Collide

audience Reviews

, 29% Audience Score
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    quien tubo la genial idea de creas 4 historias diferentes que que ocurren al mismo tiempo y ninguna termina?
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    Amazing movie and great acting!!!
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    Gripping thriller? Nope. Nauseating camera work? Yep. Not worth your time.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Well. Like many others, the trailer pulled me in. It immediately became a train wreck after the introduction of circumstances: what could be an interesting tale of outcomes surrounding three bizarre circumstances inevitably devolves into a merciless slog coupled with a tirelessly jittery screen that makes the Hardcore Harry pov film look like child's play. Seriously…handheld shaky cam for a full 90 minutes should be illegal. Also, I have to say the soundtrack does the heavy lifting with its frequent "braaams" and attempts to keep things spicy sonically. 30 minutes into the film you realize it's part of their gimmick and the slog deepens. All in all, watch the trailer and stop there.
  • Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
    I really expected this to be unwatchable. maybe draggy and boring. But it's not. It's a roller coaster following three couples over one critical night. It is violent, drug-filled and sexy. It's definitely not boring. No matter how happy the people seem at the beginning, each one faces major problems during the next ninety minutes. The only player I knew beforehand was Jim Gaffigan who was excellent in a sad and dark role. I would say his is the darkest character, but that would prove I hadn't watched the picture. Every character is making life-altering decisions on this night. This movie is worth watching. You definitely won't be bored.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    I'm sick from the camera moving...shitty over-acting
  • Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
    Collide is a lot like a knock-off "Crash" and not nearly as well written. All the stories are connected except Phillippe and his date...and the treatment of everyone else's back story is a little trite.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    I couldn't even sit through 10 minutes of it. I would've watched it if the freakin camera just sat STILL. Cinematography just needs to be a lot better. I feel like it was a beginner student film. Camera was moving so much I got nauseous. The trailer made the script and story sound interesting, but right off the bat it starts off confusing. But ig if you're into that. CGI is also recognizable. I love Kat as an actress, artist, etc and support her no matter what project she does, but I felt like she was just doing charity work at this point. How did this movie even make it to HULU?
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    I get what they were trying to do but the only real draw here is some of the casting. The camerawork/cinematography choice here is baffling. The zooming in and out and shaky camera style takes what should be tense moments and make them feel like parody or an episode of The Office. It's hard to root for any of the characters here because the little time we get to spend with each pair is filled with pretty standard dialogue and somewhat hard to believe motivations. Also how does an average woman/person sneak a bomb into a restaurant and strap it to a chair with no one noticing? Feels like more backstory was needed to care about any of these characters. Not a total waste of time but I wouldn't make it a priority to see this one.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    The movie is so bad. Kat's acting makes it even worse. So bad