Glass

This may not be M. Night Shyamalan's worst movie, though it's surely his most disappointing.

You have to admire the nerve of Shyamalan for attempting something like this-and indeed, for choosing Glass as the title for a film so unashamedly non-transparent.

It's good to have him back. It's a great looking film, it's great storytelling, and again he really takes his time.

With a movie jumping from character to character so often, it just didn't have flow or pacing or tone.

What's disappointing isn't that Shyamalan chose not to make Unbreakable 2; it's that what began so successfully with Unbreakable has devolved into such thoroughly unsatisfying pulp, void of any real humanity.

I went with it... I thought this was Shyamalan's best film since Signs.

All three films have elements of the science fiction, but while Unbreakable and Glass are closer to mystery, Fragmented has greater thriller components. Finally, unlike the traditional superhero genre, we do not know the origins of these powers...

James McAvoy offers you a performance worthy of any price of admission (...) How can a movie be so fascinating and frustrating at the same time? Shyamalan, ladies and gentlemen.

Overall, it’s one of the strangest, most daring superhero movies out there. Where DC trades in grim realism and Marvel does the whole snarky, joke-a-minute thing, the Shyamalanverse (I guess that a thing now) is a flavor all its own...

Shyamalan’s polished compositions...the use of bold, comic book-influenced coloring, and his ability to draw strong performances out of actors as disparate in style as Willis...and McAvoy—all give Glass a real sense of grounded humanism.