Here After

audience Reviews

, 29% Audience Score
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    interesting on age old subject=the value of true love and it's effect on the afterlife
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    This was just bad. Contrived, wooden and forced.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    You know how some movies are so bad they're good.. Well this one isn't one of them.. The best thing about this movie is you can watch it in under 30 minutes.. Just watch the first 12 minutes, fast forward 15, rinse and repeat.. You won't miss anything of value..
  • Rating: 0.5 out of 5 stars
    The acting reminds me of an old live action video game. Despite him being invisible to the living they still look at him when he speaks. Nothing good can be said about this
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    Both Ricci and Armezeder shine here. This is like a poor man's Defending Your Life. I came to leave a review because despite the film's flaws, it earns its ending.
  • Rating: 1.5 out of 5 stars
    Poorly written and directed . Long drawn out story line of finding your true love all for him to fall for someone who is alive. He then has the chance to save her life and goes all around the block and she still dies. So stupid
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Why did that have to happen?
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    Updated version of ghost. Just without Patrick Swayze and Demi Moore.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    Really terrible movie. Unlikes lead playing an unlikeable character. Dialogue is sometimes wooden, sometimes crass. Director doesn't get decent dialogue out of anyone and it's slow and dull as … death. Don't waste your life on this.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    I wanted so badly to like this movie, and I gave it every chance, watching all the way to the end, but the frustrations were just endless. Andy Carl may be a prince of Broadway but he is at the moment in capable of carrying a film or even a scene or two. I think the overacting, grand gestures etc. of the theater don't translate at all to film, or subtlety in the minutest neurons are called for. Christina Ricci was oddly just completely bland. Biggest problem though was the script, which to be blunt was just complete horseshit . Most of the dialogue was so simplistic and superficial, and there were endless scenes that in no way propelled a story forward, which is a complete requisite for any scene. I can barely recall now, five minutes after the movie ended, any real conversations or intimacy or revelations from any of the characters. The main character going the entire movie being frustrated and "not understanding" makes almost no sense, there doesn't seem to be any growth in the character from his early death to the end even though the plot says he has grown and fallen for this woman and wants to save her to his own detriment , that was actually nowhere supported in the film except possibly in the fire escape scene where we don't hear their entire conversations but project that they are opening up and that intimacy is happening. The idea that he would be in the apartment screaming and telling her to leave but not saying that he just seen Patrick shoot someone, not share any details is both preposterous and goes against any sense that they had built a relationship of openness or depth. The very premise that you can't move on without finding a soulmate is also both ridiculous and depressing since probably 95 or 98% of humans during their lives do not find such a connection, plus if there is any greater power they certainly would not require that for one to move on when there are so many other more important and great qualities and traits that a human being can possess, than simply having been lucky enough to find a "soulmate." Clearly low budget, but still a bit baffling how or why this got funded. I could probably write another 10,000 words on the problems with cinematography, pacing and casting.