board. Brown & Williamson gets wind of Wigand's betrayal. Bergman says it wasn't him who tipped B&W. Wigand begins a new job as a high school science teacher. Brown and Williamson assigns detectives to follow him and make trouble for Wigand's family. The Tobacco giant plants anti-Wigand stories in other Press outlets in anticipation of the Sixty Minutes bombshell. Wigand's wife and daughter leave him. He loses his home and the wife divorces him. The story keeps developing and the pressure builds. But the biggest problem is inside CBS itself. CBS Legal learns that Wigand has a contract with Brown & Williamson that provides for serious financial penalties if Wigand reveals ANY of its secrets, and CBS is liable too. All of a sudden the story is threatening the financial interests of the Network itself. Wallace and Hewitt agree to back off. Bergman is livid. He says CBS owner-CEO Laurence Tisch is betraying the news division because he is afraid a major liability suit will queer plans he has to sell the network to Westinghouse. Left out of the script is the news that the Tisch family owned Loews controls Lorillard, another of the seven giant tobacco companies in America. Even director Michael Mann had to make some concessions. He must have bargained away this embarassing little detail when making his own deal with CBS over what would appear in the script. Bergman has to tell Wigand the story has been squelched. After all he has had to put up with, Wigand is more than disappointed. Bergman begins leaking CBS' betrayal of the news division to other press outlets. Wallace is now angry that his own part in the coverup has been revealed. He and Bergman quarrel. The Producer is furloughed for a week by Hewitt. But CBS News has a black eye that would make Edward R. Murrow roll over in his grave. Wallace has a brilliant public relations ploy. Lets go over to Black Rock (CBS Corporate) and sell them a package that will save all our reputations. I won't tell you what the deal is though you can probably make a good guess. The film is two hours and 37 minutes long. It doesn't drag but its a very long sit for a film audience that is mostly under 30 and more interested in special effects than public affairs. In 1976 the film would have been hailed as something like the Second Coming. Today, a film like this is released with almost no fanfare. Its only hope is to capture enough awards to alert the mostly 35 and older audience that has abandoned filmgoing, at least in theatres. Two years ago, Crowe made a boffo debut in a wonderful film called LA Confidential that was soundly trounced at the Awards by the Carnivorous, youth-oriented Titanic. And Crowe, whose performance is tempered in this role, is one of the greatest screen actors to hit these shores since Marlon Brando, James Dean, George C. Scott and Tony Hopkins. Because he still insists on acting at a time when appearing in monster special effects packages is the key to success.., because of this, Crowe's success as a film actor is still not a cinch. There are other actors in this film that are wasted. Any film that would use Rip Torn as little as this one does, deserves a slap. Torn plays PR man John Scanlon, but he barely speaks a sentence. British actor Michael Gambon plays a high executive at B&W. His screentime is minimal. And Mann repeats a video clip of Gambon repeatedly. The guy who lit a welding torch to reshape the Otter's Uncle's Lincoln in Animal House 21 years ago is wonderful as one of the courtroom lawyers from Mississippi. Wings Hauser, the aptly named and wonderfully over -the-top B-movie actor who usually is larger than Richard Simmons onscreen, is subdued here as a B&W lawyer at a Mississippi court hearing. Speaking of subdued, the most interesting performance is Christopher Plummer's subtle underplaying of Mike Wallace. Plummer's Wallace almost seems to be subordinate to producer Bergman. I wonder if Wallace is really this quiet around his colleagues at the network. The Plummer portrayal is in savage contrast to the Mike Wallace we are used to on-air. Plummer makes no attempt to imitate the on-air Wallace. His delivery is sufficiently newsman-like, but it is not the hard-hitting TV character we are used to. Gina Gershon is sharp and sharklike playing the CBS Lawyer who deflates the team's hopes of putting the story on the air. And former New York Post Editor and columnist Pete Hamil plays a reporter-editor at the New York Times, one of the few Gotham publications he has not worked for. I wasn't crazy about this film, but in a debased American Cinema, the Insider stands out just because it is directed to an adult sensibility. There are many adults who will not enjoy this film. Its been a long time since Watergate. Not everyone is interested anymore. All in all this is a true masterpiece. Intellectual (which is rare in a film today), gripping, and truly mesmerizing in every sense of the meaning. This is by far among Mann's best work to date and if he churns out more treasures like this I will remain a fan forever. |
February 23, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Confessions of a Shopaholic - PG |
"Did you just type: good angles on APRs, into Google?" A college grad lands a job as a financial journalist in New York City to support where she nurtures her shopping addiction and falls for a wealthy entrepreneur. Based on the novel "Confessions of a Shopaholic" by Sophie Kinsella. Isla Fisher: Rebecca Bloomwood P.J. Hogan may be responsible for the refreshingly grim atmosphere of 2003 offering Peter Pan that tried to take away the timeless tale of the boy who wouldn't grow up away from its heavily romanticized robust roots, yet the ample book origins of Confessions of a Shopaholic, his latest film about a woman who wouldn't grow out of an excessive materialistic folly, is as substantial and as memorable as a flicker of a candle. Based from Sophie Kinsella's series of uber-popular books, this hybrid of The Devil Wears Prada and Sex and the City has all the profoundness one can expect from a Jerry Bruckheimer-funded project and a hypocritical underlying theme on anti-consumerism despite the extravaganza that's shown to us. For a romantic comedy to remain in its genre, there are certain boundaries that it mustn't wrong. So we really can't begrudge such a film for playing it safe and Confessions of a Shopaholic is successful at that. Our financially naive protagonist inadvertently finds her calling while awaiting what she feels she's always longed for, but her addictions strive to bring her down. As she reaches rock bottom she will inevitably conquer her demons and rise once again. Perhaps closer analysis may uproot a deeper message as her boss's journey contradicts her own; while he yearns not to be defined by family she discovers that it is indeed those loved ones that define her. Struggling with her debilitating obsession with shopping and the sudden collapse of her income source, Rebecca Bloomwood (Isla Fisher) unintentionally lands a job writing for a financial magazine after a drunken letter-mailing mix-up. Ironically writing about the very consumer caution of which she herself has not abided, Rebecca's innovative comparisons and unconventional metaphors for economics grants her critical acclaim, public success, and the admiration of her supportive boss Luke (Hugh Dancy). But as she draws closer to her ultimate goal of writing for renowned fashion magazine Alette, she questions her true ambitions and must determine if overcoming her "shopaholic" condition will bring her real happiness. The finding yourself story, which has the truth come out eventually, seems to keep popping up in every single romantic comedy of late, Confessions of a Shopaholic is no exception, although the supporting characters and environment that surrounds star Isla Fisher is entirely more satisfactory. In fact, her wide-eyed, perky and cheery attitude brightens the screen, even if the plot is unduly contrived and understandably formulaic. She's believable, charismatic and similar to a great many, and eye candy for the rest - which is more than can be said for most of the generic female-oriented films that flood the field of foreboding romantic finding oneself genres. Like last year's How to Lose Friends & Alienate People, Confessions of a Shopaholic revolves around the same humorous elements that made the far superior, serious executed story films of the 80s, Big and Working Girl successful: an open-minded boss who's willing to risk hiring an under qualified (or outstandingly creative) employee for the chance on a fresh point of view, and the joys of seeing said underdog rise to the top, against the norm, utilizing random luck at every turn, and combating jealous coworkers. The pattern is simple, the outcome is assured, and while no scene dares to stare originality head on, this fluffy, flamboyant romantic comedy manages to entertain unexpectedly. |
February 22, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Amadeus - R |
''I was staring through the cage of those meticulous ink strokes - at an absolute beauty.'' The incredible story of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, told in flashback mode by Antonio Salieri - now confined to an insane asylum. F. Murray Abraham: Antonio Salieri Tom Hulce: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Simply Beautiful, musical and a genius study of two men. One hell bent on destroying the other in a haze of jealousy. Amadeus is a masterpiece of music and a haunting tragic story of Mozart with a complex duality to his character. ''I heard the music of true forgiveness filling the theater, conferring on all who sat there, perfect absolution. God was singing through this little man to all the world, unstoppable, making my defeat more bitter with every passing bar.'' The beginning is genius yet gutting and in a way amusing: Tom Hulce as Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is a wonder to behold, a genius in music but his character, his laugh, his mannerisms are a vast contrast to his intellectual artistic musical vision. He's got controversial ideas that he pulls off much to the disgust of Antonio Salieri. It is not clear if Salieri the anti-God actually killed Mozart or if it was the natural order of things, but Salieri gets his comeuppance, his own "Confutatis maledictis" that is helped along by the more savvy Constanze, who knows what sort of man Salieri really is. The scene where Salieri and Mozart hammer out the Mass is one of the most exciting scenes of cinema in the '80s -- with one man sitting at a desk and the other lying in a bed! In real life, Antonio Salieri was an accomplished musician, many of whose works remain in print. His stuff fell out of favor -- but Vivaldi predated Mozart and Salieri, and his music was barely heard after his death until the 20th century! Musical tastes change -- how many discotheques are open in the 21st century? Not as many as in the 1970s, I warrant. And there are ample implications in the historical record that Salieri and Mozart got along quite well. So the story inside the beautiful decor is a libelous fiction -- in fact, it's a lot of hooey. But when have novels or films cared for historical fact over a cracking good story? And it's probably more correct to call it a parable. Mozart and Salieri aren't really meant to be embodiments of their real-life counterparts. Salieri is an archetype. And if Mozart was this much of a bozo in real life he deserved all he got. All the performances are wonderful, especially in the Emperor's court. Charles Kay is superb, Jonathan Moore is the epitome of sincerity, and Jeffrey Jones expresses more by his extreme underplaying than many more notable actors do in several movies of bluster. Sometimes you wonder if someone ought to take Jones' pulse, but you're always aware of what the emperor is thinking. The costumes perfect, the beautiful ornate locations shown in all their splendor, all effortlessly combined in a dazzling array of bewitchment and enlightenment. Us the audience begin to formulate what will happen and how plotting from madness and hatred begins to surface. When the souls of the music leap forth from the pages, when genius turns to betrayal and madness you know you have a masterpiece of grandeur and wonderment. Amadeus is a legendary masterpiece of epic proportions. |
February 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Letters from Iwo Jima - R |
''For our homeland. Until the very last man. Our duty is to stop the enemy right here. Do not expect to return home alive.'' The story of the battle of Iwo Jima between the United States and Imperial Japan during World War II, as told from the perspective of the Japanese who fought it. Ken Watanabe: General Kuribayashi A well executed movie with a powerful, historical significance. Told from the side of the Japanese as they prepare to protect Iwo Jima from American invasion. ''I don't know anything about the enemy. I thought all Americans were cowards. I was taught they were savages.'' As for the specific film itself. In just about every way imaginable, this absolutely brilliant film is a step up from Flags of our Fathers (which is not something I say easily, as "Flags" is a terrific film as well). From the acting of the incredible ensemble cast, to the film's delicate but powerful script, to the beautiful imagery of the film (the colour distortion could not be any more brilliant), to Clint Eastwood's absolutely perfect knowledge of film and what works in a film like this. ''We can die here, or we can continue fighting. Which would better serve the emperor?'' In terms of themes, the most intricate and important aspect of the film is its examination of the psyche of the warfare itself. In Flags of our Fathers, like in his earlier films such as Unforgiven, Eastwood portrays an examination and dissection of heroism and what it meant both for those who are labeled heroes and those who did the labeling. With Letters from Iwo Jima, Eastwood studies the exact opposite of the spectrum; glory. It's almost as if Eastwood is more fascinated with the Japanese comprehension of heroism than the American one. The Japanese soldiers in the film don't have such a thing as heroism to begin with. What they do have is glory and honour. They accept their clear and present defeat with humbleness and modesty, perhaps too much so as they rather take their own lives than fall into the hands of the enemy. If Flags of our Fathers was a criticism of wartime splendor and heroism, Letters from Iwo Jima is a modest glorification of these elements. In essence, with Letters from Iwo Jima, Eastwood creates a new kind of war film that stands quite apart from its counterparts both because it portrays the side of the enemy but also and especially because it takes extra special care in emphasizing the human aspect of the soldiers it depicts, humanizing and characterizing them to endless extent. As a psychological study of warfare and as a history lesson, Eastwood has crafted a truly masterful and meaningful piece that's riveting and fascinating as it is intricate and complex. One of the best films of the year. ''A day will come when they will weep and pray for your souls.'' |
February 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Flags of Our Fathers - R |
''They may have fought for their country but they died for their friends. For the man in front, for the man beside him, and if we wish to truly honor these men we should remember them the way they really were, the way my dad remembered them.'' The life stories of the six men who raised the flag at The Battle of Iwo Jima, a turning point in WWII. Ryan Phillippe: John "Doc" Bradley The film told from America's perspective. Historical, epic and well executed but boring on the whole compared to Letters. The biggest dysfunctional hiccup with Flags of our Fathers comes with the expectation that the three major players in the production bring to the table. Eastwood in particular has stemmed together three films ? Unforgiven, Mystic River and Million Dollar Baby ? that each dealt with a person of people dealing with the emotional weight of violence that they were present or about to endure. The heavy handedness of Flags of our Fathers is be right up his wheelhouse. Add the brilliant writing experience and resume of Haggis and the movie should have been celluloid gold. Instead, we deal with waving veterans, moments of tenderness between the soldiers and the families of the dead they fought beside and the emotional burden of the horrors that surrounded them in combat without any tear tugging or tissue pulling on behalf of the experiencing movie watcher. Lundsford: You actually chose the Marines because they had the best uniforms? Flags of our Fathers was filmed back-to-back with Letters from Iwo Jima which shows the Japanese perspective of the battle and is a moving mirrored story that respectfully gives the honourable view of the Japanese. While watching Flags of our Fathers, there are a few scenes of battle which feature in Letters. ''Nobody even noticed that second flag going up. Everybody saw that damn picture and made up their own story about it. But your dad and the others knew what they had done, and what they had not done. All your friends dying, it's hard enough to be called a hero for saving somebody's life. But for putting up a pole?'' Now the big exception to this slightly sub standard cast is fellow Canadian Adam Beach who plays Native American Ira Hayes. Beach definitely gets all the depth in his character that should have existed in the other characters. Hayes is met with constant racism from the battleground to the media spotlight. Hayes becomes an insatiable alcoholic from his desperate guilt in leaving his friends and fellow soldiers to battle. He feels this dedication to his people and to the country despite the racism. He has some heart wrenching speeches and moments in the film and hands down should receive an academy nomination for his moving performance. The supporting cast is who's who of Hollywood young up and comers who perhaps just didn't have the experience needed to carry the film. Barry Pepper, Jamie Bell, Paul Walker, Robert Patrick and the film lacks a certain experience to it in the cast. They needed someone top notch, a great actor (Eastwood himself would have changed the entire feel of the film if he had starred or even played a small role.) Despite a slightly under written cast the film is spectacular. It shows such a diversity from the brutality of the world war 2 battle field to the hero worship of America that stemmed from the infamous picture. The extreme opposites the film takes you through really sends a powerful message that is unforgettable. I think this film will gain a cult following like many of Eastwood's films do and it should be appreciated for it's message and it's brilliant direction by Eastwood. ''This isn't just any island to them. This isn't Tarawa, Guam, Tinian, or Saipan. This is Japanese soil, sacred ground. Twelve thousand Japanese defenders in eight square miles, they will not leave politely, gentlemen! It's up to us to convince them.'' |
February 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Bride Wars - PG |
''Sometimes you really can find that one person who will stand by you no matter what.'' Two best friends become rivals when they schedule their respective weddings on the same day. Kate Hudson: Liv The romantic comedy is a type of film that relies on two obvious traits, the ability to make its audience laugh, and the ability to make that very same audience tear-up or at least feel some degree of warmth towards the central characters' love story. Bride Wars, which ostensibly at least, takes the form of your typical rom-com is an example of such that constantly tries to do the former and only hints at the latter only in the background in order to advance plot. The result from this is a middling and sluggishly mundane feature that neither offers memorable characters or even a few cheap laughs. To be fair, there has to be something said for the fact that I am not exactly within the movie's target audience criteria. Yet judging by the reactions of those around me, I got the feeling that what I was experiencing wasn't exclusively restricted to gender. The story here, which zooms and focuses upon two best gal-pals Liv (Kate Hudson) and Emma (Anne Hathaway) as they try to cope with their simultaneous weddings, is one that is likely to get a few chuckles from females, but less so with their male counterparts. Yes, this is somewhat expectant of a movie titled Bride Wars, but then again, if half of your audience are neglected to the sidelines then you're needlessly cutting yourself short. This stunted, polarizing depiction of "every girl's biggest day" feels fitting to its source material, so women will enjoy this moreso than men, but not by much. You see, aside from the fact that Bride Wars wants nothing more than to cater to cheap gags and sappy melodrama fit to please the Legally Blonde enthusiasts, there also remains blatant problems in just about everything else that fills the movie's first two acts. With little romance to back up the flimsy plot, dull, dry characterization coupled with non-existent chemistry between either the friends and their partners, or even themselves, the vast majority of Bride Wars turns ugly, rather quickly, the movie pushes that this cat fight between Hudson and Hathaway is meant to be fun and airy with plenty of laughs, but it's too transparent and formulated to even move beyond dry caricature. It doesn't help at all that the majority of the performances from the main cast are remotely daft. Hudson and Hathaway, who are supposed to playing long-time best buddies whom suddenly fall out over a petty dispute, are strangely forgettable, if not repelling, like a pair of unidentifiable twins. In all fairness, both hit the proverbial hammer on the head with their portrayals as stock-pile, cardboard cut-out typecasts befitting of the genre and only the genre, but this isn't exactly saying much. The remainder of the cast, who each have around ten minutes tops of total screen time are just as unremarkable, with Kristen Johnston giving the movie its only real favour and edge. So, what's worse than a romantic comedy with next to no compelling or memorable performances? Not much. To be lenient however, Bride Wars isn't really a romance at all. At least, that's what I derived director Gary Winick was trying to put across. If anything, the movie exists more as a mildly poignant example of companionship in the form of friends rather than romance. This tangent, which takes full form in the third act, for the most part surpasses the drudgery that comes beforehand, and establishes a touching, if slightly overly done sentimental climax. By all means, it's far too little, too late, but I at least found myself moved by the movie's final statement, even if it was by means of extreme contrast. Yet had Winick went with this theme for the majority of his film, rather than save it for after all the silly, perfunctory cat fight scenes that in turn just about destroy all human shades within his characters, Bride Wars could have been a much more flowing, and relevant feature instead of a strangely wafer thin comedy piece. Instead it exists simply as throwaway popcorn fodder for girls on a night out who have nothing better to do than to revisit the same old characters, wacky situations and sit-com dialogue typical of your average Top Model episode. This is certainly no Devil Wears Prada and it's definitely not going to be affirmatively, kept in memory. ''...But there's also the chance that the one person you can count on for a lifetime, the one person who knows you sometimes better than you know yourself is the same person who's been standing beside you all along.'' |
February 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Role Models - R |
Danny: Pick us up in two hours. Ronnie: Fuck you, Miss Daisy. Wild behavior forces a pair of energy drink reps to enroll in a Big Brother program. Seann William Scott: Wheeler In Hollywood, there is no denying that most releases of the year follow certain formulas or structures plot-wise. When it comes to comedy, there's usually the family-pushed sugar-fest and the profane, adult-orientated kind; it seems kind of perplexing, but the two very rarely meet in the middle. Enter Role Models, which for all intents and purposes does nothing remotely new in terms of storytelling. This is straight forward, buddy movie material with little to no divergence from the typical standard expected from sappy morally toned family comedy that is given to us near enough every month in some form. Yet, working in its corner, and it's something which I'm conflicted about as to whether it truly works or not, is its adult themed characters and humour. There's no doubt about it, David Wain's movie is a lot more amusing than your average farcical comedy fare, and it has an amusing soft center story too, but it too often falls on its face because of a sense of ill-focused material; Role Models is entertaining stuff sure, but an incoherency in tone prevents the film from ever taking off and connecting with its audience. The script here follows a rather standard three act curve. We begin the story with goof-ball Wheeler(Seann William Scott) and Danny Donahue(Paul Rudd), two spokespeople for an energy drinks company that speaks to schools about doing their drink in place of drugs. After a really bad (but hilarious) day however, the two end up with 150 hours of community service, having to look after kids from the Little Wing Foundation. What ensues from here is nothing out of the ordinary; it's material we've all seen before so many times, from putting perspective into life, cherishing friends and being an individual in the face of conforming to society. Yes, it's been done to death, yet there remains a certain sweet, well constructed charm to the way in which Role Models plays it out. Some of it has something to do with the movie's adult sense of humour, but much of it really lies in its adult sense of direction. ''Me and the judge have a special relationship... I don't wanna get too graphic but I sucked his dick for cocaine.'' Going against the grain, Role Models blends farce and caricature with modestly rounded characters and adult situations. The person who sticks out most is Rudd's character, who is given a healthy dose of development from beginning to end, fleshing him out as a compelling character that isn't afraid to get his ego diminished. Sure, it isn't anything remotely revolutionary in terms of character design, but Rudd does well with what he is given and gives the story a human quality. His on-screen buddy Wheeler, played by William Scott is less of a character and more of a walking vehicle for laughs, it's something Scott has gotten used to over the years and he does what is asked of him, bringing in the movie's biggest laughs with ease. Christopher Mintz-Plasse, who shot to stardom with his debut in Superbad here shows he's no one hit wonder either, playing a similar albeit just as amusing persona. His opposite of sorts comes in the form of Bobb'e J. Thompson as a foul mouthed delinquent with a tough shell covering a big heart. Thompson, much like his direct co-star is used mainly for comical purposes, but his performance is always laughter-inducing. As much as I enjoyed Role Models however, there were moments in between all this great adult storytelling where I felt like I was relapsing into Daddy Day Care. This sometimes contradictory tone that Wain adopts seems out of place; with a script such as Role Models', you would think that the direction and focus would simply be on delivering an adult story, yet it seems that the movie tries to accommodate younger audiences (that won't be there of course, unless they sneak in). Nevertheless, with such a tone, the movie does achieve a sense of whimsical charm that a lack of such sometimes brings the average raunchy, profane comedy down. The problem here isn't that Wain tries to lighten things up every now and again, but that he does so far too often. ''I'm not here to service you, I'm here to service these young boys.'' |
February 18, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Gone Baby Gone - R |
''I couldn't stop running it over and over and over in my mind. The vague and distant suspicion that we never understood what happened that night; what our role was. Or maybe it was just like the hundreds of other children who disappear each year and never return. Amanda was even more haunting for never being found.'' Two Boston area detectives investigate a little girl's kidnapping, which ultimately turns into a crisis both professionally and personally. Based on the Dennis Lehane novel. Casey Affleck: Patrick Kenzie In his directorial debut, Ben Affleck has completely morphed himself into an emerging artist and even more talented director. Gone Baby Gone might be the most innovative and moral challenging film of recent years. This is the story of young Amanda, a little girl who mysteriously disappears from her home and the activity and dangers that befall upon the people involved in her rescue. The film stars Affleck's brother Casey as Patrick, in his most challenging and engrossing performance to date. Not since Sean Penn in Mystic River has a role been so subdued yet immensely victorious and depth defying in choice of delivery and spot on emotions. Casey Affleck has paved the way for himself in roles that demonstrate the actor's showcase and give the performer range. It's a bit odd what to make of the younger Affleck in the upcoming awards season. He fairs a better shot for his earlier raved performance in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford for a nomination, but his performance in Gone Baby Gone is just as important. Ben Affleck is completely in control of proceedings, which he has lacked in his acting. He knows what the mission is of this picture and would gladly take a spot amongst some bigger, older talents among Oscar prospects this year. Along with Co-adapting the film with Aaron Stockard, if Oscar is feeling like inviting Affleck to the Kodak, the screenplay category seems like a better fit, especially with an already win for Good Will Hunting. Other possibilities for consideration is wonderful cinematography by John Toll and a great musical score by Harry Gregson-Williams. Comparisons to Mystic River are all about, being done by the same author how could we expect no less. Mystic River had more of the message of the domino effect of one's actions on others, Gone Baby Gone brings it to a whole new level and scope. This film is about a society, a society who has lost the importance of innocence and the beauty of life. It focuses on the beauty of children and rest assure, when the film is over, if you're not yearning to be a better parent of embrace a child as a blessing, there is probably emptiness in your chest. This film is altogether realistic, truthful, beautiful and spectacular. A must-see film of the year and a pleasant surprise coming from Ben Affleck. |
February 17, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Mongol - R |
''All Mongols fear the thunder.'' The story recounts the early life of Genghis Khan who was a slave before going on to conquer half the world including Russia in 1206. Tadanobu Asano: Temudjin ''Be strong... and ask our Lord of the blue sky, great Tengri... to help you.'' The film and story of Mongol gives us the early beginnings of Khan's life, his name Temudjin and his humble origins and beginnings. It depicts the struggles and harsh times he experiences even at a young age of nine. The major part of the story is a telling of his early childhood and his growing up by Temudjin himself, now in captivity. Being a story of his growing up, most of the emphasis lies in lessons, learning the ways of life. To fear, to be brave, to defy, to make friends, and so on and so forth. The film shows us Temudjin's slow transformation from being the oppressed son of a Khan, awaiting death once he is found by his foes who want the title of Khan, to his becoming the great Khan himself. Temudjin: I'm letting a brother go free. At it's heart Mongol is as historical inaccurate as any other Hollywood flick and in addition it lacks consistency: in this movie things just happen without any explanation. An example: the opening scene shows us Temudjin as prisoner in a Chinese town. He looks to be in his late thirties. Wait a moment, I thought, wasn't he by then khan of all Mongols? Yes, but not according to the movie. Another example: at the end of the movie his wife liberates Temudjin from the Chinese by bribing the guards and posing as a rich woman. But when she travels to the city, she has no money and she pays a merchant for the trip with sex. The merchant then disappears. Did she kill him and take his money? We are not told. More: Temudjin travels back and he is able to raise a big army out of the blue in no time. How? Where? What? Who? And more: Temudjin becomes the blood brother of Jamukha, one sons of the most powerful of khans. Why? It just happens. Mongol simply put, has stunning cinematography, a sumptuous score by Tuomas Kantelinen, and battle scenes that are thrilling though not stomach turning. While there are the expected swinging swords and pools of blood, the killing is mostly impressionistic and the visuals never overwhelm us. Mongol has been called hagiography, but it is grand storytelling with a humanistic bent in which personal relationships overwhelm bloody conflict. Asano's craft is such that we identify with the Mongol leader who, after being forced into slavery, emerges as a unifying and compelling figure who earns our respect. Though the film does not strive for innovation, when Temudgin calls on the Mongol God Tegri for assistance and receives it, we know that we are in an otherworldly place. Bordering on 300's artistic range of originality and artistic license, we are given sequences where Mongols are scared to fight in a battle due to lightening and storms. Suggesting perhaps a factor of luck was perhaps in Temudgin's favour, yet there has plenty of trials to suggest he is a powerful and resourceful leader and fighter. So Mongol gives us a range of mixed messages, ones of superstition yet strategy, love yet tradition, and it also gives us a beginning to a very complex character and formidable leader of the past. ''Mongols need laws. |
February 15, 2009 | N/A |