Zeroville

One word SUCKS… So there making me write more bs about this movie, but really you don't need it.

Movie is aggressive with its agenda. Some of the aggressiveness paid off while most of it sadly didn't. The cast was great and were believable playing parts they would not normally play.

James Franco evolves his career as frequent director on screening his visualizations inspired by his unique reading list stemmed from his rejuvenated education pursuit, despite better as reading material than a matching adapted film set with "The Disaster Artist" actually being his best work. His latest in "Zeroville" had potential further intrigued by gathering his buddies to take the appreciative conversations towards the cinema in the influentially discussed 60s seriously, which their genuine efforts by a switch been felt with occasional humorous chuckle signifying their irresistible comic, alongside showcasing meaningfulness towards the industrial art. It provides signs of another cult classic to a provoked thought, but what truly faltered the film in decline is the contrived chemistry in additional adjacence to mechanically repetitive line delivery that lost convincing connection amidst ill-conceived, nonsensically lowbrow interferences that seems to reflect a certain belief taught and carried through the film. You can value its appreciative gesture towards Hollywood with playful figures, but the picture gets progressively hazy after the ill-mattered first impression in the beginning. (C+)

It's Sufficiently Bizarre To Be Mildly Thought Provoking..At Least On An MTV Post-Pop-Punk Level. Otherwise, There Is Just A Bunch Of Cobbled Together Scenes That Develop Into Some Sort Of Story With No Continuity, Which I Gather Is A Nod To The Early Scene & Original Pretense On Continuity Being irrelevant In Many Films..Never Affecting The Overall Outcome. Or In This Case, I Beg To Differ, As It Was All Too Confusing & Bizarre. Required More But Gave Less.

Odd little movie that just seemed to miss the mark for the most part 2.4

I kind of expected this to be half decent given how well Franco did 'The Disaster Artist', and visually it is interesting, but the end result to me is basically like Franco got really high and tried to imitate Astron 6's 'The Editor' (which is a lot better by the way)... and Megan Fox? Really??

If I gave you a couple great actors a couple great comedians and some really hot women... How could you not make a great film or at least one worth watching ? I would say ask Director of Zeroville by James Franco he manage to make and awful film with a great cast. I mean come on you got Megan Fox hot and she goes topless. You have Will Ferrell, Craig Robinson, Danny McBride, Seth Rogen, Horatio Sanz and there is no scene that will ake you laugh or even smile. This was not a comedy , thriller, drama etc.. this was i guess and attempt at what hollywood would call a "artsy" film. As someone who loves movies this was garbage with Franco's ego spending over and hour to get to a scene with his brother of course. This scene was suppose to make the movie and have you have i got it moment instead it was dumb and boring. I want it clear I love all the actors in this movie and James Franco as not just as and actor but a director to. He just stunk up the place with this one i think a high school kid could have made a better film with this cast and probably for a lot less money.

I think it was terrible, the blow to the Duke was the worst part. One and only James Franco movie I hated.

Zeroville is a weird watch, with a script that fails to capitalise on it's A-list comedic cast. Quirky in parts, but none of the characters are easy to get behind. We've seen worse though, it's slightly better than zero.

We come full circle as Franco becomes Wiseau.