| Movie | Rating | Review | Date | Your Rating | Match | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Reader - R |
''I'm not frightened. I'm not frightened of anything. The more I suffer, the more I love. Danger will only increase my love. It will sharpen it, forgive its vice. I will be the only angel you need. You will leave life even more beautiful than you ended it. Heaven will take you back and look at you and say: Only one thing can make a soul complete and that thing is love.'' Post-WWII Germany: Nearly a decade after his affair with an older woman came to a mysterious end, law student Michael Berg re-encounters his former lover as she defends herself in a war-crime trial. Ralph Fiennes: Michael Berg The Reader is one of those diverse films and stories that has the eccentric audacity to be both moving, emotional, historical yet also focusing on aspects such as relationships, justice and forms of love. With an astounding cast of formidable weight, a script that echoes measures and doses of genius, and locations fitting of a Post-War Germany, The Reader succeeds in being a successful insight into a faceted range of characters. Especially the main two, Hannah Schmitz and Michael Berg, both with completely different personas and a bonding unseen by many, but coming across as rare and tranquil. We have the unlikely bond that presents itself between them in an unusual series of events which brings the pair together, we have the age gap the two have arise, and a love sparked about by a chance encounter. From here The Reader begins in giving us an unusual romance yet proceeds in giving us a story which is in fact deeper and tragic all at the same time. The story cleverly switches between past and present, in carefully stitched sequences which ultimately tell the tale of the two characters. Hannah is the lonely woman who takes into her affection and confidence the innocent and clever Michael, yet shows a hidden past and secrets which are present, the more you scratch past the surface. The Reader is one of those films which has the unfortunate premise of being underrated and undervalued by many viewers, due to the fact it's not necessarily mainstream fodder. I'd highly recommend this film, The Reader is a vision of the past and yet a timeless account of a relationship, a bond, and a tragic trial of a woman whom made up for her mistakes. When we find she was previously a Nazi, an SS member, it's not the plain truth being found out, it's the reasons and redeeming qualities that make up for her misdeeds in the past. Ultimately what happens is tragic, it is a cruelly life portrayed, yet it's suffering and beauty echoes far into boundless leaps of eternities embrace. |
February 11, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Valkyrie - PG-13 |
''I'm a soldier, but in serving my country, I have betrayed my conscience.'' Based on actual events, a plot to assassinate Hitler is unfurled during the height of WWII. Tom Cruise: Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg The story of Valkyrie starts by giving us a haunting memoir of the Nazi oath of allegiance to Hitler, a token of total obedience to the Fuhrer, to Hitler. We are given the title transitioning from German to English. Then moving on, we are shown Hitler visiting a base camp in Germany, and a nervous General Trescow(Kenneth Branagh) onlooking. As Hitler prepares to depart, Trescow and an associate hide a bomb in a gift case of drink, and give to a man on Hitler's plane, but it fails to detonate in flight, and Trescow must return to headquarters to retrieve it. Once he arrives, he meets up with who is revealed as a fellow conspirator, a General Olbricht(twitchy Bill Nighy). Trescow safely retrieves the wine case and he and Olbrict discuss a member of their secret committee who was recently arrested. Trescow recommends Olbricht contact Colonel Stauffenberg as a replacement, which Olbricht does, and introduces Stauffenberg to one of the clandestine meetings. ''To understand National Socialism, you must understand Wagner.'' In the meeting, Stauffenberg meets three of the most important figures in the resistance. A Dr. Goerdeler, who will become Chancellor of Germany should the plot succeed, a General Beck, who will lead the Armed Forces, and a man named Witzleben. After tempers flare, Stauffenberg agrees to help. At a later meeting, Stauffenberg suggests they utilize Operation Valkyrie, which is a plan that uses the Reserve Army to keep amongst the Germany country should anything disrupt communications from Hitler, or should Hitler be killed. Stauffenberg rewrites the order to exclude the SS from taking control, which would leave the head of the Reserve Army, General Fromm, in charge of Germany. Reaching out to General Fromm, Stauffenberg and Olbricht are surprised at his rejection, but Fromm keeps quiet, choosing to neither support the dissenters nor reports them to the authorities. Meanwhile, General Trescow is sent to the front lines. Stauffenberg is promoted to head of the plan, and he, along with his assistant Lieutenant Haeften, take the order to the Berghof to be signed off by Hitler himself. Hitler, with his inner circle present, praises Stauffenberg's loss of appendages as the attitude necessary for his military, and states Stauffenberg is the ideal German. He then signs off on the bill, saying he's sure the changes are adequate. The Operation Valkyrie of the title, was a plan developed for the Reserve portion of the German Army and approved by Hitler himself. It was intended to be used in the event of a breakdown in law and order within Germany or the countries it occupied, a breakdown caused by Hitler's death or civil unrest. A group of officers who were a part of the German Resistance to Hitler, could see the way the war was heading, that Europe was being laid waste and Germany was losing, and they were also disturbed at aspects of Nazi rule - the Death Camps for instance and the killing of civilians ? so they plotted to kill Hitler and utilize an amended Operation Valkyrie for their own ends to take control of the nation after Hitler's death and to negotiate a truce with the Allies. If it had worked, they would have used Hitler's own plan against him. But crucial to the plan was Hitler's death. The plot was aborted once, and when finally carried out in 1944, failed to kill its target. Poor communication, indecision on the part of some of the plotters and a late start in implementing Valkyrie led to complete failure and within hours all the plotters had been rounded up and executed. ''You can serve Germany, or the Fuhrer. Not both!'' The plot was lead by Colonel Stauffenberg (Tom Cruise) who was put in charge of Valkyrie and made Chief of Staff to General Fromm, after being badly injured fighting in N. Africa. He had access to Hitler but was also to be vital in the follow up to the assassination, which according to a source I read, ruled out a suicide attack. Which was a pity, because as I watched this, I couldn't help pondering how much the course of history might have been changed had Stauffenberg chosen the current favoured method of assassins, the suicide bomb. Had he got closer to Hitler at that fateful meeting and sacrificed himself, instead of leaving the bomb under a solidly built wooden table which helped shield the Fuhrer from the blast, the whole course of history since 1944 might have been different. Still, it wasn't to be. Hitler was dead anyway nine months later, committing suicide in his Berlin bunker as the Allies approached. Berlin was carved up amongst the Allies, the Death Camps were finally liberated and the Cold War began. Overall, Valkyrie is a historical, accurate portrayal of a group willing to stand up against corruption and decadence, a man whom sacrifices so much for his Country and one whom is willing to stand up to a sadistic mass murdering proclaimed dictator. This film Bryan Singer has given us, works, it clicks and it also gives us a tense thriller laced with intrigue and a story that needs telling, needs emphasis and passion in it's passionate attempts to take us back to a time of great suffering and injustice. With most films with this type of plot and story telling we know the end, but that's not what's compelling, it's the journey. ''Long live sacred Germany!'' |
February 4, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Alexander - R |
''Fortune favours the bold.'' A film of the most successful, tactical leader in history Alexander. Which spans over his life and campaign conquering Persia & Asia. Oliver Stone's epic film now comes in three versions. Ive had to alter my review and rating reflecting this, the three versions are as follows: Alexander(Theatrical version) 3.5 Stars
Shorter and more enjoyable for impatient audiences, well edited but still missing that extra flair. Alexander Revisited(The Final Cut) 3.5 Stars After seeing The Final Cut it's redeemed the whole film. Detailed battles and characters and a better level of understanding and appreciation. Colin Farrell as Alexander is not my personal choice for the role. After re-watching I do feel he does a reasonable job yet the Irish twang's in his accent take a while to adjust too. The battle sequences, music from Vangelis and the extra detail have revamped my interest in this film, on seeing it at the cinema i was disappointed yet seeing all the things missed out its epic and informative. To conclude it's one of those films that needs re-watching and re-evaluating, and maybe casting Colin as Alexander not advisable. On research this film received some good reviews as well as less understandable ones. To conclude its one of those long epic films thats so long you will lose interest perhaps at cinema. On DVD it gives you a chance to recover or rest. Same as Troy in it's beautiful executed manner yet it needed more adrenaline like the bicep bulging 300. |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Troy - R |
''I'll tell you a secret. Something they don't teach you in your temple. The Gods envy us. They envy us because we're mortal, because any moment might be our last. Everything is more beautiful because we're doomed. You will never be lovelier than you are now. We will never be here again.'' An adaptation of Homer's great epic, the film follows the assault on Troy by the united Greek forces and chronicles the fates of the men involved. Brad Pitt: Achilles The release and making of Troy held slightly unfair, overblown expectations. All critics expected it to be, just like Gladiator. But why on earth would it be? They are not the same. A few points include: they're not set in the same period, the same country, nor are they about a similar topic. One is about a war, the other a personal vendetta. One is made up, the other is based on stories told over 3,000 years ago. In fact, one could almost say that the only things they have in common are sandals and swords. Oh, and remarkably everyone speaks English. Which is helpful for lazy western audiences. Troy is a horrendously budgeted epic, and this clearly shows in its impressive production values, whether it's the awesome sight of the 1,000 ships sailing across the Aegean Sea, or the brutal battle scenes, everything looks right. However, whilst this is all well and good, problems Troy stem from the source material. ''I've fought many wars in my time. Some I've fought for land, some for power, some for glory. I suppose fighting for love makes more sense than all the rest.'' The credits claim the film was "inspired by The Iliad", and here is the first error. The film is historically inaccurate and incorrect, and this is most obvious towards the end. The Iliad is the story of Achilles, and does not involve the infamous Wooden Horse, or even the sack of Troy. These are covered in later epics The Odyssey and Virgil's The Aeneid. It's as if the director never read these works, and made up the rest of the story as he went along. Not that it makes too much difference to the story, but those familiar with the epics will feel cheated. Also the motives for the war, whilst they made absolute sense in the society in which the stories were first told, don't hold true anymore. In the epics the stories were concerned with heroes, honour and love. That this war was started because Paris stole someone else's girl just doesn't sit well with a modern audience, and so they cannot relate to these heroes. It doesn't help with the fact that the audience doesn't know which side they should be rooting for? there are in the stories, no real goodies and baddies, merely two nations each with their own heroes. The director has to take time every now and again to reiterate the reasons for the war, that of Paris' love for Helen, but tries to give a more believable reason by giving Brian Cox's character of Agamemnon a more imperialistic bent, deviating further from his source. I've envisioned Troy to seem like a disaster, but it is in fact not a complete loss. If the audience can just accept the reasons for the war, then there is little problem in enjoying the rest of the film. The beginning is slow to get going, but once Achilles (Brad Pitt) and Hector (Eric Bana) have their one-on-one clash, the film reaches a momentum it does not lose. The battle scenes easily rival any seen on the big screen to date, and most of the cast do an impressive job in portraying their heroes in varying degrees of suffering. Honours should be given to Eric Bana for his role as the suitably regal heir to Troy, who suffers the wrath of Achilles in a simply choreographed yet remarkably compelling clash, and to Peter O'Toole who plays Hector's father and king of Troy, Priam. Also, contrary to most critical response, Brad Pitt plays the character of Achilles with a suitable display of bravery, power and shows one hell of a temper, even though after his fight with Hector his motivation for staying is lost. Orlando Bloom's Paris is a little weak, turning into Legolas without the contacts and blonde wig, towards the end, and Diane Kruger's Helen lacks dimensionality, but other than this, the cast are fine. Aside from a few niggles - including a fairly clunky script which does the film no favours - and an extensive running time, Troy is an enjoyable film, which deserves to sit high up in the ranks of sword-and-sandal epics. |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Linha de Passe - Unrated | Portuguese/Indie film. | February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Gomorrah (Gomorra) - Unrated | Italian/Indie film. | February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Mýrin (Jar City) - Unrated |
Looks appealing. Indie/Foreign. Icelandic. |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Hunger - Unrated | Irish/Indie film. | February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Die Welle (The Wave) - Unrated | German/Indie. | February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Il y a Longtemps que Je T'aime (I've Loved You So Long) - PG-13 | French/Indie. | February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| The Wrestler - R |
''I'm an old broken down piece of meat and I deserve to be all alone, I just don't want you to hate me.'' A drama centered on retired professional wrestler Randy "The Ram" Robinson as he makes his way through the independent circuit... Mickey Rourke: Randy 'The Ram' Robinson Darren Aronofsky has always been a Director whom has been close to my heart. Whether it was the film that blew my world away, the much loved The Fountain, or the cryptic puzzler Pi, or the emotionally entrancing Requiem for a Dream, whether it's any of these Darren always proves to be a man of vision. Why am I not surprised Aronofsky's latest, The Wrestler proves to be equally successful? It's because it's a firestorm of truth, a blur of sophistication and a hurricane of a man's struggle with his career and life. Let's just say Mickey Rourke was born to play this part, Mickey is in my eyes The Ram, he envelopes the part and engulfs it as his own. It's magical, wondrous and dazzling without even breaking a sweat. The Wrestler isn't just about wrestling, but about a man, about this living, breathing being, whom is alone, and lonely. His passion is his hope, his hope is life and when his daughter doesn't want to know, and a potential new love of his life, he is a broken man. He has only one thing left, and age and a bad heart have caught up with him, he has to go back to the only thing he knows. ''The eighties fucking ruled, man, until that pussy Cobain came and fucked it all up.'' Another shining light of The Wrestler is the gorgeous music by Clint Mansell, using a combination of rock and heavy composites, with dazzling results. Shots are used effectively albeit shakily, different to anything Aronofsky has ever done. The backward shooting of Rourke or his daughter is used effectively, as done in a part of Dark Knight, and numerous video games. It's an original way of panning and capturing a moment or series of events. Overall, The Wrestler is a very powerful film about love, passion and loneliness. A love for something you can't live without, a life that knows Wrestling, that sacrifice is not an option,where anything is possible no matter what the consequence. Mickey Rourke is the reason to see this film, his performance is the best of his career, his Sin City gravelly voice is a pleasure to hear and his body the pinnacle of experience and ripe for this role. Darren Aronofsky and Rourke etch out a place in time for a notch in greatness, the ending being one that leaves what happens, up to our imaginations, and Darren knows this is the cleverest way to play upon us. For leaving it open to suggestion and discussion, is to envision and emblazon one thing to us, and that is a message of hope. ''In this life you can lose everything you love, everything that loves you. Alot of people told me that I'd never wrestle again, the only one that's gonna tell me when I'm through doing my thing, is you people here.'' |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Vicky Cristina Barcelona - PG-13 | February 3, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| The Fountain - PG-13 |
![]() The Fountain is one of the deepest movies I've ever had the pleasure to witness. If you follow it through to its conclusion and are open minded, a deep thinker then it becomes gratifyingly mind-blowing. As for the tree of life and Izzi's book, is it real? Is she the tree? Or maybe Tom and Izzi are both a combined element of the tree in the end, the Tree representing or being their eternal love in essence them. Guess the main message is accepting death and its hard to lose a loved one. I could watch this film over and over, and still pick up different ideas from it. People will understand this film one day, maybe when were more evolved mentally, we've all closed our minds. I think to the best of my ability I understand The Fountain now. I accept what other people think because end of the day I'm in awe of something that is unlike most material, that isn't afraid of being hated by a religious or material obsessed public. Always seems whatever card you play, the more stupid people become. The tree she is, he is, entwined in love. Some people think this film is about death or life, that it is sad, the truth is in between, death is the road to awe. ''I'm sorry father, for you there is only death. But our destiny is life!'' Death as a means of life, falls on deaf ears in todays zombie-like society. All in our little boxes or one track thoughts. We want a movie that has a basic plot, simple characters, that forever keep changing titles but in essence end up all the same. Well I don't want that, thats why Fountain is so special to me because it explores the whole notion of Death, Rebirth and Love, not to mention the difficult process of losing a loved one and how we would do anything to save them. In essence sometimes we can't change something that's destined to happen, which begs for the old acceptance and to let the river run its course which remains the real message. The Fountain is neither stereotypically happy or sad to me, in the end its resolute, a simple Zen-like fable bordering on rebirth and love eternal. The parts played beautifully by Hugh Jackman and Rachael Weisz and the love they feel for each other is for me genuinely believable. One scene near the end where he is looking at her like an embodiment of memories, of realities where the Queen Isabella and Izzy merge, is wondrous to behold. Which begs me to wonder if the book Izzi writes isn't something made up from her imagination but one where she has remembered a previous life. Queen Isabella being one of he incarnations. Aztec beliefs also strangely mirror Buddhist ideas in a ''Death is the road to Awe'' sacrificial sense, underlining First Father and Rebirth. Which also makes me think the future Tom, is he not Tom at all or the embodiment of First Father. In essence is he First Father? ''All these years, all these memories, there was you. You pull me through time.'' Darren Aronofsky is a genius and the greatest film-maker of our time. He is a visionary, and one of the greatest unique script writers out there. Hugh Jackman's performance ranks among the greatest male screen performances in unappreciated movie history. Rachel Weisv is amazing, as is Ellen Burnstyn, and Sean Patrick Thomas. Clint Mansell teams up with The Kronos Quartet and the Scottish rock band Mogwai to bring us some of the most beautiful and epic music I have ever experienced upon thy ears. Matthew Libatique's cinematography is breath taking too making a worthy companion to the rendition of sound. It is so simple, yet so effective and so hypnotic. Jay Robinowitz deserves special mention here because the story is so well put together it flows, and as an editor myself, I can understand how hard that must have been. The three time lines weave in and out of each other flawlessly. Darren Aronofsky has a talent for looking at things that I think is so close to my own reflection and thoughts on higher things. Upon reflection Fountain is very similar to Requiem but does it in a more spiritual approach. Darren's fascination with Mortality has always been there, just go back to Pi with the conversation at that Coffee Shop concerning the Tree Of life. The Fountain will cut Movie Lovers down the middle one half thinking it's cult inducing hippy trash about some bald guy in a bubble and the other half truly seeing it for the deep visual entrancing Journey of one man's struggle with Death, in a race against time to try to save his wife. A masterpiece of Film Fountain belongs with 2001 and even Requiem for it's higher meaningful depictions. Each time I watch it there's always another piece, another juicy mesmerizing question raised that I didn't see before. ''Our bodies are prisons for our souls. Our skin and blood, the iron bars of confinement. But fear not. All flesh decays. Death turns all to ash. And thus, death frees every soul.'' Overall, The Fountain uses each three segments and strands of the singular story to represent and reflect one another. A Grand Inquisitor begins to mirror Izzi's cancer, the future Tom mirroring life going on for the living, the present Tom having to go on with existence. The tree dying being one and the same as the situation of the dying wife. The Fountain is an answer and rubix cube of a cycle, the cycle being death and life. When we see each reality most will interpret these three strains as singular paths of different existence. The only one of relevance linking them all together is the present, the past one being Izzi's mind. When we come to the end sequence, it shows us something mind blowing that's hard to comprehend, and also something that is a revelation of the film's ultimate answer. It's answer being not one of eternal life, rather one of mortality, struggle and acceptance yet again. Izzi shows us in her book, Tom's past mind set, one of unrelenting unwavering head long brashness. Hence why he drinks from the tree of life he is consumed by it, unready. Yet in this act Tom and Izzi's minds connect future with past, catching present in the middle in harmonic proportions. The answer that remains is that memories, love, death, and time are impossible to fight, quite like swimming up river, fighting against the current, when really you should be going with the flow. With The Fountain, my advice, go with the flow, and reap the rewards. ''Death is the road to awe.'' |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Pi - R |
![]() ''There will be no order, only chaos.'' A paranoid mathematician searches for a key number that will unlock the universal patterns found in nature. Sean Gullette: Maximillian Cohen Max is a mathematician who tries to find the perfect number/equation to life, to everything. Upon finding it, people will do anything to get what he knows. Beautiful sounds and music, fantastic camera work are a few aspects Pi has to offer. The whole flashes, views through keyholes, the ants, the black and white filming intensifies the ordeal that is Pi. I liked the Jewish lettering and numbering system. Was especially fascinating with some awe defining comparisons and links to certain symbolic aspects within the Torah. Very meaningful quotes for instance, the following examples:
Pi is perfected in it's capturing of numbers and the mixture of faith and religion. Even in religions and nature numbers are in everything, which begs the idea that God, the big everything, or whatever you believe, patterns are in everything, reflecting how numbers are everywhere. Some interesting ambient music from some surreal groups too like Aphex Twin, orbital, Ront Size, Massive attack, David Holmes, Autechre and Clint Mansell.The whole film is surreal,beautiful and shot so differently yet originally. Reminds me of the Silent Hill video games on parts the way it messes with your head and stretches your fear of the unknown. Also is similar to Taxi-driver how its main guy seems to plummet and be consumed, by craziness and chaos. How you get to the stage where you snap and there's no going back. Watch immediately if you are into deep films because Pi certainly is near the top of the pile. His dogmatic refusal to accept the world as a place of chaos which neither he nor anyone else can fully or even partially control lead him to the idea that there is an inherent order in the universe and that it - like absolutely everything else - is based on clean and understandable numerical laws and principles. It isn't a coincidence that it was a look at the Sun that triggered this in him; the Sun is round after all, the symbol of life (on Earth, at least) and the Pi value - which is something mathematicians have been working on for centuries - is related to the computation of a circle. He refuses to accept the existence of a world in which there is no order - however blurry and elusive that order may be. He believes that he will get to that number - which he finds out consists of a sequence of 216 numbers - best by analyzing the world stock markets, and later even the numerical significance of texts in the Torah. And as he gets closer to the truth/the number/the pattern i.e. to giving order a name, or a numerical value to the (non)chaos, ironically his own life gets increasingly chaotic: he suffers illusions, the old man gets a stroke, the fanatical Jewish organization is after him, the stock-broker firm is pursuing him, the attacks get worse, etc. In the subway-station hallucination he sees a brain and he instinctively wants to poke it with a pen; this is perhaps subject to free interpretation, but I believe that this is his sub-conscious wish to lobotomize himself, i.e. free himself from the miserable, manic, and uncomfortable existence which has been torturing his mind (and body) for so long. There is an implied, certain amount of self-hate in him; he hates the part of him which seeks this number. His old friend, it seems, knows more about Max's quest than he'd admit, because he was there once, too. He warns Max about continuing his search; he tells him that it's both futile and leads to self-destruction. But self-destruction or at least the sort-of lobotomical self-destruction is perhaps what Max wants. He seeks the answer so that he can finally rest. Faith is indeed in chaos, a myriad of God, man and math. ''Something's going on. It has to do with that number. There's an answer in that number.''
|
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| V for Vendetta - R |
![]() ''I told you, only truth. For 20 years, I sought only this day. Nothing else existed... until I saw you. Then everything changed. I fell in love with you Evey. And to think I no longer believed I could.'' A shadowy freedom fighter known only as "V" uses terrorist tactics to fight against his totalitarian society. Upon rescuing a girl from the secret police, he also finds his best chance at having an ally and maybe a companion. Natalie Portman: Evey Hugo Weaving: V ''The only verdict is vengeance, a vendetta, held as a votive not in vain.'' Set in a fascist controlled Britain, V is inspired by the graphic novel by Alan Moore. Resulting in this superb grand masterpiece. Scarily enough it also has parallels with what is actually happening now, and how this country really is on the same spiraling road into a hell of its own making. Notice the Gordon Brown look alike, the dictator Police-State, the controlling system, propaganda laden News and Terrorists being blamed for the own Governments evil doings. It's thought provoking aspects like these that make V a very interesting piece indeed. This paralleled state of existence not far from our blurry own. The plot of V for Vendetta is surprisingly complex and expertly stitched together, and I don't want to divulge any juicy details. Suffice it to say that a masked anarchist (Hugo Weaving) must save a young woman (Natalie Portman) during his attempt to expose a corrupt flawed government. Weaving is perfectly cast, using his formidable physicality and imposing voice to give gravitas to the insanity of the character. ''Strength through unity. Unity through faith.'' The Wachowski Brothers former colleague, James McTiegue, takes on the directing tasks here and steers an enormously impressive first feature, using every means available, in a manner reminiscent of his mentors breakout hit The Matrix. Unlike Matrix, McTiegue allows the story to be more of a focus, and as a result the film is a tense yet emotional storm, with outbursts of spectacularly filmed and choreographed action. Showing more maturity and restraint than the Wachowskis ever did, McTiegue doesn't show off, and his trickery isn't self conscious. When slow-motion overtakes a late action sequence, it seems extremely natural yet believable. The late cinematographer Adrian Biddle (V is dedicated to his memory) does an outstanding job, Oscar-nominated Dario Marianelli's score is a fantastic accompaniment to the piece, setting your emotions ablaze like V, and the visual effects are astonishing, terrifying, and deeply moving, especially in the climatic moments. With solid acting, great action, and fantastic technical wizardry, it sounds just like another Matrix clone. But the biggest difference in V is that it is a story of real ideas - not a fantastic, science fiction creation, but a genuine examination of the human condition. The power of fear takes center stage here, the fear of war, of disease, of famine. Fear is a basic human nature, and has been exploited as a weapon, a method of control, for centuries. And for those who would use it against the innocent, a masked avenger waits in the shadows to deal justice and vengeance. There was also a strange debate over the quality of adaptation the Wachowski Brothers offered to Alan Moore's original graphic novel. Moore has publicly separated himself from the film, quoting in the New York Times at the time, that ''the screenplay's rubbish''. Well, before we all walk away from the project, remember primly that Alan Moore will be the first to tell you himself that he is a selfish, pretentious prick. He knows it, we know it, enough said. Moving on... The screenplay's fine which you may have determined from what I have said already. In fact, it's again a masterpiece, and I cannot stress this fact enough. What the Wachowski Brothers have done is find the right balance between the theatrics of the graphic novel, and the solemnity to the richly Victorian narrative. They form a dynamic that plays to both sides, allowing for a story that sparks both political debate and giddy entertainment. We'll first shake our heads at the sentimental, soft-focus flashbacks and intriguing sub-plot for nuclear human experimentation but when mulled over, we realize it's just the comic book mentality showing its true colours. After all, V wouldn't start all his sentences with v-words had this film shunned its comic roots. ''A building is a symbol, as is the act of destroying it. Symbols are given power by people. A symbol, in and of itself is powerless, but with enough people behind it, blowing up a building can change the world.'' Revolutionary, thought provoking, V for Vendetta isn't just a comic book/graphic Novel adaptation but a political stab at the world we live in. Yet again a powerful idea can prove the most moving aspect! Music is atmospheric and the scene with Natalie in the rain with arms held up in a pose of rebirth is phenomenal. Makes me shudder with the combined piece of music, very emotional. One man's variable quest for Vengeance. ''People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.'' |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Memento - R |
![]() ''Memory can change the shape of a room; it can change the color of a car. And memories can be distorted. They're just an interpretation, they're not a record, and they're irrelevant if you have the facts.'' A man, suffering from short-term memory loss, uses notes and tattoos to hunt for the man he thinks killed his wife. Guy Pearce: Leonard Memento is deeply psychological, as soon as it starts you can see in between the lines, the stylish layout and the Adult thriller Hitchcock-esque execution, that this is birthed from the mind of Nolan. Carrie-Anne Moss as Natalie, and Joe Pantoliano as Teddy Gammell again show as they did in The Matrix that they have a knack for clamping down and getting roles in deep, challenging, twisty, intellectual pieces. Which also pretty much describes Memento to a small degree. They do a good job in showing no one can be trusted within the film and everyone raises more questions rather than answers. ''I always thought the joy of reading a book is not knowing what happens next.'' Guy Pearce the main focus and Leonard character of Memento, genuinely comes across as being a mysterious faceted three dimensional entity thanks to the mind bending script. Guy's narration really gives the film a gritty Film-Noir detective feel which really lifts Memento to dizzying heights. We see his short term memory effortless put forth to us, we see his tattoos and his troubles state of mind. In this sense Nolan succeeds in using his tool Guy Pierce to as near success as heaven doth allow. ''I have to believe in a world outside my own mind. I have to believe that my actions still have meaning, even if I can't remember them. I have to believe that when my eyes are closed, the world's still there. Do I believe the world's still there? Is it still out there?... Yeah. We all need mirrors to remind ourselves who we are. I'm no different.'' So what is the plot that Memento offers us? As all the pieces start to come together in this jigsaw, at the climax yet in the narrative's ascending beginning, Leonard is denied all the usual action of a hero's benefits and indeed rewards reaped: Increased self-knowledge, knowledge of the world and the plot of occurrences. Is this due to the fact we've given a mass of information by then and think we know him and his situation better? Or is he, as his narrative progresses, getting vaguer, moving towards inertia, the catatonia that finally swamped his altar-ego Sammy Jankis. Our problem is that the film comprises not one plot, but four, all fragmented, full of gaping black holes, all mediated by this character who knows nothing. One is Leonard's narrative as he sees it, as he tries to avenge his wife's murder. The second is told in monochrome flashback (or whatever this is called in a film that runs backward), mostly told in mysterious phone calls, and seem to flesh out the gaps missing in the first plot, but actually creates more. The third is the 'real' plot that may have something to do with cops, snitches, femmes fatales, or may be hallucinated, misremembered by Leonard, or simply planted there as cover for another plot, or may not even exist at all. The fourth is the story of Sammy, who suffered the same 'condition' as Leonard. All four unique strains are obviously connected with each other to create a discordant vision, but each undermines the other. ''My wife deserves revenge, whether I know about it or not.'' |
February 3, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Frost/Nixon - R |
''I'm saying that when the President does it, that means it's not illegal!'' A dramatic retelling of the post-Watergate television interviews between British talk-show host David Frost and former president Richard Nixon. Frank Langella: Richard Nixon Ron Howard and everyone responsible for the creation of Frost/Nixon have selected an historic event, so wonderfully captivating and awe inspiring, that a subtle, restrained documentary styled drama approach works with dazzling results. I haven't seen the original stage play on which the film is centred on, but I can firmly assume that it emphasises alot more focus, on the stage-friendly interviews sequence and less on the depiction of the whirlwind events leading up to the interviews, which occur over extended periods of time and in many locations which the film jumps from very rapidly. In order to bring order to the chaos, screenwriter Peter Morgan, also the playwright of the original stage version, employs a very effective technique of splicing within the film interviews with the characters in the film, taking place some time after the Frost/Nixon interviews but, unlike those ones, are not based on real interviews which occurred in real life but rather are the fruit of Morgan's imaginative world, his mind. It's certainly far more original and interesting a way to portray characters' inner thoughts, to deliver important information quickly and to arrange all the events in the audience members' heads than to use voice-over narration, for example. The film's structure altogether allows for a divulging and highly entertaining drama, the second half focuses on the actual interviews, which are of course naturally dramatic, but the first half depicts the equally interesting behind-the-scenes events, providing us with fantastic character development of both David Frost and Richard Nixon and also with the inherent dramas of Frost's being ridiculed, claims he wouldn't be up to the challenge, his difficulty in securing funds and his descent into an obsession with the interviews while still managing to keep his cool and never lose his focus or stability. Howard and Brian Grazer's production value is through the roof in terms of quality and execution, all the elements in this film come together magnificently, including excellent cinematography from Howard(Similar to the story telling of Cinderella Man) Salvatore Totino and an extremely effective, emotional musical score by Hans Zimmer. But it's undeniable, perhaps because of its roots on the stage, that the centerpiece of the film is the acting. Aided by a stellar supporting cast including familiar faces such as Oliver Platt, Sam Rockwell, Kevin Bacon, Toby Jones and Rebecca Hall, the two pillars of acting, the tent poles of the film, are Michael Sheen and Frank Langella, each of whom delivers an outstanding, truly striking performance, with one ever-so-slightly overshadowing the other. Frank Langella absolutely dominates the role as Richard Nixon. I haven't seen many other films depicting the former president, the most famous of which is probably Oliver Stone's Nixon which features Anthony Hopkins in an interesting, heart-felt and yet slightly off performance, and yet I say with confidence that Langella's performance is the greatest and most convincing cinematic depiction of "Tricky Dick" ever done. Langella nails two very important aspects of depicting a real-life, public individual: the first is perfecting his mannerisms, physical look and voice, which he does outstandingly well. But what differentiates between an imitation and a performance is when you take those mannerisms and that accent and apply them to any dramatic setting. Langella does this so expertly that it's simply a treat just to watch him getting angry and emotional as Nixon. And yet, Langella, Morgan and Howard take special care not to portray Nixon as a total monster; they manage, very carefully, to craft a very full-bodied, rounded character with immense depth and personal drama; the storm brewing behind Langella's eyes, the inner turmoil of Nixon, is utterly spellbinding. Richard Nixon: That's our tragedy, you and I Mr. Frost. No matter how high we get, they still look down at us.David Frost: I really don't know what you're talking about. Richard Nixon: Yes you do. Now come on. No matter how many awards or column inches are written about you, or how high the elected office is, it's still not enough. We still feel like the little man. The loser. They told us we were a hundred times, the smart asses in college, the high ups. The well-born. The people who's respect we really wanted. Really craved. And isn't that why we work so hard now, why we fight for every inch? Scrambling our way up in undignified fashion. If we're honest for a minute, if we reflect privately, just for a moment, if we allow ourselves a glimpse into that shadowy place we call our soul, isn't that why we're here? Now? The two of us. Looking for a way back into the sun. Into the limelight. Back onto the winner's podium. Because we can feel it slipping away. We were headed, both of us, for the dirt. The place the snobs always told us that we'd end up. Face in the dust, humiliated all the more for having tried. So pitifully hard. Well, to *hell with that*! We're not going to let that happen, either of us. We're going to show those bums, we're going to make 'em choke on our continued success. Our continued headlines! Our continued awards! And power! And glory! We are gonna make those mother fuckers choke!''
Frost/Nixon is an excellent, entertaining, engrossing film/story/historical account that works on so many levels and features so many facets that all come together in an excellent example of film-making. Howard, Morgan and crew managed to take a subject that many would consider heavy-handed or irrelevant, and still make it irresistibly entertaining and fascinating to watch. The dramas of the behind-the-scenes antics and character interactions to the interviews is as dramatic and as captivating as the interviews themselves, and Howard manages to avoid his previous pitfall off an overly melodramatic finale by ending the film on a subtler, more realistic but still powerful conclusion. Morgan and actors Langella and Sheen manage to take two very public figures and craft multi-faceted, deep, three-dimensional characters with very well developed personalities and qualities, with Sheen and especially Langella delivering absolutely riveting performances. And throughout it all is director Ron Howard, conducting the orchestra, stepping back and letting every element of the film, the talented technical crew, absorbing story and interesting characters, speak for themselves. This isn't just a film about the interviews, this a telling of a relationship and bond of the two men, hence the title, cleverly a phone call sums up the mindset of Frost and Nixon, it shows that both have redeeming qualities that make them great men. Richard Nixon will always be remembered for his Watergate scandal yet if you look deeper, you find Nixon's humanity, a humanity that is fragile, caring, and like many politicians open to error, yet Nixon has the greatness to admit a mistake, and that took real courage and real honour. ''I let them down. I let down my friends, I let down my country, and worst of all I let down our system of government, and the dreams of all those young people that ought to get into government but now they think; 'Oh it's all too corrupt and the rest'. Yeah... I let the American people down. And I'm gonna have to carry that burden with me for the rest of my life. My political life is over.'' |
February 1, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Underworld: Evolution - R |
''For six centuries I was a loyal soldier to the vampire clan. But I was betrayed. The war was not as it had seemed. In one night, the lies that had united our kind had been exposed.'' The adventure continues, the saga of war between vampires and werewolves. Kate Beckinsale: Selene The original Underworld was not as cool as it clearly thought it resulted as, but it's an entertaining bit of entertainment - and in my view at least, good enough for a sequel. Titled Evolution,, this second installment builds on the original story before it, while still finding the time for enough action to please it's targets criteria. Surprisingly for a boisterous action-horror flick, Len Wiseman's dessert is more restrained than predicted. Although there are plenty of action sequences, the focus is put more firmly on the plot; and this ensures that the film isn't merely a dull collection of stunts. The film begins with a great sequence, which goes back to the beginning of the war between the Lycans and the Vampires. We then follow Selene (Beckinsale) and Michael (Speedman), both now on the run after dispatching vampire elder Viktor (Nighy). We follow the pair as they trace their origins and try to ensure that the first ever vampire, Marcus, isn't able to free his brother William; the first of the werewolves. ''I knew Viktor made a mistake by keeping you as a pet. He should have killed you with the rest of your family.'' One of the major reasons I enjoyed the first film was due to its leather-clad female lead. The sexy Kate Beckinsale reprises her role under the direction of her husband, and is every bit the sassy heroine that a film like this needs. Underworld: Evolution, like the original film, makes best use of this asset! The acting here is more than a little corny overall but on the other hand Beckinsale and the rest of the cast do their jobs well enough to ensure that the film doesn't completely fall down on the acting side. The special effects are good, with the werewolves being particularly of note for being impressive. Werewolves don't often translate to the screen well; but they look just fine in this film! The visuals are dark and Gothic, and look absolutely stunning. As with the first film, the glossy style bodes well with the action scenes and ensures that the film is pleasing to the eye. The best thing about the film for me, however, was the mythology surrounding the war between werewolves and vampires. It's portrayed well, and Wiseman leaves enough gaps to keep the interest, while ensuring that the plot builds to a complete whole by the time the credits role. On the whole, Evolution is a fun sequel which elaborates on untold truths of the first. It builds on the first films helping, and delivers enough new elements to make it interesting to anyone who liked the original. This is the sort of film that wont be remembered long after it's over, for originality, but it makes for a great time viewing, and comes highly recommended to fans. ''There's never been a hybrid before. However ambivalent you might feel about it, the truth is, your powers could be limitless. You depend on blood.'' |
January 28, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Underworld - R |
''I am a Death Dealer, sworn to destroy those known as the Lycans. Our war has waged for centuries, unseen by human eyes. But all that is about to change.'' Selene (Beckinsale), a beautiful vampire warrior, is entrenched in a war between the vampire and werewolf races. Although she is aligned with the vampires, she falls in love with Michael (Speedman), a werewolf who longs for the war to end. Kate Beckinsale: Selene Underworld pits two races from mythology, vampire and lycan, and has them together in an on-going war. While the two are stereotypes of the horror genre, this doesn't play out like a traditional horror story. This action packed story will please horror fans and convert new ones due to the melding of movie types to create a fresh interpretation to a century old genre. A male nurse,(Scott Speedman) unwittingly becomes involved in an on going battle between the two immortal species. When a female vamp Selene(Kate Beckinsale) notices the werewolves following this individual, she becomes suspicious and begins to investigate why he is so important, even if it changes everything she has ever known about her life and vampire history. ''Whether you like it or not, you're in the middle of a war that has been raging for the better part of a thousand years. A blood feud between vampires and lycans. Werewolves.'' Beckinsale's quite fetching in her erotic, PVC, full body costume. Her bondage like outfit's more interesting than her intentionally emotionless performance. One wonders why she didn't keep her British accent as the cast is made up of international actors with a pot-pourri of different brogues? It's good to see her in a lead role, above the title credit, where she holds her own portraying a strong, forceful character. Of late, she's played the glorified girlfriend part (eg. Michael Bay's "Pearl Harbor"). Here, she's independent, without a partner to justify her significance. While this is the kind of role a man would normally play, she's still feminine and sexy without having to show any flesh. The colour film stock has been manipulated intentionally to give a blue hue to it. This reinforces the Gothic style of the flick. Blue isn't just a colour, it's also an emotion, reminiscent of a Mann blue scene. It's constantly raining which adds to the cold feel, the cinematographer and production designer have created. These races are unemotional beings which also strengthens the blue tone. Overall, Underworld is a good action/horror/gangster movie with a strong female lead. This hybrid is filled with polished set pieces and seamless CGI. There's talk that this is the first of a proposed trilogy and I hope the next two will be as strong as this. ''Though I cannot predict the future, the consequences of this night will reverberate through the halls of both great covens for many years to come. Two vampire elders have been slain, one by my own hand. Soon, Marcus will take the throne, and a tide of anger and retribution will spill out into the night. Differences will be set aside. Allegiances will be made. And soon, I will become the hunted.'' |
January 28, 2009 | N/A | |||
| If.... - Unrated | January 27, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| Hot Rod - PG-13 | January 26, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| National Treasure: Book of Secrets - PG | January 26, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| National Treasure - PG | January 26, 2009 | N/A | ||||
| Dancer in the Dark - R |
''I listen to my heart.'' An east European girl goes to America with her young son, expecting it to be like a Hollywood film. Björk: Selma Jezkova I don't even know where to start or where to begin with Dancer in the Dark. If movies, stories or songs are meant to depict the struggle and coldness of life, yet provide a backbone and glimmer of love, hope and sacrifice, then Dancer in the Dark succeeds. This is one of the hardest films to watch and one of the most soul inducingly real experiences, of hopelessness and of pain. Björk as Selma Jezkova, gives the performance of her life, in one of the most heartbreakingly unfair parts of selfless endearment, to ever be committed to celluloid. A mother whom loves her son, to the point she will do anything for him, and won't let anyone come between what little hope she has for them. Her singing segments really show off her vibrancy and energy, and as a counter part to her musical enactments we have her acting, which is unrivaled. Playing a blind mother isn't an easy feat, and no one to my knowledge has succeeded as well as Björk has in this Dancer in the Dark. ''In a musical, nothing dreadful ever happens.'' Musically this film is an artful diversion and combination of real-time and surreal dream sequence singing. The way Dancer in the Dark is filmed is done in a series of gritty, home camera styled shots which convey an awesome sense of realism and cold reality. Overall, Dancer in the Dark is a movie which is about miraculous performances, especially in Björk's case, and I find myself wondering why she didn't garner an Oscar for this powerful display of raw kinetic, selfless power she generates in her magnificence. Not only does she act, she performs, sings and dances, thus giving a performance in body not just in words and emotion. We really believe her unrelenting struggle to save her son, we believe her dramatic,sad situation of her eye sight failing and we believe her selfish way is divine, not just human. In giving her story, a story like this into a film like this, we take the road with her in a sense, we see what others in the film don't see and the wondrous pain she has to face as a consequence of her actions. ''They say it's the last song. They don't know us, you see. It's only the last song if we let it be.'' |
January 24, 2009 | N/A | |||
| Sunshine - R | January 23, 2009 | N/A |