Claudia's Talk
-
SexiVixxENI recommend you see...
Brothers
by .:SexiVixxENposted 13 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
The Stepfather
by .:SexiVixxENvery predictable... Penn Badgley was verrry nice to look at though =)
posted 13 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should definitely see this!
Scanners
by Mr.Much like Nolan did with Batman, if you put the X-Men in present society it would be this film. Cronenberg - probably the best sci-fi/horror director around, does a brilliant job on the twisty-turning plot, keeps the pacing tight with plenty of action, and chucks in some fantastic scenes of gore - especially the "demonstration" near the beginning. One to watch.
posted 14 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
[Rec]
by LizThis movie is catagorized as horror, but I would call it... a thrilling suspsenceful mystery movie. It's definatly thrilling, it's definatly supspense, and well it is 100% a mystery, and even the end leaves you with a dazed and confused after glow. You know what happened, but.... could it be? You don't have the time to really think it over before you know what a great movie you've just seen.
The actors are all superb and fit their roles down to the last detail. Each character was a realistic recomposition of regular people-- some steriotypes, some not. The over character was a selfish and relentless character striving to survive. But like in life there was one who was trying to save everyone else no matter what the cost.
The horror was great because it showed up, as was gorey, but not to the extent where you have to look away in utter disgust. It was done tastefully for the style of movie. The mosters are scariest because in some sense you can see them really coming to a fruition.
The plot was magnificant! Each scene brought new terrors, new questions, new deaths, and more questions.
The writing, direction and costumes were all done into the style to movie was going for. Each character wore what they would really wear, the directoin was definatly better than Parnormal Activity and Cloverfield yet it had the same affect. The writing was done in a realistic yet chilling way that gave the effect maybe one of them knew what was happening.
I loved this movie. It was great and there will never be a movie that lives up to, although both Quarantine and Paranormal Activity try, they don't live up to a single percentage of this wonderfully profound and inspired horror classic.
DON'T WATCH IT IF YOU AREN'T GOING TO WATCH IT IN SPANISH WITH SUBTITLES. THE SPANISH IS WHAT MAKES IT SO REALISTIC.posted 14 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Overall, (500) Days Of Summer is a romantic-comedy that isn't precisely as awesome as I was expecting but it was still very enjoyable. Marc Webb goes off to a flying start with a great debut! Not one of the best of 2009 but isn't that far off.
Rating: 8/10
(500) Days of Summer
by Sam"People don't realize this, but loneliness is underrated."
Director: Marc Webb
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Zooey Deschanel, Geoffrey Arend, Chloe Moretz
Running time: 95 minutes
Country: USA
I didn't really know what to expect going into this film because it seemed like a very beautiful romantic comedy and I had not seen anything from the director or the actors within the film. It is a very beautiful film to watch because of young people and love itself and how it affects people's lives but at the same time, it does get psychologically tense when regarding the heartbreak that Tom goes through within the film.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt's performance as Tom Hansen was good. What I think was slightly flawed about his performance is he didn't always act like he's absolutely in love with Summer, just acts like a drooling puppy towards her and that did get a bit annoying at times during the film. I don't know whether it is just me but he looks just like the late and great Heath Ledger. Zooey Deschanel's performance as Summer Finn was really brilliant!! Summer is a young woman who works with Tom. She is the assistant of Tom's boss and is Tom's love interest. Tom falls in love with her and starts to have high hopes to begin a relationship with her but things keep changing around between the two and it gradually either gets better or worse. There are a lot of eventful twists and turns in this film which is what I like the most about films in general. I can guarantee her performance is worthy of a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress Musical/Comedy if not a win for her extraordinary and awesome performance!
Overall, (500) Days Of Summer is a romantic-comedy that isn't precisely as awesome as I was expecting but it was still very enjoyable. Marc Webb goes off to a flying start with a great debut! Not one of the best of 2009 but isn't that far off.posted 15 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Diabolique (Les Diaboliques)
by AnneliesThis must be one of the best thrillers I've watched 'cause the storyline is simple and the acting is great, the twist unexpected. It made me sit on the tip of my chair while holding my breath. Very good French oldie. As many other Flixster users write (and I must agree with them) this movie could be a very good competitor to any Hitchcock thriller.
posted 17 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Duplex (Our House)
by AnneliesHey, Danny DeVito still got humour!
I was pleasantly surprised because for once Drew Barrymore doesn't do a romantic comedy, but just a comedy. Of course if you have the famous Ben Stiller on your side you can't go wrong. Eileen Essell is also great.
Sometimes the humour seems a bit exaggerated (like the police mixing up a first aid help situation with a sex assault) but at the end of the movie it will all become clear to you. Nice little twist! I liked that!posted 18 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Cashback
by AnneliesI can't imagine any male NOT liking this movie. I have never seen so much tits & ass in a movie!
Anyway, the story was worth hearing and Emilia Fox has definitely not stolen her last name. Lovely to see Sean Biggerstaff in an other movie than Harry Potter or The Winter Guest. He was perfect in this role. Oscar nomination was maybe a bit exaggerated? Decide for yourself!posted 19 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Encounters at the End of the World
by Mr.I swear Herzog could turn a camera on a brick wall for nine hours and still produce a fascinating documentary. Here he heads to the South Pole and does his usual trick of examining every single thing. He doesn't take the easy, Oscar-baiting route and bleat on about climate-change and penguins - though both do get a mention (the "deranged" penguin bit is really sad), instead he's like a child in constant awe, letting the camera linger, interviewing the people he finds there and watching the bizarre alien-like creatures beneath the ice. It's a brilliant documentary even if you hate ice and the very sight of it makes you sick - such is the greatness of Herzog.
posted 21 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire
by .:SexiVixxEN5 Stars Solid!! This movie is like the little engine that could.I hope this sweeps at Oscar time cause the entire cast is Well deserving.If I had to pick only 3 movies this year to make my UBER top 3 list this would be in there.Emotional ,raw and hard to watch because of the powerful performance by Monique,this is gonna be one of the tops for 2009,Oh and Lenny Kravitz is super hot...still =)
posted 21 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
posted 21 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Lost Highway
by AnneliesI saw this movie in theatre ten years ago. Everyone around me asked the question What the hell was it about? I didn't understand shit! (Myself I was equally confused).
I decided to watch it again today and my concentration was maximum from the very start until the end. I thought I got it about halfway the movie but there must be several ways to interpret this film. To say at least it is a very confusing plot which is also a bit scary. The movie is generally very slow and this time it is not so bad because the brain must follow.
Conclusion: Having watched David Lynch's "Inland Empire" I now have understood that this director is exceptional. He clearly loves porn to start with and this is definitely shown in Lost Highway: it is filled with hot sex scenes. Then you have the great soundtrack of this movie.
He's done a great job here but again it demands concentration. You will either love it or hate it. I loved it!posted 23 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Mifune
by AnneliesSeen this movie tons of times since it has been in my movie collection for several years. Today I watched it for the first time with Danish subtitles, the movie is spoken in the Danish language.
It is the most wonderful love story you can imagine. The performance of Jesper Asholt who played the elder mentally disabled brother Rud is just beyond brilliance. His character is funny, soft, sweet and serious at the same time. He received two awards for this role, totally deserved.
The story itself is a very beautiful one. It never goes down to the Hollywood level of romantic comedies. Why not? Because this is a Danish movie made according to the Dogme certificate, which was signed by a bunch of skilled Danish directors. The director of this masterpiece is Søren Kragh-Jacobsen.
As you can see is the first Dogme movie Festen on number 4 of my all time favourite movies. This one is definitely into the top 10.posted 25 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Overall, 2012 is a very enjoyable action-thriller than nobody should be afraid to see because it is totally filled with science fiction action. 2012 is Roland Emmerich's best film so far and he is starting to get back on track with making entertaining films.
Rating: 8/10
2012
by Sam" Today we are one family."
Director: Roland Emmerich
Starring: John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Thandie Newton
Running time: 158 minutes
Country: USA
I had no interest in seeing this film at all for two reasons: because it was a film about the end of the world in 3 years time and I hate Roland Emmerich for the films he has done in the past. One night very recently, I just decided to watch it because it looked entertaining and I wanted to check out what it would be like if it does end. When I did watch 2012, I was both blown away but also mildly disappointed and sort of relieved as well. The visual effects in the film were absolutely magnificent. The Best Visual Effects category is a tough one this year because there have been a lot of action/science fiction/fantasy films with amazing visual effects and I reckon that 2012 will nominated for it alongside Star Trek and Moon. It will be absolutely amazing on Blu-ray especially with a big screen. Where I was disappointed was that it didn't have enough specific detail regarding the Mayan Calendar or the Mayan's themselves and because of this, the film lacked the believability. It just felt like a random end to the world. At the start of the film it was very realistic regarding what could happen but when the disasters came in, it fell into the science fiction genre and I fell for the enjoyment of the action within it.
I have never been a big fan of John Cusack but his performance in 2012 was absolutely brilliant! I really liked his character. His character is a lot like Ray Ferrier in War Of The Worlds. Only difference was Cusack was great but Cruise was dreadful. Jackson Curtis is a middle aged man who is divorced from his ex-wife and has a son called Noah and a daughter called Lilly. Chiwetel Ejiofor's performance as Adrian Helmsley was good as well. His performance wasn't as good as John Cusack's but wasn't far off. Amanda Peet wasn't good at all as Kate Curtis. She was a good mum but I didn't think her role was as serious or has heroic as Cusack's or Ejiofor's performances were.
After the ultimate disaster that was 10,000B.C., I had absolute pure hate for Roland Emmerich for making such a crap film. After watching 2012, it is definitely Emmerich's most successful film so far but I still don't like him very much. I still can't forgive him for bringing us 10,000B.C.! 2012 is an absolutely typical Roland Emmerich film. He usually does disaster films and I think that this is pretty much the only disaster film that didn't turn out to be a disaster. The action sequences were brilliantly directed but some of the non-action scenes weren't very good. The script was ok at times but it did have its flaws like a lot of films like this have.
Overall, 2012 is a very enjoyable action-thriller than nobody should be afraid to see because it is totally filled with science fiction action. 2012 is Roland Emmerich's best film so far and he is starting to get back on track with making entertaining films.posted 25 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Letyat zhuravli (The Cranes are Flying)
by AnneliesEmotional Russian drama from the early 1960's about a young couple that is separated 'cause Russia enters World War II. I think this movie was very beautifully made and the emotions in the very last scene I think were very sensitive. This is really a must see movie!
posted 26 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Los Cronocrímenes (Timecrimes)
by scottexellent film, a man, enjoying a piecefull day at his countryside home, spots a naked girl in woods behind house, he investigates, and is atacked by a masked man, he runs, and comes across a lab, and generously a lab tec helps him out, and hides him, but what apears to be a time machine, he comes back out, a few hours before. and so begins a great story and plot devices, just like marty in back to the future 2, has to put right, andalso set up events to guide his other self to carry on timeline, and from there a great adventure, great suprises, and not at all complicated, great scenes again seen from other him, filling in all the mysteries, set up before, this grabbed me from beginning to end, with great central performances, the film never gets stupid, or over top, as even though itstime travel, the situations seem real, a superb, film anda exellent suprise
posted 26 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hello folks-this is my first recommendation in months as I have'nt been on site for a very long time and missed all my Flixster friends. Hello to all and it's nice to be back! Catching up on 100's of messages!
Taxi to the Dark Side
by AudreyI've watched this three times now and it has got to be one of the finest docs I've ever seen. A chilling indictment of the Bush administration's war on terror and use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" (gag) on enemy captives. Not an easy watch but a must watch-a socially significant and horrifying glimpse into the policies/procedures of those 3 war criminals-Bush,Cheney and Rumsfeld...
posted 26 days ago -
AgentLexi2132 (Moderator)I recommend you see...
Metropolis
by Alexander''There can be no understanding between the hand and the brain unless the heart acts as mediator.''
In a futuristic city sharply divided between the working class and the city planners, the son of the city's mastermind falls in love with a working class prophet who predicts the coming of a savior to mediate their differences.
Gustav Fröhlich: Freder
Brigitte Helm: Maria / The Robot
A handful of stories and films will always be known for proving themselves against the proverbial test of time; making their mark in the pantheon of the most influential, memorable and near flawless crafted films in existence. Upon viewing in a contemporary context; even over 80 years after its initial release in 1927, the recognition of Metropolis; director Fritz Lang's masterpiece; among such timeless examples Metropolis is without a doubt included. The catalyst for all ensuing science fiction films and tremendously influential; even outside of the genre it essentially pioneered, the sheer imagination and vision behind Metropolis prove its indisputable quality decades after its time.
A tremendously ambitious and controversial feat when first released, the political and thematic content riddling the film's impressively complex storyline are astounding; proving an early testament for the potential of big budget projects to resonate with strong thematic content as opposed to being simply entertaining. Taking notes and inspirations from Karl Marx (creator of Communist ideology; for those whom don't know), among other prominent schools of thought, politics, ideologies and philosophies. The revolutionary dystopian vision of a colony of workers rebelling against the alienated upper classes proves a daring and fiercely compelling vision relevant even to this day, without even pausing to realize this is a film made in Germany in the 1920s. Similarly, the film makes a particularly effective, futuristic science-fiction piece by proving frighteningly prophetic from grander themes of commodity culture to smaller touches; with ideas which would have seemed outlandish at the time such as video phones and machine men starting to become disconcerting realities. While parts of the original film are sadly lost or missing, as they are summed up by title cards in the same way dialogue was conveyed, the occasional lapse in pacing hardly distracts from the gripping and astonishingly powerful narrative.
Similarly, the film's dynamic visual style is equally comendable, and the entire film captivates with a hypnotic, entrancing beauty. The expressionist art influenced futuristic sets and buildings and surprisingly advanced visual effects never fail to captivate, and the frequent moody lighting is an aesthetic delight. Sequences such as the opening scene of columns of repressed workers trudging desolately to work to Freder's cinematically innovative hallucination of death striking the city, the mad inventor Rotwang's construction of the iconic Machine Man to the allegorical tale of the tower of Babel prove utterly unforgettable, with Lang conjuring up a dramatic intensity essentially unparalleled in its time. Such seamless quality both technically and thematically has scarcely been glimpsed to such a degree since, and the film's incredible influence becomes increasingly clear in other works after viewing it.
While the film is seldom praised for its acting, considering the expressionist conventions of over-exaggerated facial expressions and movement to express inner sentiments, the film comes as across as far less melodramatic than one might expect, though the distinctly different performance styles may prove unsettling or unintentionally comical to a contemporary audience. Gustav Fröhlich is a suitably engaging and charismatic lead as the young son of the city's founder who becomes increasingly disgusted with the harsh mistreatment of the working class denizens. As his distant father, Alfred Abel turns in a poignant performance as Frederson, founder of Metropolis, consumed by his own ambition to the point of losing touch with the world around him. Rudolf Klein-Rogge is unforgettable and enormously entertaining as twisted inventor Rotwang, setting the standard for countless mad scientist icons to follow. Similarly, Brigitte Helm is both luminous and horrifying in turn; portraying both the earnest figurehead for a working class resistance movement who attracts the attention of the impressionable Freder, and a demonic incarnation of herself portrayed by Rotwang's devious Machine Man.
Visionary, innovative and desperately socially relevant, Lang's disturbing and captivating labour of love holds its own against the ages, proving nearly as staggeringly impressive an achievement in a current day context as its initial release over 80 years ago. Lavish and blindingly spectacular, dazzling set pieces and high production values, Metropolis rises above and stands testament to Fritz Lang's ambitious artistic visionary perceptions of how cinema could be used. Among classics such as 2001: A Space Oddysey, Blade Runner which came many years later; Fritz Lang's Metropolis is the true science fiction classic original. It also is another great insight into workings of our systems, society and why some work and some do not; in a classing system of extreme rich and poor. Fritz Lang's M; which followed in 1932, also dealt with some of the same issues concerning Metropolis. Stabs at the structure of society and the evils of the mob prove Unity is always above chaotic Hysteria.posted 27 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Gossip
by AnneliesGreat thriller. Also I was misleaded by the strange end of this film.
I felt a lot of emotions when watching this. But one thing needs an explanation: three students sharing such a huge student flat is extremely unusual, definitely when they are the so called poorer students.posted 27 days ago -
I recommend you see...Hey, you should really see this!
Oliver Twist
by AnneliesOriginal Review
This movie is just ok... but it's quite different from the book... It's a bit confusing at the end, this movie.
EDIT
I think the book I read first was a very shortened Dutch translation of the original novel. That is why I thought it was different from the book. I now have to change opinion. I just finished the 1837 English original novel and watched David Lean's version once again. It's more than ok! It's a great masterpiece and closer to the novel than Polanski's 2005 version.
Almost a must see!posted 28 days ago

