Absolutely magnificent in any way -- and you can't help falling in love with the soundtrack. features some pretty fucked-up, visceral rock n'roll, the way rock n'roll is supposed to be. simply brilliant !!!!!!
P.S. Notes on the Soundtrack: If the "Origin of Love"doesn't make you wanna sing or "the angry inch" probe you to dance and jump till you break your neck... then there must be absolutely someting wrong with you. LoL
Excellent! That's the word, and it's been a great while since it was the first and only word in my review :)
Tonight I feel like writing more, so here it is: if you've heard from people that this film was "slow" or "not funny", they simply don't get it. Don't trust them. See for yourself.
If nothing moves you: the silent choreography of a step by step acquantance, the music, the sparkling nights of Tokyo, then we can tell definitely tell... you're not a romantic.
This film speaks from the heart, and it speaks without being verbose. Release your pent-up inner ear and listen: sometimes silence has too much to say.
i adore david fincher. I think this is a great film, a classic film, a film that makes you gasp no matter how many times you see it. I honestly think it's a masterpiece. even though it may seem too much to say for a young director who mainly did videoclips. I think Fincher is excellent. Morgan Freeman's role is a landmark for his career, and Kevin Spacey portrays one of the villains that will remain characteristic in the movie history. All in all, a great film. 5 out of 5 without any hesitation
one of the most honest films about sex, ever, shortbus dares to reveal sexual and emotional problems, habits and passion, touching the human psyche, where it hurts the most. it's shocking, in a good way, and if you give it your attention for the whole 1 hour and 42 minutes, you'll never regret it. a few films have managed to talk about sexual orientation and sexual phantasy, laying open at the same time, the emotional depth behind them. it's an excellent piece of film-making and I believe John Cameron Mitchell managed to rise above himself after "Hedwig".
Of David Lynch's films, this one is my favorite by far. It made sense to me, even though apparently it didn't make sense to a lot of people... It was an emotional rollercoaster. I won't write much as I don't want to spoil anyone's experience. Anyhoo as in all Lunch's films, you have to look for an inner thread of sentiment rather than plot. It's all like a dream- choose your version of what is real and what is not and just ride along.
Michel (Jean-Paul Belmondo), protagonist and anti-hero, is a young criminal on the run from the police, after stealing a car and killing a cop. He has an affair with a beautiful young American, Patricia (Jean Seberg), an aspiring journalist who sells the New York Herald Tribune in the middle of the Champs Élysées (Eva Green in Bertolucci's "The Dreamers" paid her tribute for this scene). Patricia is also expecting Michel's baby. She helps Michel to dodge the police, while they steal cars together in order to raise money for a trip to Rome.
Breathless is all style. The story line is interesting, but it is just an excuse. It's Godard's aesthetics, production modes, subject matters, and storytelling methods that are key. First of all, the whole movie was shot on a hand-held camera, just like most all New Wave pictures. It was, however, only shot by two people (Godard and his cinematographer, Raoul Coutard) on a budget that did not top $50,000, a mere fraction of what most pictures cost at the time (another facet of the New Wave). It was shot completely on location in Paris, and utilized new film-making techniques that would be used by film-making students for decades to come (such as putting the camera in a mail cart on the Champs Elysees and following Belmondo and Seberg). Note Godard's use of American cinema influence, and how the montage art of the 1950s impacted this aesthetic. [with thanks to a. parondi and izmatt]
I first paid attention to Iain Softley's work when I saw "K-pax". "Hackers" and "wings of the dove"... I thought they were ok. I even liked "the skeleton key" quite a bit.
With "Inkheart" he's probably doing some of his best work.
Great story- a good choice (Brendan Fraser is excellent) and even though it gets too "crowded" around the end, it's touching and thouroughly entertaining.
A very good film and by all means accessible to anyone, which is more than one would expect from Van Sant who's been experimenting in "Elephant" and "Lost days" the last few years. Decent performances, a good script and sound cinematography that has its small, superb surprises- like the "whistle" shot (no more spoilers) :) Watch it anyway and not only for the social albeit very important message of the fight against intolerance and homophobia.
I was waiting for this film to be released (like a proper Neil Jordan fan) and I was really glad I didn't miss it on theaters: an excellent effort to capture the psyche of an avenger. the only problem for the wider audience is the academic approach to it. Jodie Foster is as gripping as ever; yet another above-the-average Neil Jordan film, which I strongly recommend.
I had the luck to watch this on the silver screen, when it was re-released. Painful, personal, life-altering, honest, with all the best qualities of John Cassavetes' work. Simply marvellous, beyond words.
wow.what a tour de force. excellent story, excellent direction by Tony Gilroy, and excellent delivery by Clooney and everyone else, including all the supporting cast, Wilkinson and Swinton.don't miss this.
Atonement is a cinematic triumph. It uses every trick in the book and I think it even invents new ones... So that you actually watch what you'd think it'd be impossible to transfer to the screen. It's a literary movie --I don't think there is actually such a term, but this is just what describes it best. I enjoyed it as much as I would if I was reading a text.
It deserves every bit of the praise for the Oscar nomination it received, concerning the screenplay. I cannot think of a single film that has managed to make it to the screen SO WELL without the use of the voice-over. Brilliant screenwriting, Thumps up for Christopher Hampton..!
"Sideways" is a film about personal accomplishments - and what it means to be able to distinguish the good stuff from the bad stuff. Just like wine. It's also about courage and moving on- and accepting one's failures. In retrospect, it's a brave, honest film that can also entertain you. Quite an accomplishment, if you ask me.
A typically underrated sci-fi flick, that also has something to say. Don't skip it, you'll be rewarded. I left the theater feeling very impressed (and still remember the experience). I think this says enough!
you can't deny Bryan Singer's a mastermind. come on I think he's one of my favs even though I don't credit him othen enough. With this Wolverine... his Xmen films are simply impossible to resist
beautiful. mesmerising, joyful film-making, of the kind that you wish there was more. reality and dream mix - Percy Adlon knows the right doses. a happiness pill for easy riders and cool viewers. in my opinion, excellent. 5/5
a modern classic, and a work of art that remains with you long after you've experienced it. it's worth every second of viewing. Terry Gilliam's pride and joy.
one of the early Bertolucci masterpieces- immaculate cinematography, and a theme that has been theoretically analyzed SO much by academia that is reason enough not to mention more about it here. absolute classic and a must-watch-it for any serious film buff.
Very funny and NEVER boring, this smart piece of film-making plays on both industry standards: high school movies and investigative journalism. and it does so magnificently.
I had the luck to meet one of the writers, Kevin, back in UCD Ireland, and attended the same Film Course with him. His talent was evident even back in the day. One of his projects was choosen for filming - "Clarence" was the short film he did and it was a piece of excellent writing. Kevin's academic background is probably one of the reasons there is a reference to quite a few film classics ("Chinatown"and "Usual Suspects"among them).
I wish Kevin the best of luck, as he seems to be ready to embark on a pretty interesting creative career.
excellent! another Billy Wilder great piece of film-making, makes you go "ah... they don't make films like that anymore". Kirk Douglas is EXCELLENT as the opportunist reporter Chuck Tatum. I prefer him when he's playing the villain, I think his "heroic" persona is less convincing.
Of course this story has to do with media ethics and the exploitation of people as sources of information, that's why I like it so much. It is one of my favorite subjects and also the one I based my thesis on, so I can't be very objective- hahah. Anyway, this morality tale plays the hand to the end- just like the protagonist, with some very interesting results- for the audience.
Don't miss this film- rent it, download it, steal it... do what to have to do to watch :D
If you read Thomas Harris's novel, you'd be surprised how much of what the story is really about managed to make it into the film even though many of the original plot's details were disregarded or altered for the sake of a immediacy. we all know it's an excellent film- it's certainly a Jodie Foster/Anthony Hopkins blast, so why don't people give it more stars, I dunno.
Wow! All you twats out there, Rebecca is in town. Watch out... And learn to pronounce her name: it's Rebecca Neuenswander, and she kicks ass. Literally!
This amateurish film is a perfect dyke vehicle. Forget the Million Dollar Baby. There is no ring here, no gloves, just the street, a couple of hard fists tied up with tape and a lot of blood.
Unfortunately there isn't a director, too. Not of the caliber of Eastwood, of course. Considering that this is Dillon's first film, the outcome is impressive, though. The script itself is not so bad, it's actually quite smart- but the photography is uneven. Good at times, and very bad when you don't expect it to be. Chad Ortis delivers just fine. I wish the ending was different too- and not happy-go-straight, so that I could rate this with a 5.